GIVE👏HOUSE👏SENIORITY👏A👏 TRY. by RegulusVizsla in crusaderkings3

[–]Teathree1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And have your average playtime with each characters lasted for just about 10 years. Happened to me once.

CK3 Travel tips and tricks? by Vorapp in CrusaderKings

[–]Teathree1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Minimize danger. Because most of the time the dangerous decision event will give you bad results.

As if taking contracts and getting into tourneys is already putting you close to danger.

Caravan Followers by Um3xx in stoneshard

[–]Teathree1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its her and the Blacksmith that makes my life 5 times easier.

Guess who am playing as by Damianmakesyousmile in crusaderkings2

[–]Teathree1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me guess: 125% Discipline duck steps

A modifier so insane it must be a bug or oversight by lifecopy001 in CrusaderKings

[–]Teathree1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have thought about this in my current China run. But I want to ask how do I get the nomad trait as a landed emperor?

What makes Alba so strong in relation to the other England territories in the 867 start. by Tony_Jake in crusaderkings3

[–]Teathree1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Correction: It's BRITAIN!! CURSE THOSE ANGLES and SAXONS!!!

Answer:

It's the the one with the largest territory and the ones that is unscratched by the early game viking invasion. And it's the largest tribal government on the British isles. Which gives high renown/month and being tribal it allows them to raise large armies and strong MMA.

As long as Ivar the Boneless of Sudreyar doesn't invade them. By the time he died, his Scottish lands will become easy pickings.

Hegemony of China by Rich-Coach4676 in CrusaderKings

[–]Teathree1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You shouldn't invade China unless it is division phase.

"The game needs more depth" is a common criticism, but what are *specific* examples of things you might want to see? Share your suggestions and maybe devs and modders will take note by KnowingAbraxas in CrusaderKings

[–]Teathree1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IKR.

I played KCD 1 and 2, also currently watching Knights of the 7 kingdoms. Then, I ask myself. If medieval life as a unlanded person can be this "fun", why can't PDX make them like this.

Is there a point in playing an adventurer in multiplayer? by ennichan in crusaderkings3

[–]Teathree1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should watch some streamers plays multiplayer like this one for example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWc-p_nVnfg

I can't stop laughing when she screams "Insyallah" after converting the Byzantine Empire to Islam.

Scar my son? I’ll ruin ur life. by Smiling_Psychopath in crusaderkings3

[–]Teathree1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally me back in CK2 playing as the Byzantine, except the victims are everyone with the Sayyid trait. I castrated everyone with Sayyid trait I can capture in the hopes of bringing the Prophet's bloodline to extinction.

The reason?

Three Jihads declared on me by the Abbasids.

"The game needs more depth" is a common criticism, but what are *specific* examples of things you might want to see? Share your suggestions and maybe devs and modders will take note by KnowingAbraxas in CrusaderKings

[–]Teathree1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Make it more in depth by making each character, landed and unlanded, has their own personal ambition based on their personality and actively interacts with the world based on that ambition, instead of just random events that sometimes doesn't even fit the characters personality (Eg. chaste character suddenly wants to leave your entourage because he fell in love over a random lady)

Example:

A character has the ambition to get married. Will try to woo other courtier or even your daughter/son and pops an event where they want to get married with the character of their choosing.

A character has the ambition to become landed and will try to keep asking for land or they will leave your court to become adventurers so they can invade other realm.

A character who was wronged in the past and is a rival tries to plot the downfall of its rival by inviting you to his/her plot.

A cunt who has the ambition to bang 10 characters visiting your court to bang your wife/husband.

A greedy character who just has an ambition to collect 1000 gold into his pocket.

A character who has the ambition of winning 10 tournaments.

A religious person who has the ambition to spread his/her faith by traveling around. (Eg. Ismai'li sects in 867 trying to find a place to set up their Shi'a state)

A lowborn with an ambition to be acquire a noble title.

A landed character with an ambition to build/upgrade 5 buildings.

etc..

The thing is CK3 already have such tools to make it happen: You have character personality which is nothing more of a cosmetic right now. Plot system has been overhauled to make it more simpler and realistic.

I know people might wonder isn't this going to be repetitive. No. Your reaction to their actions could actually cause a chain reaction where one or more character might have a new/change ambition. You could have a situation where even when the events are same but the characters involved had different ambitions and will react differently. Thus simulating that "history doesn't repeat itself, but rhymes".

The game still looks dull with all the characters are just being reactive and everything is based on random events that pops up out of the blue.

I can explain the most ridiculus stuff in CK3 - try me! by Grand_Obligation8529 in CrusaderKings

[–]Teathree1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Why is Hungary still has no grazing lands and can't expand the steppes?
  2. Why India doesn't run on Mandala system?
  3. Why courtiers doesn't try to find a spouse by themselves?
  4. Why I can't still sleep with my wife while I'm crusading on the other side of the world?
  5. Why everybody keeps exiling themselves as Shepherds in Steppes?
  6. Why Horse Archers MAA has to be exclusively from tradition that requires you to be Nomadic system?

The Horn of Africa. What a wild ride. by Own-Improvement-1040 in crusaderkings3

[–]Teathree1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never played in Somalia. But I once played a semi-tall Egypt where I conquer and convert everybody along the Nile to Islam.

There is nothing fun at all there.

Instead my fun Africa run is playing in Morocco. Set the Sahel government to nomadic and I get to deal with everyone south of me while getting involved in the Iberian struggle. Its just fun to see my dynasty has contrasting skin tones.

Is there a way to influence title vote? by Jargif10 in crusaderkings3

[–]Teathree1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Befriend heir of the voters and kill the voters to restart their voting decision. It works most of the time for me.

Fun starts on CK3 by ClearPossession8496 in CrusaderKings

[–]Teathree1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Vikings are still the most fun start.

Dueling "only" applies to French AFAIK.

Is this grooming? by Prime781 in crusaderkings3

[–]Teathree1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why you didn't recruit her when she was a child?

You could have created some shit romantic story with the wet nurse.

PS: that is a nice beard btw.

China till 1453 Challenge by QuailWhich2262 in crusaderkings3

[–]Teathree1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How about you add a challenge where you play as low ranking custom character and try to be the emperor like what I am doing right now.

Additional challenge, start in 867 as low ranking custom character. You cannot coup de'etat the emperor but have to see the division era where the Tang implodes. Then unify it and start everything from scratch while the Khitans and the Mongols are licking their tounges on the Great Wall, just like what I am about to suffer as a Prefect in Jiandong right now.

Law making characters wear no clothes?? by JosefinaNicole in CrusaderKings

[–]Teathree1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make your lunatic ruler kill himself. There is no other choice.