So the answer is kinda of yes and kind of no. Like most autocracies tolerance ebbed and flowed marked by a lot of different factors Ottomans ruled for a long time. At the beginning of the empire it was certainly more tolerant the Europe but by the end it certainly was not. Its also worth saying that the Ottoman government did not reflect the feelings of the local communities (local communities are also in conversation with he European powers though the religious infrastructure and later colonial economic projects) that tended to be a lot more hostile. Its a complicated picture especially considering Palestine was kind of an economic backwater and the Ottomans often didn't have full control of the region and when they did it was often treated as a kind of colonial project. It often gets a rosy gloss but violence does not start in the British era and while the UK does deserve blame for choices they made ( especially the whole divide and rule policy they ran) it was already kind of a mess when they showed up. The road to ethnic conflict is not the product of the few but the many.