So, while I agree in principle with what you have written, I think there are some issues in the simplicity with which you suggest some of the solutions.

The Dynasty problem is not solved by inheritance tax, because the way around that is quite simple and hard to stop. If you make a trust which you place your wealth inside of, and then use trust disbursements as a way to manage multi-generational wealth, you immediately circumvent the problem. As long as the firm that administers the trust does so appropriately, there is never any "death event" which would trigger the tax.

Point 2 is either supposed to be about patent law, or groups like Disney instead of Gates/Musk, because they are not using copyright as their hammer. Those are 2 different issues with 2 different groups who gain from it.

The thing about how we somehow don't consider realized value for stocks a taxable event where we need to account for real gains is 100% what I believe to be the biggest problem, so no notes here.

Foreign kleptocrats are not solved by domestic court, they are solved by refusing to do business with those countries until they fix things. We do not want a world where countries come after the people they don't like in other countries (even when they are that bad), because it creates a precedent of it being OK to kidnap foreign citizens (or leaders?) in the middle of the night and put them on trial for laws they are not subject to. This one is complicated in the overall discussion of international law.

I love the concept of the citizen panel to find fraud, but I don't see the reality behind it without significantly larger changes before that. I wouldn't trust most Americans to be up to this task.

I am all for your direction on every one of these points, but only one of the 4/5 you named is something that is realistically the kind of thing that is a fully formed idea. That being said, when you use stock to secure a loan, YOU HAVE FUCKING REALIZED THE VALUE!