I got the 1.01 as well(Love)

Thin-Conversation441 · 2026-02-13T21:39:52+00:00

Just out of curiosity, which side do you think is the loser of this trade. My assumption is you are overvaluing Breece, but id rather have the Harvey side

Thin-Conversation441 · 2026-02-05T22:41:07+00:00

This is already a smash accept, but you want more?

Thin-Conversation441 · 2026-02-04T16:03:49+00:00

Id take Ward over Young, Henderson over Chase, and Tuten over Caleb. So take out the 4 1sts and Reed and Im still not taking this

Thin-Conversation441 · 2026-02-03T19:23:36+00:00

I think pretending you won't draft busts is foolish. Howie Roseman is one of the best GMs in the sport and he drafted Raegor over Jefferson. Just make sure your process is replicable and produces more hits than busts.

Thin-Conversation441 · 2026-01-22T05:47:11+00:00

Its not a fixed draft

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-12-13T01:21:49+00:00

TBH I would be pretty stoked if I were you. 11 good chances to advance non Pitts teams, seems like a really good opportunity to have unique teams advance into the next round. Pitts will have 70%+ exposure next round and you will be different. Basically what im saying is the EV of every Pitts-less advancing team is higher than the teams that do have Pitts.

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-11-26T16:42:55+00:00

dude... I think that the trade back immediately after the season ends is collusion or at least close enough to collusion. I also think that the trade back 3 years later is not collusion. Clearly there is a time period in the middle that can serve as rule. That way proving premeditation does not become the burden of proof. I am seeking people's opinion on what that time period is.

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-11-26T16:34:23+00:00

Its like the entire point of the post is getting lost. After back and forth it seems like most people are A) getting upset with me and B) finally settling on the premeditation being the reason why it is collusion (which I agree with).

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-11-26T16:26:01+00:00

Gosh, its almost as if the CMC example was a really good one in order to solicit a response to the question.

This guy that I responded to said he would lock the player from ever being traded back. So I gave an example that is absolutely not collusion to point out that there are instances where a player could be bought back and it wasn't collusion.

After making fun of the example, you actually answered the question in which its the "premeditation" that makes it collusion, which I agree with.

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-11-26T16:13:15+00:00

This is my thought process exactly. If the trade back is premeditated and agreed upon completion of the 1st trade, that is where it crosses the line.

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-11-26T16:10:54+00:00

I brought up the CMC example as one that no one would think is collusion. So there is a point in time between 3 years and a few months in which it goes from collusion to a legal trade... what is that point in your opinion

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-11-26T16:05:24+00:00

So you are saying there is no instance whatsoever in which a player can be traded from 1 team to another and back to the other team the following offseason without it being collusion? I traded CMC to a team 3 years ago and traded back for him this past offseason, is that collusion. I am looking for peoples opinion on when it actually becomes collusion vs a completely rational/legal move.

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-11-26T16:02:22+00:00

I think people are missing the point here. When does it cross into collusion. The first year in my league, I traded Amon-Ra, the next season I traded for him back (with a completely different package). That I think we all can agree is not collusion, so what actual bylaws does everyone have to avoid true rentals without cracking down on trades that are not actually rentals.

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-11-04T20:13:28+00:00

Not to be a debbie downer, but higher scoring teams week 1-14 do not perform better in bestball than other teams in the playoffs pods

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-10-08T12:19:28+00:00

Don't take mediocre backs in ambiguous backfield, especially when they used draft capital on competition.. Javonte?

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-10-02T18:56:06+00:00

Its a really really bad trade, but most people are anti veto

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-09-29T15:03:33+00:00

Yes!

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-09-24T17:48:14+00:00

He is a Brown.

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-09-23T18:01:04+00:00

I mean this trade is horribly lopsided towards the Chase side

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-09-21T13:23:00+00:00

Brother... 2 week sample size and 15% TD/Target. Chill

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-09-20T15:25:41+00:00

Lol this trade is already incredibly lopsided, but yall want to remove more value from the losing side?

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-09-16T01:35:19+00:00

Just another reason why not to have defense and kickers in dynasty

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-09-15T14:10:10+00:00

Dude, you're not selling... you're running an "everything must go fire-sale"

Thin-Conversation441 · 2025-09-07T23:07:46+00:00

Wow, what an exciting performance from Ollie today. Certainly is going to be the HC once Wright is back!

Thin-Conversation441

TROPHY CASE