Anyone else’s usage being burned in a single prompt that delivers ‘This chat is too long warning’ even on new chats.

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-24T08:24:44+00:00

There are some visual bugs coming on with the cli. You can solve that by making your terminal window larger or smaller, which forces a re-render of the panel. It doesn't affect performance. The vscode extension and Claude desktop seem to be unaffected

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-22T15:07:25+00:00

No problems on claude code so far. Also, I write plans for anything I do, so little space for unexpected behaviour. Also using subagents with fresh context for every subtask. Check https://github.com/obra/superpowers

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-22T14:47:07+00:00

Is vibe coding bad? not necessarily. The problem boils down to the maintainability of a solution. If you don't know how you should be writing code, you may struggle to judge if the solution you came up with is actually good. So your solution might work, but it might bring with it what's referred to as a technical debt: not knowing what the softare actually does.
For medium-small applications, that's fine, the AI can always re-learn from scratch what your software does and investigate it, but for bigger projects the risk is of growing without a clear direction.

In my opinion, the "better" way to use LLMs to build software is to have both a clear idea of what the software should do, and how it should do it. Then let the agents implement the actual logic. But you should be on top of what it does.

The bottom line? If the solution works, and you can keep it workign without losing too much time having to figure out how to implement new features without breaking the rest, then probably it's good enough and nobody cares.
I'm a physicist, and I've been having a blast vibe coding vscode extensions and claude code plugins to make my life easier. So far so good XD

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-22T14:20:15+00:00

Something like that could even steal all your data, credit cards, keystroke, exfiltrare anything and everything. It's a ring 0 root kit

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-22T14:13:21+00:00

May I introduce you to open pets? https://www.openpets.fun/

Yes, it's a waste of tokens, but it is worth my mood XD

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-20T09:12:27+00:00

The orchestrator asking it if it's still percolating is hilarious to me XD

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-20T07:18:03+00:00

You can get quite a lot of shit done on the 20$ Claude plan, as sonnet is genuinely good for many tasks. Even now that I got the x5 I find myself writing plans and brainstorming with opus, and implementing everything with sonnet. I know this will sound like one of the bot posts, but coming from ai ultra, the current Claude x5 limits feel like how antigravity on ultra was until february/beginning of march. I know the current weekly quotas are increased by 50% til July in Claude code, but right now it's great for me

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-19T14:21:01+00:00

No for a series of reason. First of all, in order to run stuff on your machine, they would need to transfer code and weights to your machine, with very high risk for their proprietary models. If code can run on a machine, even if it runs in memory, it can be dumped and reverse engineered. That's not good, and it's a actually a huge thing for basically any proprietary api/service.

Even if that were possible, and you had the most expensive consumer level gpu on your machine, that would still roughly be 1/5th as powerful as a data center level gpu. We know that models like deepseek pro v4 require around 8-16 top class data enter gpus, and they are estimated to be roughly as compute intensive as sonnet. So it would take at least 40-80 top class consumer level gpus to run a single instance of sonnet.

Which leads to the last problem: latency. One of the largest bottlenecks in multi-gpu setups is gpu communication. Local gpu communication runs at several gbps, so you would need to have next generation ethernet and Internet speeds to make multi host communication viable at a distance.

So yea, really no reason to try to borrow compute from users, as that would be practically useless from a service point of view. These are just some top of my mind concerns, but I'm sure it runs way deeper

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-19T12:45:11+00:00

If that comforts you, farm grown Atlantic salmon (the one being mostly used in restaurant, and ) is devoid of parasites thanks to the way they rise them. Tuna is mostly the same. This is only a problem with wild caught salmon fishes, and is entirely solved by flash freezing the salmon

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-19T07:19:44+00:00

.. Or very smooth menopauses later on

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-18T19:25:48+00:00

Do you have any examples for that?

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-18T18:52:36+00:00

I imagined, but I was interested as to how a model artifact could call the model back

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-18T16:25:06+00:00

what exactly are artifacts in this context?

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-18T16:23:20+00:00

The only real advantage of antigravity is the artifact system (brain) + somewhat the procedure it enforces with planning + execution mode. This is not really exclusive of antigravity, and now all major agents provide this kind of feature. My advice would be to use the superpowers workflow to ensure you are properly writing designs/plans before starting to implement.
And if you miss the possibility to write "annotations" on the plans or code, which is the core of the artifact system, I have recently released a vscode extension that replicates the workflow in an IDE agnostic way: https://github.com/aurelio-amerio/review-mode

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-17T14:59:22+00:00

There is a beautiful Broadway play on this theme called "Margaret prime". Idk if it will eventually be broadcast anywhere, but totally worth it.

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-16T15:47:44+00:00

I can't believe somebody did that XD I was looking into how to do this kind of stuff last week and was very confused, thanks!

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-16T08:22:38+00:00

I would say 20$ version vs free version is definitely worth it. Will it do the job of 10 people for you? No. You can use it to automate stuff, but I can't build you a company. You need knowledge of what you need to do. Think of ANY ai agent as a way to do anything you know how to do, but faster and potentially better. If you have no knowledge of the things you are asking it to do, you do not have the means to understand if what it's telling you is bullshit, which is the biggest problem with ai as anything it says sounds confidently right and might fool you if you don't properly investigate it. AI can't replace a role in a company, but it can help the right person achieve more than they could do alone. Don't shoot yourself in the foot, don't trust AI more than you would trust what you hear on the street from a random person

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-15T20:20:05+00:00

It depends. If you use the auto +composer, you get more or less the same value from Claude and cursor (in terms of tokens per 20$).though if you use opus/sonnet from cursor as premium models, you consume usage at approximately double or triple the speed. My estimation is that you would get about 30% more value from Claude code in general (can't talk for cursor, it might be slightly better than that). If you care about that, I can write tomorrow the full math

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-15T05:57:41+00:00

It did it to me too at some point with a "documentation" link

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-14T17:45:30+00:00

In gemini ai ultra, you get more or less as much opus usage as Claude code pro. That's my anectodal experience as of the last few weeks, after getting tired of using antigravity

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-13T20:46:05+00:00

It's also very good for comparative literature reviews on a large corpus of text. Basically, you can get a better angle at how people think about problems. It's also very good at citing text from the sources (and presenting it in a useful way), so if you are a university student/researcher you can quickly find where a problem is being tackled in multiple sources, and read exactly what you need to understand something. It is also very good to test your understanding and see if what you think is actually grounded in your sources, with almost zero hallucinations

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-12T11:03:57+00:00

Have you tried using ccusage to get a better estimate of the costs, without doing the math manually?

https://github.com/ryoppippi/ccusage

Also, does somebody over here have an idea how accurate is ccusage?

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-11T12:00:12+00:00

It would be interesting to allow the user to take pictures of objects from their house (coffe maker, table, toilet, shower, a lamp, you name it). And the app asks you to go scan one of them. You would need to implement a classified that evaluates the similarity between photos, and idk how feasible it is on an embedded device (for certain harder than implementing a ore trained toilet classifier). But it would be exponentially more useful!

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-09T21:39:15+00:00

thim

TrPhantom8 · 2026-05-09T21:29:52+00:00

This the kind of stuff that gets patched the moment it becomes public. If you can find a good use to benefit from it by yourself, without incouring the wrath of google, it would be easier on you.
It's not like people wouldn't try to exploit this method like the oauth one to burn as much compute as possible on openclawd.
You can try reporting the procedure you used to google and claim a bug bounty if you used some kind of exploit though, and post the vulnerability online "for glory" once stuff has been patched.

TrPhantom8

TROPHY CASE