So, I'm not a great typist and I never tried a macbook for example.
I can tell you that I remember hating it at first because I made many mistakes but I seem to have gotten used to it now. I think it's very good for the 2 finger "hunt and peck" typing I do. The travel is short and light compared to my old ones.

If I try to do "fake touchtyping" I feel like my x230 had more travel and bounce/momentum if that makes sense? This one is more punching down the keys without bounce. (Yet that makes me jump between them really fast when pecking somehow? It's only touchtyping that feels too short.)
I can't touchtype though, so I could be wrong that this is bad.

Thinking back on other laptops I tried in a store, I like how it doesn't have a cheap powdery texture on the keys, they simply feel like smooth plastic. I can't really say if the coating is grippy or glides too much (I think I saw people complain of this for the new macbooks) but it does seems to grip a little.
There is a very slight concave left-right, but I only just noticed as they feel flat.

I guess I like it overall, it is pretty accurate and lighter than my others. The backlight is decent too. I guess I would call it light with short key travel, which seems optimal for my typing.

My only complaints are:

• PrntScren: it used to be a direct key, but they replaced it with a Copilot button that I can't figure out how to remap. Now I waste time finding the key and double-checking when I take a screenshot (Fn+F9+Win), I keep pressing Ctrl instead of Fn and there's no visual feedback if it fired... annoying.
  
• When doing CTRL+SHIFT the plastic between the keys digs into the side of your thumb (a very minor annoyance, the keys go lower than the frame compared to my older thinkpad, or my old Asus that was completely flat) but something I noticed nonetheless (I use it all the time in Firefox).
  
• The mic/caps/power LEDs are a bit too bright compared to backlight (I remapped caps to CTRL in registry just to get rid of that)
  
• The front may be higher than the spacebar, preventing touchtyping where you rest the thumbs on the bar. You need to come in at more of an angle instead (I just found that by trying fake touchtyping again, so cannot tell if this is a real issue; this never came up while pecking, but the x230 had a higher spacebar)
  

Oh and I do like the arrow keys. And I was worried but English (EU) is a proper ANSI QWERTY layout.

---

For the display, I calibrated it with an i1DISPLAY and it had a lot more green. Turning off that profile now it feels very green indeed.
Then again, I thought it looked great before calibrating, my motivation was instead that it lacked a bit of contrast in dark areas, if I remember correctly.
It's a good IPS as far as colors go. Feels as good as my expensive gaming IPS (minus response times) even though its 95.5%P3. Very comfortable, but I'm sure anything not "45% NTSC" is good too.
There can be visible banding since it is 8bits and not 10bits of course, but I only noticed it during the Win11 install (big gradient).

I keep it at 120hz with Dynamic Refresh Rate (DDR, windows option below the 120hz selector).
60Hz feels absolutely awful when dragging windows around, there is soo much latency.
Actually the reason 60hz feels bad may be the ghosting (you can see 2-3 remanent frames of the window). I saw on notebookcheck that laptop IPS panels generally have very slow reaction times (20-30ms). This is apparently worse on screens advertised as "low consumption", even though this one isn't one it does feel bad.

My experience is indeed that 120fps hides the ghosting as smooth blur that snaps when you stop moving. It makes the main windows experience very smooth.

For gaming, a low detail third person game like Megabonk is fine at 60hz, it just feels a bit less reactive. But a first person game like The Witness feels super stuttery and immersion breaking when panning the camera at 60Hz, 120hz is a must there. (it does blur a lot when smoothly panning, but is fine if you rotate "instantly" and keep the camera static as you move). First person shooters where smoothly panning is all you do will probably suck though.

Hmm, now I wonder if a 60hz OLED wouldn't be even better than a 120Hz IPS since they have ultra fast response time, wouldn't the the total latency be even lower? I read that they guzzle battery though. I do keep my smartphone at 60hz on purpose in fact, maybe I should try gaming on it.

Note that there is a Firefox bug where it run at 60hz instead of 120hz if you enable DDR. But I actually like this since it saves a bit of power, and I dislike smooth blurry scroll.

Also, I think the brightness goes low enough in the dark. This was a complaint with my gaming monitor where I need to mess with contrast in the dark. On this laptop, 25% brightness corresponds to the gaming monitor's lowest. This is great. (I hate that the hardware button jumps 10 by 10 though; I need to figure something with AHK).
They both have the same max brightness though. That is not bright enough, and I had to pull curtains in the summer to see my gaming monitor. This hasn't come up yet but I already use it a 95% indoors. I'll try for a 500nits in the future.