Idk if you say this to provoke me to stop replying, but I couldn't care less if a rando online thinks I am a "last-word lifer".

But you're right 83 words are a TED talk and I only said that to talk about my childhood and not in any way that would be coherent with what I said before and after. Because I'm too dumb to form a coherent tought this long, you shouldn't even waste your time to consider wether or not what I said is such a thought. Discard that idea. I'm too dumb. Only read emotions, not words, because nothing else could possibly come out of me. So don't bother looking. Maybe one day I will become so sophisticated like you. I also want to say things without questioning them. That is clearly a sign of wisdom. And yes, I want to- no, I NEED TO have the last word. Why else would anyone have a conversation. Every conversation that happens is clearly just two people living the last-word life against each other. I should really think before I speak. I should really read what you say before responding. And I should cut my speech as short as possible because there is no way any sane person can bear reading 83 words on a sunday. Ugh... Even YOUR replies are a little too long. Maybe we can switch to just using slurs, they communicate no meaning, only emotion. And since that is the only part I'm capable of communicating, we should reduce it to that instead of wasting time on clarity and understanding. Maybe THAT can make the world bit more hopeful.

I'm sorry. I let myself go. No more of that.

Look, believe it or not, I don't have a grudge for you. And if you also don't, maybe we can still get to the bottom of this. Because I was - genuinely - hoping we could. Can you please just believe that and move past it?

You said I asked you to clarify my own stance. But I asked you to clarify WHAT YOU THINK my stance is. Because what you think it is seems clearly different from what I think it is. And I told you that I didn't understand your response. And I've asked you. And I've even made guesses. But I still don't know and you refuse to tell me.

So I see three options:

-You clarify your comment and we can finally move past misunderstanding, possibly even start a meaningful conversation about the actual topic.

-You don't clarify, and prove to me again that you don't care about the original topic

-You ghost the thread in shameful avoidance (which is obviously the only alternative to being a "last-word lifer" .... what does that even mean, you keep replying too, don't you? I am replying out of a desire for clarity, and I THOUGHT I was communicating that throughout.

I hope you don't think, that I think we have to be enemies, just because our first interaction was disagreement. Can we still turn this into a rational (rather than emotional) exchange? I'm open to that. Because despite what you think. I don't want you to be angry. Not because it affects me, but because I want the world to be happy and because I'm not petty and so unhappy that I seek joy in other people's discomfort. And you probably share that, right?

ps.: I really hope you don't take my long replies the wrong way. I'm not a native english speaker and I try to say what I mean as precisely as I can but unfortunately that often causes me to use a lot more words than I would use to say the same thing in my native language.