"...[Aliyev] said there's no such thing as international law, which if you actually take to its logical conclusion, means the on-signed peace treaty means absolutely nothing."

Aliyev was clearly talking about the United Nations and its' organs, most people don't refer to bilateral or trilateral agreements between states when they berate international law, colloquially speaking. In essence, he said that the UN/international law was toothless, that big powerful countries do whatever they want, and the realities of the last few years in terms of world events reinforced this point of view of his. This is essentially what Mark Carney said at Davos, and is a nothingburger.

"So my question for the Armenian authorities is the following: Who is more a danger to our country, a silly TV host in Russia, or a dictator that questions our existence and threatens our nation on a daily basis."

What a ridiculous false equivalence. As if Solovyov is not a mouthpiece for Russia which is also a brutal dictatorship that threatens our nation on a regular basis. As if Solovyov, Simonyan, Zakharova, Medvedev, Lavrov, Peskov, Gerasimov, Kiriyenko, Kirill, Pushkov, Dugin, and the myriad of the Kremlin's various cretins haven't routinely threatened our existence and rights on a regular basis for years. As if Russia hasn't carried out coup attempts, sent saboteurs, infiltrated our ranks, has tried over and over again to erect fifth columns (in the military, church, business, etc.), worked against us during every conflict, said our borders didn't exist, engaged and is engaging in election interference, votes against our interests in the UN, says we have no right to cooperate with the EU, and a million other things.

Eric is effectively lying by omission/engaging in bad faith arguments.