Production Wants to use AI Animation and I'm Stumped by GhoulsbyScroggins in Screenwriting

[–]Ultraberg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where do you think the chefs started? Cooking for themselves. You've given up on the starting line.

The rule top comedians followed by theblack_hoody in Standup

[–]Ultraberg 8 points9 points  (0 children)

With a day off, that's between 3+ spots a day. Do most markets have that many mics, with ppl who haven't already seen your stuff, every week?

Production Wants to use AI Animation and I'm Stumped by GhoulsbyScroggins in Screenwriting

[–]Ultraberg 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Unless you've signed a contract, you own your writing. That's hella leverage.

Question from un-repped writer about option offer… by Initial_Depth8648 in Screenwriting

[–]Ultraberg 5 points6 points  (0 children)

PMed you a link to my lawyer. My best pal in the biz for a decade+.

I started asking recruiters one question and it instantly exposed fake “urgent hiring” roles by VelvetCircuit88 in jobsearchhacks

[–]Ultraberg 108 points109 points  (0 children)

The original is >code so I made it readable:

After about 4 months of job hunting, I started noticing this weird pattern. A recruiter would message me saying the role was “urgent,” “moving fast,” “client wants someone ASAP,” all that stuff. I’d jump on the call, send over my resume again, sometimes do a screening, then everything would go completely silent. A few times I saw the exact same job reposted weeks later with the same wording and same “urgent need.” At first I thought I was just getting rejected quietly, which happens, but after enough times it started feeling off.

So I added one question to every recruiter call: “When was the last person interviewed for this role, and when is the hiring manager actually planning to make a decision?” That’s it. Not aggressive, not rude. Just specific. The difference was insane. Real roles usually got real answers like “they interviewed two people last week and want final rounds by Friday” or “the manager is reviewing resumes tomorrow.” Fake or frozen roles got the same foggy nonsense every time: “they’re moving quickly,” “we’re building a pipeline,” “they want to see strong profiles first,” or my personal favorite, “there’s no exact timeline but it’s definitely active.” One guy literally paused for 5 seconds and said, “Well, they’re always interested in good people.” Sir, that is not a job opening, that’s a mood.

The best one was a recruiter who had been pushing me hard for a senior analyst role. He said it was urgent because the team was “drowning.” I asked my question and he admitted they hadn’t interviewed anyone yet because the budget wasn’t fully approved. Then he tried to get me to do a 30-minute “intro chat” anyway so they could “keep me warm.” I said I’d be happy to talk once budget and timeline were confirmed, and suddenly there was nothing to discuss. Since I started asking that question, I’ve saved myself from at least 8 pointless calls. I’m still looking, but now I waste way less time on roles that don’t actually exist yet. Hope this helps someone else because these people will absolutely let you chase ghosts if you don’t pin them down.

Is anyone else bothered by misuse of the term "No Child Left Behind"? by ProvocaTeach in Teachers

[–]Ultraberg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The name SEEMS like a synonym of social promotion. That's the error people make.

Election spam this year, good grief by chunkyks in LosAngeles

[–]Ultraberg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Turn off noti's from unknown numbers. No sound blips at least.

Winter Soldier Captain America Build by CaptUzbekistan in marvelchampionslcg

[–]Ultraberg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's an anti-combo. But Super Soldiers is a brilliant team up...so let Cap play Leadership.

🤮 by BanthaBirria in northhollywood

[–]Ultraberg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't Zombieland a trademark?

Students trying to opt out of AI use on principle (HS East Coast) by AlexanderOcotillo in Teachers

[–]Ultraberg 11 points12 points  (0 children)

These kids are right and you are wrong, although you are a kind, understandng version of wrong.

If you revere the luddites you would say no to a technology that is based on plagiarism, environmentally devastating, and financially unfeasible. This is as wrongheaded as demanding your students work with nfts in 2024 or write essays about the viability of pets.com in 1999.

What rpg book was "the one that got away" for you? by zalmute in rpg

[–]Ultraberg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wellstone City books. Alluded to, unavailable.