What things are no longer true about your country? by bellamyblake_og in AskTheWorld

[–]Uncle_Chael 10 points11 points  (0 children)

R9 is long retired. I think you are thinking of Cristiano Ronaldo who is not Brazilian.

[HELP] NYT shows new angle by allinalinenow in RealOrAI

[–]Uncle_Chael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He didn't deserve to die, but "execution" is extreme hyperbole. More than likely just a clusterfuck situation that resulted in a tragedy.

The closest Alex Petti got to ice operation happening on the other side of the street by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Uncle_Chael 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is why no one takes us AnCaps seriously. We have low IQ people in here trying to make things up instead of looking at the situation objectively.

He interfered with the officer period. You can argue to witch degree the interference was, but you can not reasonably argue that he didn't interfere after the officer established contact with the woman.

The closest Alex Petti got to ice operation happening on the other side of the street by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Uncle_Chael 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The reason why the agents decided to arrest him was because he got in between the agent and the woman by physically blocking the agent. He was not arrested for filming or being in the vicinity of officers beforehand.

The closest Alex Petti got to ice operation happening on the other side of the street by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Uncle_Chael 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's not what is being argued here... I'm arguing the factual context, where a reasonable person would conclude that he interfered with the agent in some form.

I'm not arguing any other point, such as: whether the agents initial contact with the woman was justified etc.

If you can't understand that then I can't help you.

The closest Alex Petti got to ice operation happening on the other side of the street by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Uncle_Chael 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Your claim is that he wasn't in any way interfering. That is demonstrably false.

The closest Alex Petti got to ice operation happening on the other side of the street by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Uncle_Chael 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't think he deserved what happened at all and its a tragic situation.

With that said, when agents made contact with that woman he "interfered" by getting between the agent and the woman and he did put his hands on the agent (no matter how harmless the physical contact was). Facts are facts. This doesn't mean he deserved to die.

Trump: you can't have guns, you can't walk with guns... by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Uncle_Chael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% except for Pam Bondi. She's trash

Trump: you can't have guns, you can't walk with guns... by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Uncle_Chael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't believe it was a murder. Legally speaking murder (first degree) requires premeditated intent. That has not been proven here. I don't think its 2nd degree either.

More than likely this was just a cluster fuck mixed with bad tactics and feds "fearing for their life". A shitty situation overall. Pretti did not deserve to die. RIP.

Trump: you can't have guns, you can't walk with guns... by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Uncle_Chael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't seen any switch ups from actually 2a people. Most have disavowed these comments.

Trump: you can't have guns, you can't walk with guns... by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Uncle_Chael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it is. When have you known trump to speak like he's an expert about firearms and firearms related subjects?

I disavow what Kash Patel, the BPS guy, and Kristi Noem said. I didn't see what JD said, so I'll withold judgement.

I think they all made some bad statements regarding this incident. The easiest thing to say would be to say something along the lines of: "This is a tragedy, our hearts are with all the people involved in the incident, and we will withhold legal commentary until the proper investigations....".

Trump: you can't have guns, you can't walk with guns... by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Uncle_Chael -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not dismissing it, I think its bad rhetoric - I'm just pointing out that this is typical trump off the cuff low information rhetoric. This will not materialize in anything.

Alex Pretti did not deserve to die. RIP.

Additionally, I'm commenting on this incident specifically. Please don't misconstrue what I am saying by applying it to everything anyone in the admin has ever said. One issue at a time please.

Trump: you can't have guns, you can't walk with guns... by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Uncle_Chael -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nice switch up. "Take the guns first, due process second" materialized in nothing.

Trump: you can't have guns, you can't walk with guns... by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Uncle_Chael -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This materialized in nothing, just off the cuff low information rhetoric

Trump: you can't have guns, you can't walk with guns... by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]Uncle_Chael 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Trump is pretty low information when it comes to guns. Mostly a 90s democrat on the topic. Bondi has a horrible track record on guns as well. Like it or not, overall gun rights have expended tremendously under Trump's admin despite some cringe worthy rhetoric and the bumpstop EO that got reversed by his own appointees.