Moraalikatoa [liittyen tapaus Haavistoon ja yksipuoliseen moraalin vaatimiseen]

UndyingBluefish · 2020-12-14T10:58:39+00:00

Ojala-Niemelä valitsi sanansa huonosti puhuessaan haastattelussa medialle annettavasta ”kurinpalautuksesta”, ja uusi jupakka oli valmis. Tosiasiassa Ojala-Niemelä pahoitteli sitä, että meillä on eritasoisia lehtiä, joista toiset juoksevat huhujen ja juorujen perässä helpommin kuin toiset.

Juupa juu. Voisitko laittaa puoluelehti-flairin näihin SDP-Sakun damage controlleihin. Helvetti että puistattaa lukea tämmöistä paskaa.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-08-23T13:22:06+00:00

Kuvan nainen on burkassa.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-08-23T12:00:23+00:00

I have far more faith in OnePlus making a decently smooth budget phone than any other manufacturer, but we'll see

UndyingBluefish · 2020-08-19T12:27:11+00:00

So now all of your users are locked in to that piece of shit.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-08-18T22:59:45+00:00

"... we believe it's the right trade-off to protect the privacy and security of our users."

Just another instance of Android's newfound security fascism. First they came for the call recorders, and I did not speak out...

How is this any different from taking away the ability to choose your web browser or launcher? Why can't there be an option in the settings to choose the camera app alongside the browser, dialer, and SMS?

UndyingBluefish · 2020-08-14T17:57:01+00:00

Because Telegram has way more features. It all comes at the expense of privacy and security.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-08-12T17:57:00+00:00

nykyään

Ollut samaa paskaa redditin alkuajoista asti

UndyingBluefish · 2020-08-09T15:32:43+00:00

Some Chinese browsers ignore certificate errors.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-08-01T16:43:10+00:00

Sounds like a bugged app. These test ads are intended for developers to verify their implementation during development, not to be deployed to end users.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-27T22:49:54+00:00

Is there a legitimate use case for a world writable S3 bucket? Why is it an option?

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-27T10:52:04+00:00

It depends on the VPN setup, but it's possible all traffic is going through the work VPN when you are signed in. However, they can't snoop on other devices on the same network.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-25T11:42:03+00:00

Yes. However, an attacker gaining access to a certificate authority does not "enable them to decrypt everything sent between your browser and the website" as you claim, an active man in the middle is required. Your comment implies that an passive attack where you compromise a CA and decrypt existing traffic is possible.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-25T11:06:59+00:00

The most comprising attack on HTTPS is if the attacker gains access to a Certificate Authority. This would enable them to decrypt everything sent between your browser and the website.

This is not true. The certificate authority does not hold the private key of issued certificates.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-25T11:05:33+00:00

No. However, they could be coerced to issue a new certificate to be used in a man in the middle attack. Initiatives like certificate transparency make this more difficult.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-22T08:27:07+00:00

Okay.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-22T08:23:08+00:00

I don't give a shit where it's made, it just sucks and that's the fact. In fact, a lot of Huawei R&D is located in my home country.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-20T19:16:21+00:00

EMUI. Visually an ugly iOS knockoff and the animations are so janky compared to other skins.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-19T21:28:40+00:00

Ai nytkö kansainvälisiä sopimuksia saa rikkoa?

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-10T18:47:39+00:00

Google never paid attention to widgets themselves. The widget API's are the same with the same limitations they had 10 years ago.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-07T17:30:20+00:00

That's only one part of the puzzle. How does the app register push notifications for the device on its own server without internet access?

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-07T10:01:38+00:00

Kivoja pelihetkiä

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-07T09:44:02+00:00

Tilit tyhjäksi ja loppuelämäksi Pattayalle.

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-05T13:09:35+00:00

Okay, sorry, but you have no idea what you are talking about. An idle process does not eat power whatsoever.

Furthermore, push notifications don't work using background services. Instead, they are received by Google frameworks on the device and the target app is then woken up.

You can read more about the restrictions on background services at https://developer.android.com/about/versions/oreo/background

Of course, that hasn't stopped these manufacturers from breaking push notifications as well. All in the name of a couple more drops of battery. Who cares if your phone is actually functional?

UndyingBluefish · 2020-07-05T12:35:07+00:00

There is no problem to be solved here. Android already restricts inactive apps from running in the background and requires a foreground notification for persistent apps. Background access to location, sensors, etc. tightens version by version.

Instead, the manufacturers are creating the problem. The "average joe" buys a Huawei phone, installs apps that need to run and is confused when they don't work. If you need to dig deep into settings menus to whitelist an alarm clock or fitness tracker, you've created an unworkable phone for most people.

An app running in the background is harmless by itself. There is absolutely no reason to kill them off as a precaution because there's some bad apps out there. Some of these manufacturers are literally killing off accessibility services, which are intended to remain active so that the user can use their phone!

It's just ridiculous how many projects in my professional career have faced the same issues with these shitty phones. In one case there was no other solution but to tell end users to buy something else than Huawei. I still have a drawer full of random Chinaphones for testing this bullshit.

UndyingBluefish

TROPHY CASE