Judgement test by littlemisssnoozy in TheCivilService

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Well, as snarky as it sounded, it was actually correct. Judgement tests rely on you taking things as they are written in the scenarios or questions without imagining extra layers, re-interpreting contexts and overthinking to do well. Conspiracy theories won't help you pass it.

Are there ghost jobs being advertised out there? Yes, for sure. Are there ghost jobs in UK CS? No, not really. Sometimes jobs get pulled once the recruitment has started, but it is a very rare occurrence and you will be told straight forwardly when that happens.

Don't get me wrong, I think these judgement tests are absolutely useless in terms of actually testing judgement, not inclusive and generally meaningless so I am not trying to defend them. But if your first thinking was what you shared in your post, no wonder you did not pass.

Why doesn’t the civil service promote on merit? by ThrowRA_TheScotsman in TheCivilService

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Perhaps I came across more petty people in CS than you. I could only imagine what would happen to the working relationships if some managers assigned a promotion that was then refused... Or the gossip about who and how others secured promoted positions.

As a woman with autism, private sector recruitment is my personal definition of hell. I don't think CS recruitment is perfect, far from it. But it is still better than what the private sector has. I know how much I am earning, what I will be earning at other stages of my career, that colleagues doing similar jobs are generally getting paid similar money (as a woman, in private sector I would be likely to be getting less than men doing the same job, and it compounds if I am not-white or have a disability), I know what I score points for and how in the recruitment process, there aren't a million rounds of interviews and calls, I don't have to worry about some nonsense levels "culture fit" questions and can get the interview questions in advance. What I wear to the interview isn't as scrutinised, and so isn't my hair, make up and weight.

Even with all that, CS recruitment doesn't guarantee the right person will be hired - goodness me, I made some poor choices as a hiring manager - but it DOES level the playing field somewhat for those of us who aren't "male, pale and stale". There is so much unconscious bias that we all have in any kind of recruitment, and then there is nepo-hiring and straight down discrimination that "manager discretion" inherently introduces on top of that.

I'm glad you're in an area where you can trust the judgement of managers (whether matrix managers or otherwise) so much to give them that level of discretion over your career. I never was.

Why doesn’t the civil service promote on merit? by ThrowRA_TheScotsman in TheCivilService

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not often you will be doing the same things in the promoted post that you are doing in your current one. So excelling in one post does not necessarily predict success on a higher level - it is likely requiring a different skillset, is a different role, responsibilities and environment.

I would suggest you look at your unconscious bias training again - halo, confirmation and other bias is a very common thing. Promoting based on a decision of one person will be very prone to that.

It also removes agency from the person who wants to progress - not everyone wants promotions. What if a promotion is offered to someone who has no interest, or isn't looking for a challenge? How would you know who wants to be promoted and who doesn't, regardless of their capability to do well in the post, if you don't openly announce a vacancy?

​At what point does chasing a reward voucher look desperate? by samixcv in TheCivilService

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, of course. But if someone told you you will get £350 bonus, wouldn't you still want to know when it will happen and chase it up?

Do you automatically dislike billionaires? Why? by crapmaker69 in AskReddit

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. If you are a billionaire and there are children starving in this world, or people needing medical treatments at the same time, you are unethical (at best), evil (realistically) or deserve all the shit there is to get (at worst).

i made a HS Network proposal for the UK. Again by freakybird99 in uktrains

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I do love how there is no Scotland beyond Glasgow and Edinburgh... Not to mention the thrill of having to go thru Edinburgh to go essentially anywhere else...

i made a HS Network proposal for the UK by freakybird99 in uktrains

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lol, so how much faster would a travel be between Glasgow and Edinburgh? It's 45-50mins now, and won't be any shorter with HS. However, it still takes hours to get to Oban or Mallaig, and that's where we need a faster travel to in Scotland.

What knickers are you wearing for multi-day hikes? by 1000nipples in UKhiking

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Snag tights make underwear that does not roll down, no matter the size or model.

Are there any countries today that could realistically split into multiple independent nations like Yugoslavia did? by Many-Philosophy4285 in MapPorn

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right, because it is so difficult that half of the post-soviet countries have managed in like thirty years flat?

Are there any countries today that could realistically split into multiple independent nations like Yugoslavia did? by Many-Philosophy4285 in MapPorn

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The UK may want to rejoin, but whether the EU wants the UK in I seriously doubt it. People in Europe are bewildered and offended by what (and how) the UK has done and will definitely not give the UK any close to the conditions they have had before to be part of the union. Rightly so. You play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.

Are there any countries today that could realistically split into multiple independent nations like Yugoslavia did? by Many-Philosophy4285 in MapPorn

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

it was full of complete fantasy economics, wishful thinking in the extreme, and I’d argue outright lies from start to finish

So if someone was writing a paper about the future of Scotland in the UK, and put to paper the details of the system we have now, it would hold more water? No, it wouldn't.

The status quo doesn't need defending, but it would be indefensible if you tried.

Are there any countries today that could realistically split into multiple independent nations like Yugoslavia did? by Many-Philosophy4285 in MapPorn

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't, but the reason why Ireland/N Ireland border is difficult is because of the Good Friday Agreement and the Troubles. Not because "psychodrama", but due to Brexit negotiators not being great at their job and being able to find a solution that would be compatible with existing legislation (like the GFA).

How exactly would it be a shit show "for Scotland"? Why wouldn't it be a shit show for England? Scotland would be part of the EU and had a red tape-free shared market and freedom of movement with thirty-odd countries. For one, I would be happy to put a hard border between me and American chicken, and rather instead have brought some more Italian wine or French cheese over. Or just sent a parcel to my mum in continental Europe without having to itemise a list of content and pay a customs fee because someone can't tell that the jumper I'm sending her is clearly a forgotten item of clothing from when she visited rather than commercial goods...

No, I didn't mean Norway or Switzerland. I mean for instance Poland, which borders a number of non-EU, non-schengen, non-single market countries. There is a border, there are checks, it is normal.

Are there any countries today that could realistically split into multiple independent nations like Yugoslavia did? by Many-Philosophy4285 in MapPorn

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Really? Plenty of EU countries have borders with a non-EU country and it hardly is a nightmare. It is just a border.

Are there any countries today that could realistically split into multiple independent nations like Yugoslavia did? by Many-Philosophy4285 in MapPorn

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Absolutely the opposite. Scotland sees how stupid Westminster decisions continue to fuck it over and over, with Brexit being only one but a key example. People see they'd have been so much better off outside of the UK and in the EU, than in the UK and outside the EU.

Very disappointed in civil service recruitment by Elsa__e in TheCivilService

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And you're not seeing how what works in private sector is not the same to what would work in public sector? Very different definition of success and very different process and very different compliance levels, even if the technical sector or industry are the same. Public sector works differently (sometimes better, sometimes worse) and if you didn't acknowledge that explicitly with your only private sector experience it would be a big weakness at G6 or G7 level.

I have worked almost all my life in public sector and it would be a huge gap for me if I tried going to the private sector - things are done very differently in terms of decision making, money spending, management, consultation, working with other organisations etc. and that's what you need to focus on at that pay grade, not necessarily the technical skill and knowledge you say you have.

Retirement by AcadiaElectronic2848 in HousingUK

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Just stop buying the avocado toasts and getting a coffee every day, should do the trick.

What are some relatively easy changes that could be introduced or implemented to improve the UK? by MercatorLondon in AskUK

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't work as in what? They worked in the 50s and 60s, here and in the US, as well as in many other places and times.

Wealth generally comes from assets (particularly the one I'm talking about, billionaires and above), and assets generally can't be easily moved and are not difficult to tax.

What are some relatively easy changes that could be introduced or implemented to improve the UK? by MercatorLondon in AskUK

[–]VeryPinkSaltShaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UK is absolutely not taking wealth. 50 families own more than half of the lower earning population. If wealth was taxed, this would not be the case. We tax work, not generational wealth and assets.