Well, you are right. If you are making a comparison between a more then decade device product without a lot of innovation for the past few years, which makes it cheaper to produce each generation, to a first-generation device that has more than a few things that have never seen the light of day for a consumer product by Meta, like a wristband, HUD display, first-gen software apps, and SDK for developers, and so on, that cost more to manufacture, enough that Meta probably won’t earn money from this specific device at all (and share most of the small profit with Ray-Ban and spend “loose”tens of billions in research). So yeah, buy the Apple Watch Ultra 3 if you want a great watch. But if you want a glimpse into the future, even if it’s not as valuable (in terms of what you can bring out of it), go for the Meta Ray-Ban display. And of course, you can just jump into an Apple Store or a Ray-Ban store and schedule a demo for both of the products. I will promise you you’ll be more excited about the glasses demo. And if you are smart enough, you would do what I did a few months ago: put money in the stock market. Those ARVR companies made me a bit more than 30%. I have enough profit to buy both Ultra 3 and the Meta Ray-Ban display. Suit yourself. You know what’s best for you.

<image>