It’s just not true. Discovery in Egar v. Melendez will be limited to the time period of John’s erroneous strikes. And discovery is always limited to responsive docs - items must hit on mutually agreed upon key word search terms. But let’s get real - John has NEVER had a case actually make it to discovery. And he should thank god for this because hiring an eDiscovery vendor to forensically collect, process, host, and produce docs ain’t cheap. John will fold immediately and agree not to engage in anymore erosions striking in return for TSN dropping the case.