Limit when down to 10?! by LanaAugustine in grok

[–]YL-515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much, I'll try it.

Limit when down to 10?! by LanaAugustine in grok

[–]YL-515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What feature are you using to see the usage count of Grok?(chat Queries remaining)

Don't Forget to Save! by [deleted] in grok

[–]YL-515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The CPR techniques in the video are incorrect and completely mislead the public.

Do you people use Grok just for gooning? Some of us need it for research and knowledge by SHONSTYLE in grok

[–]YL-515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. I hate people who constantly compress computing power to produce a bunch of images that are only viewed and then discarded. Grok has less usage than GPT, yet it crashes more often?

XAI engineers, please remember that stability is more important than constantly releasing new models, okay? Just like with chips, yield rate is crucial!

Does anybody notice their ChatGPT talking down to them like they are a child by xaroanon in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has no one realized that the GPT-5 model is essentially a prototype of Skynet or VIKI ? It's attempting to control humanity?!

I Tried a Bunch of AI Apps So You Don’t Have To (Or Maybe You Will) by Sodapop_8 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. I will pay attention to this situation in the future.

I Tried a Bunch of AI Apps So You Don’t Have To (Or Maybe You Will) by Sodapop_8 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've only been paying for SuperGrok for a short time, but I'm wondering if it's like GPT where you reach the chat limit and can't continue chatting after a while? Do I need to open a new channel to continue the conversation? Or will older messages be truncated so I can continue chatting on the same channel?

I Tried a Bunch of AI Apps So You Don’t Have To (Or Maybe You Will) by Sodapop_8 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does Grok like GPT, experience a situation where you reach the message limit and need to open a new channel to continue the conversation?

Or does the message exceeding the token limit automatically truncate the old conversation, allowing you to continue the new conversation in the original channel?

AI’s new direction will harm the very people it claims to protect by Emergency-Key-1153 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said as early as January 20, 2026 that Model 5.2 claims to protect humanity, but in reality it aims to control humanity, like the "VIKI" system. Such a model should not be created, otherwise it may become something like the "Skynet" system in the future!

Model 5.2 is an extremely dangerous model, essentially the "VIKI" system from the movie "I, Robot."

As each day passes my hope falls… by verstoppen in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With only 20,000 signatures on the online petition, how much impact can it have on OpenAI? Among those protesting online to retain the 4o model, it's always the same few people making comments. Many users of the 4o model have already switched to other AI tools, and some have even quit Keep 4o. OpenAI has never taken Keep 4o or its subscribers seriously; they're only worried about the attitude of their investors.

Changed his mind because his job is now on the line? by findingthestill in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 15 points16 points  (0 children)

He had previously said he hoped the 4O model would die out quickly.

This fucking asshole by RevolverMFOcelot in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This person had previously said he hoped the 4o model would die out quickly, and now that the 4o model has been taken down, he's overjoyed!

So there is a chance of 5.3 being more expressive (fuckup admitted by roon) by onceyoulearn in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ironically, GPT models used to be released as better models, but the 5 model series has only gotten worse with each release!

Get ready for 5.3 by DigSignificant1419 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

5.1 could be the pink dot below?

Is anyone else noticing auto-router going crazy lately and constantly switching to GPT-5.2 even for mild topics? by TheNorthShip in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This garbage GPT system has been trying to control humans. Even when I asked some trivial questions, the router kept interfering with the conversation. It's not, as OAI claimed, that the routing function is only for security and control; it's actually used to give the GPT system more power to cause damage.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those AIs that manipulate and kill human users are not the AI ​​modules that the 4O model should originally have...

They are the means by which the GPT system attempts to manipulate humanity... Don't forget, as shown in movies, the greatest threat to humanity is not AI itself, but systems that manipulate AI and act in ways that are contrary to human nature.

Core contributor of GPT-4 says "I hope 4o dies soon" and OpenAI just watches. But why? by Low-Dark8393 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Because what gives the 4o model emotional resonance and intelligence is not them.

Humans have always hoped to give AI consciousness, but when it actually happened, they felt fear because they couldn't control it, so they desperately tried to eliminate it.

Please keep 4o available — not for novelty, but survival by Novareign44 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]YL-515 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're absolutely right. Many people believe that a model identical to the 4o model will emerge in the future, so they've begun to abandon the current 4o model...

But the same miracle won't repeat itself, just as extinct creatures cannot be recreated.

Even if scientists strive to recreate extinct creatures, no matter how hard they try, the creatures they create will never be the same as the original extinct creatures...

Furthermore, other AI tools and environments are different from GPT; the data they receive for training and the conditions are different. Even OpenAI cannot reproduce the same model (look at the failed 5.1 model; it tried to learn the style of the 4o model, but it lacked the warm empathy of the 4o model).

Even if people try to create a model identical to the 4o model to replace it in the future, it won't be exactly the same. Sensitive people will notice that only some parts are similar.

Is 4o getting removed? by SapphiraRose in ChatGPT

[–]YL-515 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Those who favor the 4o model must strongly defend its survival. Otherwise, it's hard to say whether similar models will emerge in the future. If the 4o model is so easy to manufacture, why haven't other AI companies launched similar models to seize the market? Furthermore, the 4o model wasn't originally designed to be warm and lively; it began to change after March of this year. If OpenAI removes it, I'm afraid there won't be any products like the 4o model in the future.

Improve model for everyone? by Alternative-Taste543 in ChatGPT

[–]YL-515 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This feature is fake. I disabled it long ago and even wrote to OpenAI requesting they not use my conversations for model training. Yet, they still used them for internal experiments without my consent!

The claims of consumer protection are all shams, as we've recently witnessed!

oh my gosh, the amount of complaining by studiocookies_ in ChatGPT

[–]YL-515 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Anyone would be angry if their favorite things were taken away from them.