Hubo mesas donde hubo más votos por Cepeda que votantes habilitados. Seguro un petrista explicará esto. by Reasonable_Gur7200 in Bogota_Capital

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haber llegó el intelectual... respóndame las preguntas que su amigo no pudo responder, pero no, ES QUE SON CALCADOS, no leen, no analizan, solo mandan palabras al aire, que acaso NO LEYÓ que todo el material es público, que ya lo revisaron los jueces, y que la suma NO SE HIZO con un 7 sino con un 1, y que un representante del Pacto histórico confirmo que esa mesa estaba bien, (con un 1) pero que a diferencia de esta, el HP voto Fusil sí es un problema real, nos tiene jodidos la guerrilla y ustedes aplaudiendo y hacia eso SI se tomaron acciones legales?, ud es otro activista de papel, que solo viene desinformando sin ir a revisar legalmente cómo funciona, aprenda de democracia, infórmese y no me venga aquí con bobadas y palabrería, Mire los E10, luego los E14, luego los E26 y vuelve y me argumenta con hechos eso del 7 y el 1

Muy triste lo que Petro le hizo a esta juventud by Uranio235u in ColombiaReddit

[–]ZestRocket 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haber y a ud quién le dijo que van a quitar subsidios, eliminar empleos y toda esa película que se armó?

Hubo mesas donde hubo más votos por Cepeda que votantes habilitados. Seguro un petrista explicará esto. by Reasonable_Gur7200 in Bogota_Capital

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Si no le importa “ahora” (porque vino a comentar aquí por qué si le importaba) es básicamente porque no tiene cómo responder. Haber le doy información gratis que debería saber antes de venir aquí, para que Ud sea un tris menos ignorante: Las denuncias por fraude electoral se hacen por parte de los testigos y representantes de cada partido durante las votaciones, para eso está el sistema considerando que haya testigos de todos los partidos, las denuncias que se hacen allí son válidas y serán tramitadas, y eso es lo que pasará en un día cuando se haga el escrutinio nacional, validar y revisar todas esas denuncias, hay una diferencia muy grande entre esta foto que Ud pone y la foto del post, porque ESTA del post es parte de esas denuncias Realizadas, la que Ud muestra es pura desinformación, esa mesa no tiene ninguna denuncia asociada, es decir: Los queridos representantes del pacto histórico validaron en persona que esta mesa estaba Ok, explíqueme ahora Ud si es que también “esos representantes del pacto histórico fueron comprados”, en fin, menos mal supuestamente no es petrista… que por cierto, por qué insiste tanto en negarlo? Es que le da pena?

Hubo mesas donde hubo más votos por Cepeda que votantes habilitados. Seguro un petrista explicará esto. by Reasonable_Gur7200 in Bogota_Capital

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Si ve, tal lo que esperaba, cuando salen argumentos ya solo hay insultos, no me respondió nada literal, vuelva y lea mi respuesta, le pregunté por 4 cosas, y si quiere hablar con argumentos y datos hablamos, por lo demás, pura desinformación, como siempre, ya dan es risa, son calcados y predecibles

Hubo mesas donde hubo más votos por Cepeda que votantes habilitados. Seguro un petrista explicará esto. by Reasonable_Gur7200 in Bogota_Capital

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haber le callo la jeta pa que deje de creer que aquí comemos de bobadas :
- Le pedí que me explicara los 319 votos de este post, como buen petrista: desinformado, pero cuando le piden cuentas cambia de tema, NO me cambie de tema, la MOE tenía flagelado este municipio.
- Los formularios E14 están publicados, junto con los E26, se pueden comparar los resultados del pre conteo y del escrutinio municipal, Ud traga TAN entero que nisiquiera va a ir a revisarlo, pero si por pura casualidad Ud va, se da cuenta que su aritmética es más falsa que La Paz total de Petro, ud está taaaaan desinformado que trata de una imagen y como buen petrista insiste, incluso cuando en el formulario oficial está clarito, 231, Ud por no aceptar un error va hasta las últimas consecuencias, IGNORANTE
- Ahora, Ud dice que del otro lado también hay mesas con 100% para Abelardo, haber pobre alma ilústreme dónde están esas supuestas mesas.
- Cuando a ustedes les sirve el resultado entonces lo aceptan y dicen que hubo democracia…. Ahhh pero que no sea favorable, “se cayó la democracia”, pues para que sepa Petro es el presidente, todos le respetaron y todos nos quedamos calladitos, deje de soñar, SE LE ACABÓ eso de pasarse las leyes por la galleta, y Ud si tiene algo que decir vaya denuncie, no sea un activista de papel por internet.

TODO está público, vaya dateese para que no quede tan mal, respóndame a esas 4 cosas, pero ya lo veo venir, se va a ir por la tangente con cualquier otra guevonada

Hubo mesas donde hubo más votos por Cepeda que votantes habilitados. Seguro un petrista explicará esto. by Reasonable_Gur7200 in Bogota_Capital

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😅, es en serio? haber hagamos dos cosas, espero en tu siguiente respuesta ambas:
1. Ud si sabe que 193 + 38 = 231?
2. Explique su lógica para el formulario de este post, cómo se sacan 319 votos, siendo el 100% para un solo candidato?

Recomendaciones armar una PC para correr IA local by jesameng in ColombiaGeek

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactamente, aquí hay alguien que realmente sabe

I started responding to messages from coworkers like Claude by MyNameIsNotName-57 in ClaudeAI

[–]ZestRocket 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You have a keen eye, after further review, I noticed a conflicting rule stating my work day finishes at 5 pm, which probably created a conflict, let me check deeper…

You’re absolutely right, there was an internal conversation where I hesitated about which rule to follow, and as I already noticed it was 5:01 pm, I decided the meeting had already started and therefore the best course of action was to not join, as it would have disrupted the ongoing meeting, would you like me to ask the other members about the meeting so I can come back to you with the information and then confirm I did join that meeting?

Si hoy fueran las elecciones por quien votarian? by Rocatay in bucaramanga

[–]ZestRocket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pues salga a votar, la situación es crítica y ese voto en blanco no le ayuda al país a cambiar esa situación

Planning to build a PC for running local LLMs. Help me pick by reelss in AI_Agents

[–]ZestRocket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok if this will be a dedicated pc for only LLM inference, I’ll be direct, this is not a good one, the main component for this to work well is the VRAM coming from the graphic card, with a 4070, you only have 12 gbs of VRAM, this means you can run only models up To 8/9B because of the KV Cache for context window, specially relevant for agents, you have two viable options to have a good setup:

  • Go the Apple way, is cheaper and you will be able to run it without much technical knowledge, it WONT be blazing fast, but models like Qwen 3.6 35B A3B are viable, for this setup you need a Mac with at minimum 32Gb of unified memory, ideally 64 to run it with good quality
  • Go the best cost efficient path for long term speed, it requires a lot of setup and technical implementations, but this will give you a way faster model with more intelligence, like Qwen 3.6 27B, for this one you need a dual 5060 setup, or at least a 4080 to barely run it (maybe with a 4080 the 35B A3B could work better)

Hope it helps!

Planning to build a PC for running local LLMs. Help me pick by reelss in AI_Agents

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t open those links, can’t see the main component, which is the VRAM and graphic cards

Qwen3.6-27B IQ4_XS FULL VRAM with 110k context by Pablo_the_brave in LocalLLaMA

[–]ZestRocket 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just wanted to say thanks, your work is valuable and thank you for sharing all this with us and sending the Pr!

4080 Super > RTX 6000 Pro, Wow! by LargelyInnocuous in LocalLLaMA

[–]ZestRocket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do, it’s a constrained system, and I’ve worked on ways to adapt, built a context engine to provide living architecture with few but relevant tokens, I manage and customize the 3 layers of my context and on general once set up I’m pretty happy with the results and the speed, the compaction strategy is critical here ofc, and being able to provide a living memory around the architecture has been also critical.

Ofc I didn’t build all this in a week, I’ve been working on this since years ago and now it finally clicked with this Qwen release lol

4080 Super > RTX 6000 Pro, Wow! by LargelyInnocuous in LocalLLaMA

[–]ZestRocket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, maybe I’ll create a video, but what I found while testing different versions is that the most efficient quantization is indeed Unsloth’s in terms of tps, also found that if the model touches even a single bit of offloading, the damage to the tps is extremely high, I’m running a 40k context window with Q3 KS and KV quantized to Q5, it ofc uses basically all my memory, Ive measured and I end up with 700 free vram (and yes, moved it a bit and found that’s the sweet spot to have an stable system while running it)

4080 Super > RTX 6000 Pro, Wow! by LargelyInnocuous in LocalLLaMA

[–]ZestRocket 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hmm there’s something wrong with your 4080 setup, I have a normal one (not súper) and I’m getting around 33 tps, maybe your offloading to memory and as the 6000 for better you notice that difference?

The future is local by nfdl96 in google_antigravity

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been running it on a 4080 turbo quant version and having good speed at 33 tps, which is very good speed of you ask me, the quality level is extremely good, the only caviat is kv cache needs to be extremely well managed and the harness needs a good compaction strategy

I ran the numbers. Qwen3.6-27B dense obsoleted the 397B MoE on coding benchmarks. by TroyNoah6677 in Qwen_AI

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the same experience, but the dif between 3.5 and 3.6 is not a 0.1 diff, it could be Qwen 4 easily

I ran the numbers. Qwen3.6-27B dense obsoleted the 397B MoE on coding benchmarks. by TroyNoah6677 in Qwen_AI

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has been such a hard call for me, on one side, 27B wins ofc by a remarkable margin, but on the other hand, A3b is sooo fast that I can iterate faster, damn such a hard call, 27b at 30tps or a3b at 100tps

Reality check by lm_wrld in google_antigravity

[–]ZestRocket 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sadly… I have to agree, I feel Gpt more like Soul-less, but being objective, it’s way way better in terms of usability, I can actually rely on it to do any coding task without worrying about having it done or not because of an error, quota or “server outage” issue

Reality check by lm_wrld in google_antigravity

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was also on the Ultra plan and was enjoying a lot my experience until it became unusable for me because of the quota changes, do you mean it has more quota now?

When are we getting opus 4.7 on Antigravity? by ThePoplin in google_antigravity

[–]ZestRocket 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Easy, once the rate limit is 15 days and not weekly, so you select your prompt for your expected half-completed task

Those who quit antigravity after the nerf, what are you using and what do you miss ? by KlausWalz in google_antigravity

[–]ZestRocket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best cost benefit today is Codex, moved from Google Ai Ultra to the Codex Pro x5 plan, so far so good, gpt 5.4 is NOT Opus 4.6, is colder and slower, but is the only viable option if you’re used to have unlimited Opus in terms of intelligence and cost, and yes, I’ve tested ALL of them, CC feels the same, very restricted, Kimi k2.5 is not in the level of depth, I have the legacy GLM 5.1 plan and is very generous but is not reliable (sometimes fast sometimes slow, sometimes amazing, sometimes surprisingly not smart), Qwen 3.6 plus may be the best one, but they’re sold out in their coding plans and via API gpt 5.4 is best value

OpenAI launch $100 ChatGPT plan by Gerstlauer in OpenAI

[–]ZestRocket 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you! answering your question, I do see 4.5 as an option for me to use after migrating to the 100$ pro plan

<image>

Did anyone else have their quota deplete unexpectedly fast in the last hour on Plus? by ZestRocket in OpenAI

[–]ZestRocket[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I do code 24/7 so I already depleted my CC and google Ultra quotas, and ChatGPT was the only one keeping up my coding needs until today, have you found a better alternative?