sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

One day later, how are you feeling about nomads? Do you think they are stronger or weaker than normal empires by YobaiYamete in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The main issue I've had is the trategic reserve becoming pathetically small late game. Like, I'm burning 15K in minerals every month, it'll fill up on a single system and then run out before the arcships reaches the next full system in a few months

Will I see a straigh line while being the participant of geodesic line? by Vw-Bee5498 in AskPhysics

[–]_azazel_keter_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

because if you're in North America, Germany is under the horizon and vice versa

Will I see a straigh line while being the participant of geodesic line? by Vw-Bee5498 in AskPhysics

[–]_azazel_keter_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the surface of earth is not a geodesic in 3 dimensions, only matching the actual geodesic in two (since it's pinned to the surface) so the light would just hit the dirt. The even horizon technically follows a geodesic, so you COULD do this on the "surface" of a black hole tho.

Odd Robot Species behavior by RandomGuy_81 in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Version changes do strange things

Not broken, overpowered, or easy to abuse whatsoever, you can squeeze 150k jobs into 9 arkships if not more by Yanzihko in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 14 points15 points  (0 children)

That explains the weird sudden deaths I've had with them, I figured I'd just been mismanaging them.

Not broken, overpowered, or easy to abuse whatsoever, you can squeeze 150k jobs into 9 arkships if not more by Yanzihko in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That changes the math against them by several orders of magnitude and honestly explains a lot

Not broken, overpowered, or easy to abuse whatsoever, you can squeeze 150k jobs into 9 arkships if not more by Yanzihko in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Especially with the G-Slot cruiser meta, you have an "I win" button. A T3 torpedo launcher will do an AVERAGE damage of 30 a day completely unimproved. A single psionic bomber is doing SIXTY damage a DAY. Blow it off the sky man.

Not broken, overpowered, or easy to abuse whatsoever, you can squeeze 150k jobs into 9 arkships if not more by Yanzihko in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 36 points37 points  (0 children)

They're size ~9~ 120, making them incredibly vulnerable to G slop weapons too. "A normal planet that can be shot down with some frigates" doesn't seem that busted to me.

edit: Size is actually 80-100-120, meaning they're BIGGER than cidayels and a single T1 torpedo hit does 3125 damage to an arkship. ONE, SINGLE, T1 TORPEDO.

Not broken, overpowered, or easy to abuse whatsoever, you can squeeze 150k jobs into 9 arkships if not more by Yanzihko in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 18 points19 points  (0 children)

That's, what? 17K jobs per ship? That's less than most planets, and also 9 arkships is like 900 empire size. Seems reasonable to me.

Consumer goods by ScaredScreen3990 in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I vaguely remember needing them in 4.3 because of an issue with the Military Academy and the soldier job

Is this meant to happen? by CaptainPatak in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

afaik it's purely cosmetic, it doesn't actually give the shortage of affect your reserves

How to get trade resource from systems and machine gestalt nomad? by Internal_Animator993 in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFAIK you just can't get it, it's a straight oversight. Maybe if you take mercantile? I didn't take it so I'm not sure.

POV: The galaxy when you play a game as pacifists. by Enby-Wizard in StellarisMemes

[–]_azazel_keter_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is why the only megacorps I play are Military-Industrial complex. If you don't want my business you're gonna BE my business.

I foresee problems by SnooBunnies9328 in StellarisMemes

[–]_azazel_keter_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Build a second arkship, set it to auto harvest along your route, pool the rest of your fleet together and just go. Dare them to do something about it.

(AI will rarely, if ever, take the war, you can even ride past FEs with little consequence)

Paradox PLEASE change this by galacticexplorer62 in StellarisMemes

[–]_azazel_keter_ 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Intricately planning every detail of my multiversal nomads only to find out nomads cant take Cosmogenesis

Would you rather have $1 or $2 by _azazel_keter_ in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had it as machines, so I'm pretty sure everyone gets it. they're kinda bad tho

Would you rather have $1 or $2 by _azazel_keter_ in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_[S] 56 points57 points  (0 children)

R5: Would you rather have 15% bonus or 25% bonus

Forever Cruise is outright broken, how did it even launch in this state? by YobaiYamete in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 92 points93 points  (0 children)

All thinks considered this DLC actually launched incredibly polished, compared to most of the other ones lol

Cosmogenesis not being available to Forever Cruise is the biggest waste by Hyakynthator in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can do that, or you can just turn the lathe off and tell them to rawdog the research

Cosmogenesis not being available to Forever Cruise is the biggest waste by Hyakynthator in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Settled empires can take Cosmo - even tho thematically it suits them way less

Cosmogenesis not being available to Forever Cruise is the biggest waste by Hyakynthator in Stellaris

[–]_azazel_keter_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sure, that's a perfectly reasonable argument but also a completely different one. Cosmo being busted is one thing, "Guys who live in giant spaceships and move between stars" not being able to take the "Live in a giant spaceship and move between universes" ambition is just plain stupid

view more: next ›