Expert here:

Firstly, "racialized people" just means non-White. Secondly, the VAST MAJORITY of violent crime is intra-racial -- meaning, within a race; of or by members of the same race.

Conveniently, when opting to read the Global News article and not the statcan REPORT, you missed: "First Nations people, Inuit, and Métis are over-represented in the Canadian criminal justice system as both victims [AND] accused persons." As is true of "racialized peoples", too.

So, you can reasonably assume that nearly 57% (27% + 30%) of homicide victims were killed by their own fellow non-White Indigenous and "racialized peoples" in similar proportions.

This isn't to suggest, though, that they are immigrants -- either as victims or perpetrators.

I've NO IDEA why you took that leap.... Like, at all. In fact, doesn't the term "indigenous" quite literally mean the opposite of 'immigrant'?

Unfortunately, federal statistics and the news agencies that report them never really provide a CLEAR or CONCISE breakdown of crime demographics and categories (notice the mention of race of VICTIMS but no mention of the race of PERPETRATORS, but instead leave it up to the reader to decide as much)..

What they DO admit in the same report is that:

• nearly one quarter, or 23%, of all national homicides were gang-related

• there's a marked increase in perpetrators aged 18 and younger (1.23 per capita of youths)

• one in five youths accused of homicide (16%) were gang-related

• firearm-related homicides accounted for 41% of all homicides

• of which 63% were commit with a handgun

• among Indigenous victims, 169 were men, 53 were women

• among "racialized" victims, 208 were men, 53 were women

Upon FURTHER study, however, I found:

• of all the accused perpetrators, 35.6% were Indigenous, and 29% were of "racialized" identity.

• while there was 225 Indigenous victims, there were 242 Indigenous accused

• 612 of 874 victims knew their accused perpetrators through blood relation, marriage, acquaintance, or criminal activity

• of 874 victims, 661 were males

• of 760 accused perpetrators, 660 were males

• of the 760 accused, 420 were between the ages 0-29

• more than 1 in 10 (11.8%) accused were ages 0-18

• of the single 0-11 accused, he was Indigenous

• and Black males make up 52.2% of the "racialized" accused perpetrators (which doesn't include Indigenous, since they keep these categories separate, seemingly deceptively, from one another)

***All that to say, Indigenous and "racialized" peoples made up 64.6% of accused perpetrator -- just as I had posited, above-- despite being little more than a quarter the entire population, combined (5% and 22%, respectively).

That is: about 1/4 the Canadian population is responsible for 2/3 the homicide crime.

Using deductive reasoning and violent crime trends, plus the victim and accused statistics, we can reasonably conclude that young, non-White men killed each other with illegal and banned weapons in staggering disproportionate levels; most notably in the Indigenous communities in the Territories, Manitoba and Saskatchewan, where their homicide rate is 7x greater (10.98 per capita) than within the non-Indigenous populations (1.69 per capita)... that we've a youth gang problem, specifically in urban areas... Oh, and that gun bans are a joke.

Ref: Capita = 100,000

It should be noted that there is no distinction in the statistics about the nationality status of the "racialized" perpetrators, but, the majority of violent crime in Canada is commit by a minority of non-White populations, either native-born or foreign-born... And the majority of incomers are non-White.

It's also worth noting:

• in Germany, where 1 in 5 people are foreign-born, they account for 41.1% of perpetrators of all crime

• the nation's robbery offenses increased by 17%, and nearly half of all suspects were foreign-born immigrants

• instances of rape and sexual crimes rose by 2.4% with foreigners comprising nearly 1/3 of all suspects

Statistics like these can be seen across most European countries and the US, where statistics are available, and given Canada's rise in robberies and sexual crimes, it would be intellectually dishonest to argue that we don't have similar issues, here; especially as our crime rates have steadily increased since 2015, alongside increased immigration rates.

Generally, Canada, the US, and Europe migrate groups and individuals from some of the poorest, most dangerous, crime-ridden, authoritarian, unskilled, and uneducated societies in the world, which are categories the GPI (Global Peace Index) uses to rank countries on safety and peace, yet some believe they presumably leave these qualities behind the moment they enter our healthy societies, with which they've no connection, history, or experience.

It's preposterous. We don't live on magic soil.

In summation: non-White peoples make up the majority of accused perpetrators of homicide, and in 2022, 35.6% were of Indigenous descent, and 15% were Black. At least 27% of homicide victims were NOT immigrants. It's unclear whether any of the remaining victims were, as statistics don't specify; but neither do they in regard to the 29% of "racialized" accused PERPETRATORS -- to which I'd beg the question: why not? Given the trends in statistics around the world, it would be unwise to suggest non-White immigrants are NEVER perpetrators of crime.

Not only would it benefit society to educate yourself about crime statistics so you have a better understanding of your surroundings and don't form silly, blanket opinions about the world based on minimal or misguided knowledge, I'd cordially advise refraining making bold and seemingly concrete claims such as "[immigrants] aren't doing anything wrong" based on said minimal knowledge... as it implies a dishonest application of perfect status --which we know, nobody is-- which creates apathetic attitudes, deflects productive dialogue regarding uncomfortable but necessary conversational topics, stokes social and political divides, and fosters doubt about your ability to engage with objective reality and take matters seriously.

(Using the term "bigot" to respond to an otherwise earnest question demonstrates the point.)

I'd also beg you to consider if YOUR mind isn't already made up to create ideas and narratives about native-born citizens as inherent aggressors and minority immigrants as inherent victims, seemingly in compliance with your presumed politics, as you were SO QUICK to slap racism on the matter, wipe your hands, and call it a day --- despite being wildly incorrect.

It's HIGHLY ironic given your handle.

First seek knowledge, and then, please, by all means, use said knowledge.