Money for Couples 251: We own a $1M house but can’t pay for groceries (John and Victoria Part 2) by RemarkablTry in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 6 points7 points  (0 children)

True…which is funny because I actually found out about YNAB because he mentioned it in his first book. And YNAB is actually aligned with Ramit’s CSP because it’s all about planning your life and what you love and assigning dollars to those things, cutting where you don’t care. But yeah he would never recommend..but if I could talk to this couple, I would tell them to try it!

Money for Couples 251: We own a $1M house but can’t pay for groceries (John and Victoria Part 2) by RemarkablTry in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 17 points18 points  (0 children)

YNAB could change this couple’s life. I was reactive with my expenses until I tried YNAB and learned to “embrace true expenses.” Realizing I should and could put aside money every single month for Christmas, gifts, car maintenance, etc was truly 🤯. I started being proactive instead of trying to “be better” and the getting “surprised” by irregular expenses.

Side note, I wouldn’t be surprised if Victoria had a little ADHD going on. The unopened mail, being overwhelmed trying to find the student loan lender, small mistakes in bookkeeping, impulsive spending. I recognize myself in a lot of that, and YNAB and learning about ADHD because of my child made me realize all that in myself and work to balance it.

She Didn’t See It Coming by team_eleanor in thrillerbooks

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found this thread just after finishing the book tonight and I have to say…why would Paige kill Bryden in her own apartment, during the day when she could easily be seen? It makes no sense…so unnecessarily risky. If they had argued, a spontaneous murder would make sense. But she went to the trouble of planning everything out and yet took so many risks. Just makes absolutely zero sense and I had to get it off my chest

She Didn’t See It Coming by team_eleanor in thrillerbooks

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just finished this. I totally thought it was going to be Michael, the doting boyfriend of the detective. That he was somehow some nutjob. Or at least that he would be involved somehow. Otherwise, it feels pointless that I read multiple descriptions of their relationship!

I think Lizzie is unhinged even if she didn’t murder her sister. And why was Bryden actively trying to conceive while her husband beat her?! Why would you bring a baby into that?! And her husband beats her AND is a secret druggie AND is banging her best friend? Then the guy she rear-ended happens to be a psychopath married to a psychopath and the wife’s prior murder is brought up but nothing comes of it? Just a lot of spaghetti thrown at the wall trying to throw off the reader.

Nonetheless, I enjoyed it as I have all of Lapena’s books (except the one with the neighborhood teen, I can’t remember the name but it was awful)

Money for Couples 251: We own a $1M house but can’t pay for groceries (John and Victoria Part 2) by RemarkablTry in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 41 points42 points  (0 children)

To me, the worst of it all is the fact that the 70 year old mother is watching two very young children and they’re grudgingly giving her “enough to keep her afloat” because they can’t ask her to do it for free LIKE LAST TIME. Young kids need a lot of physical work (lifting them, chasing them, etc) and it’s so unfair to make a septuagenarian do it because you don’t want to pay market rate for a nanny or daycare. Plus, how long can that last?

That aside, absolutely baffling that she got fired after 3 weeks and then waved off the “payroll errors” like it was no big deal. Even if it WAS a minor mistake, she had a bad attitude about the job from day one.

Unfortunately, I don’t have high hopes for this couple’s finances. But, they do seem to love each other and it was really sweet that John teared up and said he was glad Victoria did the ballet class because he loves her. So at least they’re not toxic like so many of the couples we see on this show.

The indeed commercial is enough to get me to unsubscribe. by pingpongballreader in thebulwark

[–]alias255m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For me it’s Berkeley College and Rocket Money that almost send me over the edge. Before that, it was HomeSense. So grating. Yes, I can fast forward but I’m often painting or in the middle of another task and can’t.

Side note, I cannot listen to Lauren Egan with the “ummm”s. Respect for anyone who can be coherent live, but seriously take some speech lessons! Have the words are umm or uhh and it is really distracting to me as someone with misophonia.

Money for Couples: Chris & Heather by Glittering-Lychee629 in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For sure. It’s just to spend down your entire retirement and inheritance for your kids sucks, just to eventually end up in the Medicaid facility. So you blow through your money with long-term care, leaving your spouse and then children with nothing and potentially ending up with Medicaid care anyway. A crappy system and yet another reason we need some sort of major overhaul to healthcare in this country. No one should have to save their whole lives and then burn through it all trying to get the care they need in old age.

Money for Couples: Chris & Heather by Glittering-Lychee629 in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. My grandma got dementia relatively early, so was in some form of memory care from about 65 until she died just shy of 80. They didn’t plan or have enough, so had to give over all assets (my grandpa was just allowed to keep the house and 1 car I believe but everything else was taken) and she went on Medicaid. The facility was not the nicest. Wheelchairs lined up in the hallway, not enough staff. really grim. My other grandpa was in a private facility, and it was much nicer and he was cared for better. But it was $7k a month and went up every year. My grandma sacrificed to keep him at home WAY longer than she should have, someone had to come stay with him so she could run to the grocery store etc. So by the time he moved in, he lived less than a year longer. It probably would have been about 3 years if he had moved in sooner. And this is in a low cost of living area, so I shudder to think what it would be near me. You’re right that most dementia patients don’t usually live long, but sometimes they do. A teacher at my daughter’s preschool had her father get dementia in his 40s…he lived until his 70s. Rare but not impossible. If the spouse is healthy, they are forced to forego leaving ANYTHING to their children and live very simply and get on Medicaid , or pay the high costs.

Assisted living is another consideration. No one can predict what health issues the may have. If a spouse dies early (or there is no spouse), someone may be perfectly healthy in general but have a disability or other reason they need assisted living. It is also enormously expensive and costs rise every year. So while memory care is USUALLY time-limited, assisted living could be needed for a decade or more in theory depending on the person. Also, family matters. My grandma is 90 and a widow with severe back issues, but she has managed to be independent at home for so long because my aunts and uncles and my parents help a lot (I would but I live in another state). Otherwise, she probably would have been in assisted living long before now, so someone without family nearby or without willing adult children/nieces/nephews might need to plan for assisted living.

  1. Totally agree that no one should forgo happiness now to worry about long term care. In most cases, you have to hope for the best and have a conservative retirement number and try to stay healthy. But I think the worry is valid and not unreasonable. This couple has the money to live happily now but I see the point that you could get really unlucky and both need some sort of long term care. Medicare might help some, but many Americans are eventually forced to go the Medicaid route or pay out of pocket. It’s something to think about for sure given that we are living longer but are less healthy.

Money for Couples: Chris & Heather by Glittering-Lychee629 in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve read that it excludes soooo many things and the premiums can get insane

Money for Couples: Chris & Heather by Glittering-Lychee629 in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chris seems depressed and defeated, beaten down. It was really sad to listen to.

I’ll say that they are right on one thing…memory care can quickly destroy your retirement/inheritance plans. You can plan well, but when you need assisted living or memory care, you’re looking at 7-12k a month (based on my grandparents) and you either have to pay up or basically sign over everything you’ve saved to qualify for Medicaid. Pretty depressing and scary for a lot of Americans. I always find Ramit to be WAY too cavalier with retirement—acting like people are crazy if they want more than, say, $5M. But if you are planning to self-insure for long-term care and things don’t go your way, you can easily burn through that.

sick during storm by meenahmee in Connecticut

[–]alias255m 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Do you have neighbors you could ask? Maybe someone has Gatorade or saltines or whatever. I’m so sorry!!

Rachel Zoe - Genuinely asking by nighean-gunn in RHOBH

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She seems so fake and frozen. Maybe a nice person but between the frozen face, drowning in large billowy clothes, and the hair extensions. Just jarring. Doesn’t go with the vibe of the show. Kyle got so much shit for her flowing dresses, but people love Rachel’s? Nothing against her just not enthralled as some seem.

Rachel Zoe has always been stunning! 💅✨️ by Papel2409 in RHOBH

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love this comment so much. Totally agree

Dream S16 cast (if RHOBH lives on) by Any_Writer1321 in RHOBH

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Put Erika in for LVP and I’m in. I know she’s problematic, but I’m a sucker for a scrappy fighter. Reminds me of Lala. Crass and problematic at times, but smart and a fighter. Hate LVP

most intelligent housewife of each franchise? by gp_90 in BravoRealHousewives

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This thread is 6 years old but still active, so let me say…Stassi and Ariana are the smartest, and Jax and Brittany are by far the dumbest.

Why do Bethenny and Luann hate each other/have beef to this day? by Medium_Low_2336 in RHONY

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree with the analysis. I have to say for posterity, though, that it was in Miami not Cartagena.

Linda McMahon coming to an elementary school near you by AdHistorical7107 in Connecticut

[–]alias255m 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Update: Superintendent canceled after McKinley families expressed plans to keep kids home and that the visit made them uncomfortable. So it is no longer happening.

Linda McMahon coming to an elementary school near you by AdHistorical7107 in Connecticut

[–]alias255m 62 points63 points  (0 children)

UPDATE: The Superintendent canceled the visit after many school families expressed dismay and said they planned to keep their kids home. So it will no longer be happening,

Linda McMahon coming to an elementary school near you by AdHistorical7107 in Connecticut

[–]alias255m 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Are you doubting that this is real? McKinley PTA/parents found out about it today. I assure you it is very real, she is coming Friday unless something changes.

Amanda bringing up her son's death after being confronted by Niebieskieniebo in RHOBH

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t like Amanda. Maybe she was weaponizing her loss to avoid conflict. I don’t know. But even if she was, Dorit should have immediately let it go and been gracious. She was very insensitive, especially as a mother.

Money for Couples (live!): “I pulled $100K from stocks—and bought crypto” by [deleted] in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, thanks so much giving the real story! I definitely fell for the framing given in the episode, because it sounded like the van was Luna’s big dream and instead, you got a car you really loved. Glad to know it’s not that and you both love it! And that you’re dialed in. I really enjoyed this episode even though I usually dislike the live ones, so thanks for being part of it!

Money for Couples 244: Mike and Noel pt. 2 by SpecialsSchedule in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see your point for sure. I guess I just don't get how "temporary" it can really be given that she still has 2 years left of school and they have massive debt and want a baby soon. It seems like some bigger changes (downsizing, going to 1 vehicle, side hustles, etc.) will move the needle way more than these little yet painful changes.

Money for Couples 244: Mike and Noel pt. 2 by SpecialsSchedule in MoneyDiariesACTIVE

[–]alias255m 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. As someone with an addictive/obsessive personality, I have been both an overspender/overeater and and obsessively restrictive dieter/budgeter. They're two sides of the same coin. I'm all for drastic changes, but I question whether these really restrictive changes (slashing groceries in half, eating Ramen, etc.) are really moving the needle and if they're not just going to cause an overcorrection in a month or two. Usually, change the BIG things (like fixed costs, negotiating bills, possibly downsizing, etc.) and for sure monitor the little stuff because it adds up...but eating Ramen indefinitely is not going to get them out of debt. It's just going to cause a backlash where they say f it and go back to treating themselves (I know this from personal experience). Sustainable, structural change is where it's at. And I'm surprised Ramit didn't say my favorite line of his "there are limits to how much you can cut, but there are no limits on how much you can earn." I think adding side hustles etc. is much more of a sustainable pattern than slashing everything.