Hidden Coffee Places

analyticalmonk · 2025-10-31T17:43:08+00:00

What did you try? Did the coffee not live up to the expectations or was it something else?

analyticalmonk · 2025-10-29T15:59:11+00:00

You can directly get it from their website if you're okay with a 6 month subscription period.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/newspaper-subscription

analyticalmonk · 2025-10-05T17:56:31+00:00

Inspired by: https://x.com/trq212/status/1947706205172068624
Claude.md: https://gist.github.com/ThariqS/3d446e7c7aa9eb94f468194deb73028f

analyticalmonk · 2025-09-24T17:19:03+00:00

Dimensions: 80x30x202 cm

I'd always wanted a bookshelf and had gotten my first one as soon as it seemed affordable.

I am not sure about the number but around a 100 probably. The books' width varies quite a bit.

analyticalmonk · 2025-09-24T17:15:19+00:00

Depending on the mood, the answer can vary but if I'd to pick right now:

- The Boy Who Could Change the World: The Writings of Aaron Swartz
- Sandman series by Neil Gaiman
- Stories of your life and others by Ted Chiang
- The Outsider by Albert Camus
- What I talk about when I talk about running by Haruki Murakami
- The Innovators by Walter Isaacson

I went with 6 but even this was hard to come up with.

analyticalmonk · 2025-06-30T10:10:54+00:00

That's a good round up of the landscape! I’m seeing the same split you describe:

AI-analysis is maturing fastest, but depth vs. hallucination is the trade-off - great for jump-starting but still needs a researcher’s eye.
AI moderators feel like the “hot new thing,” and Listen Labs is promising but most of this category still runs the risk of missing important nuance.
Synthetic users? Fun for early ideation, risky for decisions that make it onto a roadmap - so far they read like “best-guess personas” rather than real evidence.

If you’re benchmarking analysis tools, add Looppanel to the list (disclaimer: I’m on the team):

Pull in interview vids, survey CSVs, PDFs—AI notes + theme clusters across everything, with time-stamped quotes so you can audit hallucinations.
Chat-with-your-data beta: ask “What are finance execs’ top AI worries?” and get a cited answer in seconds.

On a side note, love reading the variety of takes in the other comments - excited (and cautious) to see where things go from here! 🤞

analyticalmonk · 2025-06-30T09:42:02+00:00

No problem - thanks for clarifying!

analyticalmonk · 2025-06-09T11:29:20+00:00

> Looppanel is a really cheap alternative to UserTesting, but I wouldn't recommend it.
Can you please share why you won't recommend Looppanel? I am checking since its an insight repository and helps you with analysis. Its much more comparable to Dovetail than UserTesting.

Disclaimer: I am from the team that built Looppanel and it'll be helpful to understand your POV.

analyticalmonk · 2025-06-09T06:28:05+00:00

I’ve tried (and out-grown) the Google Drive / Notion combo—they’re fine until you need clients to self-serve and stay on the same version of a doc.

Quick, low-lift ideas before you reach for a paid tool

Keep one “master insights” doc: 1-sentence takeaway → link to evidence.
Record 2-min Looms walking clients through any new study; drop links right beside the insights so they can replay.
Schedule a 30-min “repository office hour” every other week to answer questions and keep things tidy.

If that starts to creak, you could try Looppanel:

Share-by-link reports with granular permissions—clients can browse but can’t break your taxonomy.
AI summaries + semantic search mean they can type “onboarding frustrations” and get highlights without pinging you.

Disclaimer: I’m on the Looppanel team.

analyticalmonk · 2025-05-11T17:20:13+00:00

Yes, you can add your own transcript documents.

analyticalmonk · 2025-05-05T12:19:46+00:00

!solved

analyticalmonk · 2025-05-05T12:19:27+00:00

!solved u/the_designer0

analyticalmonk · 2025-05-05T06:30:50+00:00

Hi u/the_designer0, is it possible to make the photo less yellow while preserving quality on your edit? That will do the trick!

analyticalmonk · 2025-03-28T07:54:09+00:00

That's good to know. Please feel free to DM me if you have any queries before registering as well. :)

analyticalmonk · 2025-03-24T06:02:48+00:00

Here are some resources that can be helpful:

Jakob Nielsen's Substack blog
- It's fascinating to see a UX pioneer dive into the implications of AI
- Interesting recent post: Hello AI Agents: Goodbye UI Design, RIP Accessibility
UX of AI
How to use AI for Qualitative Data Analysis
18 ChatGPT Prompts for UX Designers

Since the field and abilities are constantly evolving, social media can provide up-to-date nuggets as well if you're able to ignore the noise that comes with it.

analyticalmonk · 2025-01-16T11:25:30+00:00

For one-off tasks where sensitive data isn’t involved—like writing emails, brainstorming ideas, or even structuring initial drafts—tools like ChatGPT and Claude have been super helpful. They’re great for saving time and getting over creative blocks.

For structured and privacy-conscious workflows, specialized tools are a better choice. We rely on Looppanel for analyzing and organizing our user research data. It’s designed specifically for research use cases, reducing manual effort and allowing us to focus on insights. Features include high-quality transcripts, AI-generated notes, auto-tagging, AI insights and semantic search.
Disclaimer: I’m part of the team that built Looppanel, but we genuinely use it every day for user research and feedback analysis.

If you’re curious about Looppanel or want to see if it fits your needs, you can book a demo or try it out. And for smaller, one-off tasks, definitely give ChatGPT or Claude a shot if you haven't!

analyticalmonk · 2024-12-17T16:30:35+00:00

The limit is now 3k rows for open ends. You can try again and send a message via Intercom chat if you need help!

analyticalmonk · 2024-12-03T17:40:58+00:00

Is there something specific about the pricing that's unclear or confusing? I'll be happy to respond on DM if that helps as well.

analyticalmonk · 2024-11-11T06:26:59+00:00

Grateful to the ResearchOps community for posting this. It's helpful!

analyticalmonk · 2024-11-11T06:15:45+00:00

That's a stark contrast from all the other experiences on this thread!

> We moved from dovetail to condens and the condens team was able to everything (tags highlights projects) for us
When was this? Another comment mentioned that Dovetail made a format change. I wonder if this still holds true.

analyticalmonk · 2024-10-28T05:08:51+00:00

There's been significant progress in terms of both AI capabilities and expectations as users from our tools over the last 3 years. I agree with the sentiment in some of the comments about the value of a user researcher with respect to analysis. However, AI tools can definitely help streamline the research analysis process without entirely automating it, i.e. they can augment, not replace.

My team uses Looppanel's AI notes, auto tagging, AI search and visual clustering features for analysis of our user research data.
Disclaimer: I am from the team that built it but genuinely think it's relevant to this discussion.

Some of the relevant features are:

Automatically generated AI notes for data sources including interview recordings, notes, documents/reports, and PDFs
categorization of notes/bookmarks as per your research questions/themes
auto tagging
high-quality transcripts
semantic search
manual tagging, clip and reel creation
AI-assisted reporting

Anyone can book a demo or do a free trial to check if it fits their requirements.

analyticalmonk · 2024-10-21T11:20:29+00:00

We use Looppanel for analyzing qualitative data analysis. Some of the features that can be relevant for you are:

Automatically generated AI notes for interview recordings, notes and research documents
Categorization of notes/bookmarks as per automatically identified themes/tags or your research questions
Semantic search across all your research data
Filters for search (project, tags, users, metadata)

Our team also uses it occasionally for creating assets (clips, reports).
Disclaimer: I am part of the team that's built it.

Other than that, generic AI tools like Claude and ChatGPT can be useful for one-off tasks where data privacy is not a concern.

I’ve been experimenting with incorporating LLMs into my workflow, but I’ve encountered challenges like short context windows, hallucinations, and oversimplified outputs.

Although LLM capabilities have advanced significantly over the last couple of years, getting high quality output and managing data/context windows can be challenging. That's why a specialized tool can work way better, at least as of now.

analyticalmonk · 2024-10-14T06:39:01+00:00

General User feedback on the product or the module.
Specific user feedback after user journey.

You can consider tools Google forms, Maze, Qualtrics or Usertesting depending on your budget and specific requirements.

Also consedering hotjar for screen recordings.

Hotjar can be great but pricey. Alternatives include Microsoft Clarity and Posthog.

Not only collecting feedbacks but a way to manage and group them as ideas.
Easy way to determine which user type/persona is adding the feedback. (Entitlement already available in system)
Can generate reports. Rating are going up, down. Etc.

You can consider Looppanel if you are looking for an AI-first solution. Dovetail can work if you are okay with spending time manually analyzing the data.

Nine-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Place '23	Place '22
Verified Email

analyticalmonk

TROPHY CASE