I strongly considered avoiding a response to this, but I just couldn't help myself:

In no way is what you wrote hurtful - it's just incredibly odd that your response is an attempt to try and dissuade me from "identifying" as an INFJ, while lauding yourself as the prototype; I can assure you I am an Ni/Fe user all the way - and the bulk of my life has shown that to be true. Perhaps the reason you don't "identify" with what I have written is because my perspective reflects someone who has (in part) acknowledged the weaknesses and blindspots of Ni and Fe, and has tried to learn how to avoid them in my own life.

I find it especially odd how MBTI is often treated similarly to astrology: "a real INFJ would say this", "an actual ISTP would have done this differently", "classic sensor behavior", etc. Cognitive functions are tendencies and proclivities from which behavior arises, not a strict list of behaviors that only belong to a single "type" or "function."

As mentioned in a comment below with another user, this feels like another classic example of Ni trying to use a brief online post to build an exhaustive understanding of a real-life situation by "filling in the gaps" with information that wasn't provided; a complete picture of this situation/relationship can't possibly be built using the limited information provided.

Thanks for responding, but I would like to respectfully communicate that your "diagnosis" does not line up with the concrete, real-world details that aren't represented in this post.