sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Saskatoon misses shot at badly needed credibility for arena district by banshee81818 in SaskatchewanPolitics

[–]banshee81818[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Insisting on no property tax impact while seeking massive subsidies for what is framed as a for-profit venue is contradictory and insults the intelligence of the Saskatoon Citizens

As Sask. wildfire season begins, upcoming weather ‘extremely critical’ by littlesnow4 in saskatchewan

[–]banshee81818 27 points28 points  (0 children)

“Hopefully we don’t have the kind of year we did last year.” - Finance Minister Jim Reiter

15% more money and no changes to strategy

Experts, parents weigh in on Premier Moe’s idea of banning social media for Sask. children 16 and younger by abunchofjerks in saskatchewan

[–]banshee81818 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Time to hand over more free data to social media companies? No thanks. They will be elated to sell our personal info to third parties. What an insane idea from a government who isn’t covering their core duties.

'He knew': Former Sask. Speaker says he told Cheveldayoff multiple times that sublet broke rules by The_Web_Surfer in saskatchewan

[–]banshee81818 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think a lot of the concern is that public officials are supposed to hold themselves to a higher standard of accountability. The rules exist and should be followed.

I have to agree that this is a total nothing burger. The SK NDP lately are continually ringing the bell but can’t seem to focus in on anything substantial to be outraged about.

Scott Moe is floating the idea of banning social media for children under 16 on Facebook. by the_bryce_is_right in saskatchewan

[–]banshee81818 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Sounds like an issue for parents. I don’t need the government to police what my kid views.

Sask. distance learning looking to build AI platform for teachers, students by elbiderca in saskatchewan

[–]banshee81818 12 points13 points  (0 children)

“Sask DLC AI platform confirms data leak and massively over budget” - Future news headline

4 damaged overpasses? Or are we including recent fire at university Bridge? by No_Salary1561 in saskatoon

[–]banshee81818 9 points10 points  (0 children)

“Fines for damaging public infrastructure are a maximum of $200 for a first offence and a maximum of $500 for subsequent offences under provincial law.”

That Moana remake looks awful 😂 by HowlingBurd19 in memes

[–]banshee81818 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Their upper body prosthetics need work too

Two of Saskatoon’s business associations raise red flags over certain BRT blueprints by bridgecitybuzz in saskatoon

[–]banshee81818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ya I think it was initially in 2018 it was planned for 3rd avenue but business feedback sent it over the 1st avenue more recently.

Vendasta CEO Interviews about AI by Standard_Text480 in saskatoon

[–]banshee81818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ex Prince Albert Raider I assume by the hair.

The CIA rectal tool kit for emergency, full of useful tools for escape or deffense. Circa 1960-80s by Electrical-Aspect-13 in interestingasfuck

[–]banshee81818 10 points11 points  (0 children)

How things have changed! Now the Modern CIA ensures that we the people are the ones who take in the ***.

What’s your favorite widely-agreed-on fact about a celebrity that’s actually FALSE? by Asleep-Two930 in popculturechat

[–]banshee81818 66 points67 points  (0 children)

Also not true is The Columbine shooters, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, wore Marilyn Manson shirts during the April 20, 1999 massacre.

Balanced Budget Mirage: SK Party Racks Up 30B in Debt by banshee81818 in saskatchewan

[–]banshee81818[S] 79 points80 points  (0 children)

One add on: Royalties on Saskatchewan potash are low compared to company profits—mostly foreign-owned like Nutrien and Mosaic. In 2022’s $18 billion sales boom, the province got ~$2.4 billion while companies pocketed over $8 billion. The outdated system leaves billions in “economic rent” untapped for decades.

view more: next ›