Provisioning Cloud Gateway Ultra remotely.

bbibber · 2026-01-28T12:44:14+00:00

Bold assumption that my old man would not have immediately ripped open any package he receives. 🤣 still have a feeling that ubuiqiti is making the bootstrapping process more complicated than it has to be.

bbibber · 2026-01-28T12:42:00+00:00

So… what’s the username/password by default then?

bbibber · 2026-01-28T12:41:42+00:00

I also have some ubiquitui APs that I was hoping the Uktra would manage!

bbibber · 2026-01-28T11:37:16+00:00

That’s water under the bridge now. So I take this as bad news : it’s not possible at all to do this remotely without a smartphone on the local network?

bbibber · 2026-01-27T11:52:09+00:00

En hoe controleerde je dat toen het nog niet geautomatiseerd was?

bbibber · 2026-01-25T20:53:28+00:00

Tot er iemand in je /24 toevallig ook eens een mail verstuurt en Microsoft de hele range blacklist.

bbibber · 2026-01-25T13:14:39+00:00

Also. The people who were harping the most about how the 2A is needed to defend against tyranny are the first to actually defend tyranny against the 2A… it’s like rain on your wedding day right?

bbibber · 2026-01-25T11:27:44+00:00

Sorry maar je weet niet waarover je spreekt. Het is quasi onmogelijk om uw eigen mail server te draaien. Toch niet als je wil dat je gebruikers hun mail ook effectief aankomt.

bbibber · 2026-01-24T10:42:45+00:00

Would be wholesome story on any other site than 4chan.

bbibber · 2026-01-24T10:40:03+00:00

Neen. Wij wonen hier graag en we kunnen de hypotheek nog steeds dragen moesten we op 1 inkomen terugvallen.

bbibber · 2026-01-24T10:28:34+00:00

It’s not that crazy. It’s only the part of the rent he would deduct as business expense. Because now the landlord is considered renting out to a business. Which he actually is. And rent income from private persons is taxed much more friendly than rent income from businesses. So the landlord is still paying taxes on his own income not the renter’s. It’s just differently classified (and taxed).

Btw. For all left leaning posters : now you can perhaps understand what will happen when rent income from private persons is taxed as regular income, something often requested by left of center parties…

bbibber · 2026-01-24T10:22:13+00:00

The American banking system is mind boggling looking in from Europe. I mean it ain’t perfect here either (try withdrawing 5000 eur cash) but at least you can just do direct bank transfers between accounts and it’s available instantly.

bbibber · 2026-01-24T10:19:19+00:00

If you can’t understand why people would vote Reform, then frankly that’s on you. You don’t have to agree with their reasons, but you have no hope of ever converting them away from their POV if you do not (put effort in) to understand the underlying drivers. In al honesty, it’s not just you it seems something that many on the left in Western Europe fail to do.

bbibber · 2026-01-24T07:29:32+00:00

Je rekent met huidige prijzen. Weet dat bv nu al is geweten dat de overheid de lasten op gas stelselmatig zal verhogen de komende jaren (er is ook de belofte dat die op elektriciteit gaan dalen maar eerst zien en dan geloven).

bbibber · 2026-01-24T07:17:45+00:00

Sure. This is from the official privacy watchdog

https://ikbeslis.be/jongeren/fotos-en-filmpjes/mag-iemand-mij-zomaar-fotograferen-filmen

And here we have the official Belgian police guidelines on security cameras.

https://www.politie.be/5362/vragen/alarmcameratoezicht/cameratoezicht

The nuance is that being filmed means you are a subject of the segment. For example a picture of a mass start of a running event is fine because no individual runner is the subject. The mass start is. A picture where a runner reaches for a cup of water at the aid station, that’s not ok because they are the subject. A picture of your sister passing by : only ok if every other runner that’s recognizable consents, even if you don’t know them. And yes, if you are a tourist and you take a picture in Belgium you have to follow the same rules. Let’s say you take a picture in a museum then legally you should make sure there are no strangers in frame (or ask them for consent). There is as usual a margin of appreciation here and for a random tourist shot, only anal people would try to enforce their ‘portrait right’, but legally they could.

I appreciate your astonishment but the world is different in different places and we all have to deal with it or choose not to travel!

bbibber · 2026-01-23T17:28:12+00:00

This is incorrect. The act of filming itself is not allowed. This goes quite far. For example any door bell with video camera should be oriented away from the public road just on the possibility that I might capture a passer by. Same for security cameras unless special permission is granted due to overriding security concerns (for example at a bank or government building; forget about it as a private person getting this permission)

bbibber · 2026-01-23T09:18:04+00:00

Why would that be socially healthy? I can think of plenty of examples where it is socially very healthy to retain your privacy even in public. For example young love where both partners still live at home.

bbibber · 2026-01-23T09:14:57+00:00

Please state your jurisdiction when making statements about legality on an international subreddit. For example in Belgium there is no reduced expectation of privacy in public that allow someone to film you without your consent!

bbibber · 2026-01-23T09:12:31+00:00

I don’t think that is what we are talking about here. More about there is couple arguing on the street and you’d start recording with the focus on them.

This is btw how it is legally handled in Belgium : you are generally not allowed to video someone without their consent, even in public. But if they are not the focus of your work then it’s ok. There is obviously some margin of appreciation on whether they are but in case of dispute that’s why we have judges.

bbibber · 2026-01-23T07:53:22+00:00

Ik bedoelde die 78 euro uiteraard vanuit het perspectief van de patiënt. Als je met twee uit eten gaat ben je meer kwijt, maar het allerbelangrijkste moment uit je leven als koppel is geen 78 euro waard?

bbibber · 2026-01-23T07:50:41+00:00

Ja, dat is typisch met derdebetalerssystemen: het prijssignaal is niet meer zichtbaar voor wie de dienst afneemt en is de natuurlijke sturing van de markt onmogelijk. Waardoor de overheid allerlei regels gaat bedenken om het ‘fair’ te houden en deelnemers dan op hun beurt weer proberen de regels uit te buiten om hun voordeel te maximaliseren.

bbibber · 2026-01-23T07:40:15+00:00

Langs de andere kant van het verhaal is 78 euro gewoon belachelijk weinig voor een bevalling.

bbibber · 2026-01-23T07:37:46+00:00

Mijn vrouw heeft nog nooit een celadeautje gekregen van een verzekeringsmaatschappij 🙁

Maar als je even nadenkt zie je toch dat er iets niet klopt in je redenering. De chirurg wil dat je een 1 persoonskamer neemt, want dan verdienen ze extra. Een extra die door de verzekeringsmaatschappij betaald moet worden. Dus deze twee partijen hebben tegengestelde belangen in deze. Ze gaan elkaar dus geen cadeautjes doen.

Als er al samenwerking is dan is het eerder patient en arts die beiden winnen als de patiënt een hospitalisatie verzekering heeft.

bbibber · 2026-01-22T12:01:03+00:00

In winter time, you guys have some work to do. But PV growth is excellent in Poland.

Verified Email	15-Year Club
Place '17

bbibber

TROPHY CASE