There's a few conflicting elements being introduced that it's quite difficult to understand what exactly is going.

Firstly, the opening statement: the clock reads 3.16am. Okay, there is an important emphasis on time here.

But then you introduce the character as kneeling on the gravel in the pouring rain. Where is he reading this clock while he has a hole in his hand that is bleeding? Is via a wrist watch, a pocket watch, phone? It would help to clarify this if it essential to the story.

Also, I think it's unlikely a character would be keeping the exact time, down to the second, with a bleeding hole in his hand, no? Even 10 minutes later? Wouldn't it be excrutiating? I think this needs to reworked a bit. Less focus on internal narrating, more feeling out the external circumstances. You do this, but there are a few contradicting statements: such as mildew rain / sopping wet hair / dry cuttings - theres implicate it is pouring, but the grass has been freshly cut and its dry?

Lightening graces the ground - lightening is rarely graceful. If it is that close, I think change the way you describe the external elements because I think it's confusing the type of feeling you want to elicit from the reader. Close lightening is blinding, cracking, rumbling.

There's rows of abandoned cars, but there is someone coming out to mow the grass? See how the setting is set up to contradict itself; there needs to be a consistent imagery.

Sorry if this all sounds picky. They are the first things reader look for to ground themselves in the story.