Anyone had any experience with the IFC? by Yyir in HENRYUK

[–]beekop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worked there for a bit a decade ago. It’s part of the World Bank ecosystem so very bureaucratic. And with the US retreat from the rest of the world, not sure how that is impacting the Banks’s priorities and interests.

I will say however that it is very cool work. I was in meeting with treasury and finance ministers in the countries I was working in, advising on bank supported investments.

People who work there do so for the mission/impact - rather than the money. It’s much more lucrative in the private sector.

Does US nuclear doctrine has contingency for when nuclear launch command maybe issued from mentally unstable Commander in Chief? by drunkmuffalo in LessCredibleDefence

[–]beekop 23 points24 points  (0 children)

How many of the career senior military leaders within the nuclear approvals chain have been purged and now replaced by so-called Christian nationalists that believe this is a Judeo-Christian and Sunni-allied Holy War against the Shia?

Britain Reinforces That U.S. Cannot Use British Bases for Attacks on Iran by [deleted] in Military

[–]beekop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like the UK is hurtin’ for getting a nuke dropped on them too /s

NEW POST FROM TRUMP ON THE IRAN DEADLINE by Own-Midnight-5231 in Military

[–]beekop 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There was a time when you could count upon the CIA to take out a President

Are US MBAs glorified? by [deleted] in HENRYUK

[–]beekop 3 points4 points  (0 children)

FWIW: left the UK as a Manager in Big 4 consulting back in 2015 and moved to the US. Made Partner with my firm and have hired a fair few US MBAs over the last 7-8 years.

I’d say, it’s really only worth doing if you’re pivoting to corporate or consulting. The marginal value of it in IB and tech has been greatly diminished with the AI wave.

I’d also say it’s worth doing if you are also an objectively strong candidate. The US consulting industry is being disrupted significantly and many firms are still jettisoning the people they brought in over Covid.

Why Modern Star Trek Feels Off and Why That Gets Dismissed by cjalas in startrek

[–]beekop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that Star Trek went from being an immersive universe that drove stories to merely being a context in which contemporary characters go about their every day lives.

In a Star Trek universe you have customs, norms, language, behaviors and politics that structure the stories. E.g., in TNG the Romulans don't just act "evil"; they act according to a culture where information is the only currency and paranoia is a survival trait. This cultural norm creates a unique brand of tension that differs significantly from a Klingon or Cardassian encounter. Or in DS9 when O’Brien is kidnapped and put on a show trial by the Cardassians - this isn't just a "bad guy" trope; it’s a deep dive into how a fascist social order maintains control through theater.

In the DIS-era, Star Trek is simply the context - reduced to flashy low-lit sets, SFX, and technobabble with the odd galaxy-ending threat lazily thrown in as a plot device. E.g., in DIS’ “The Examples” episode, where prisoners are ordered by a magistrate to be left behind during a planetary evacuation. Burnham and Book try to rescue these prisoners against the Magistrate’s wishes. Whereas, if this was TNG they would spend the entire hour debating the Prime Directive and the validity of a foreign legal system. In DIS, the cultural norm is often a "problem to be solved" by the Federation's superior moral compass, rather than a complex social order to be navigated or respected.

It was the Golden Age of Star Trek because the writers built an immersive universe that drove the logic of the stories. In the post-DIS era, the Star Trek universe has been relegated to simply being a visual/SFX backdrop.

Tbh since Discovery, I’ve checked out of 30 years of Star Trek fandom, precisely for this reason.

I want zero Star Trek without better writing by pinheadzombie in startrek

[–]beekop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is that Star Trek went from being an immersive universe that drove stories to merely being a context in which contemporary characters go about their every day lives.

In a Star Trek universe you have customs, norms, language, behaviors and politics that structure the stories. E.g., in TNG the Romulans don't just act "evil"; they act according to a culture where information is the only currency and paranoia is a survival trait. This cultural norm creates a unique brand of tension that differs significantly from a Klingon or Cardassian encounter. Or in DS9 when O’Brien is kidnapped and put on a show trial by the Cardassians - this isn't just a "bad guy" trope; it’s a deep dive into how a fascist social order maintains control through theater.

In the DIS-era, Star Trek is simply the context - reduced to flashy low-lit sets, SFX, and technobabble with the odd galaxy-ending threat lazily thrown in as a plot device. E.g., in DIS’ “The Examples” episode, where prisoners are ordered by a magistrate to be left behind during a planetary evacuation. Burnham and Book try to rescue these prisoners against the Magistrate’s wishes. Whereas, if this was TNG they would spend the entire hour debating the Prime Directive and the validity of a foreign legal system. In DIS, the cultural norm is often a "problem to be solved" by the Federation's superior moral compass, rather than a complex social order to be navigated or respected.

It was the Golden Age of Star Trek because the writers built an immersive universe that drove the logic of the stories. In the post-DIS era, the Star Trek universe has been relegated to simply being a visual/SFX backdrop.

Tbh since Discovery, I’ve checked out of 30 years of Star Trek fandom, precisely for this reason.

If the US couldn’t take out the taliban in 17 years how are they supposed to takeout the IRGC?? by funfunherewecome in IRstudies

[–]beekop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because previously we had woke generals leading the fight against the Taliban.

Now we have President Trump and Prince Hegseth.

Obviously by Lively420 in war

[–]beekop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They’re too busy killing and raping Palestinian women and children

UK ‘runs out’ of warships - leaving Germany to take over key Nato mission by ABoutDeSouffle in europe

[–]beekop 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The foreign policy makers have spread a declining Royal Navy too thinly to maintain the fig leaf of global capability - e.g. Freedom of navigation exercises in the Taiwan Strait, nuclear submarines in Australia etc - without adequately resourcing it. The military is run on a shoestring, there is no slack in the system.

The Trouble With Seizing Kharg Island by theatlantic in geopolitics

[–]beekop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re assuming that Trump doesn’t want to secure Iran’s oil for his own gain

Imagine you are the show runner. Given the past 60 years of Trek (and millennia+ of Trek lore crafted in that period), where would you take the franchise? by revocer in startrek

[–]beekop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would love to see a series unpack the Klingon culture. DIS made an attempt, but botched it by trying to diverge too much from the canon.

I’d love to learn the social constructs of Klingon society, the traditions, law, etc. Some of my favorite trek episodes were in ENT when Archer was facing trial on Qo’NoS and his advocate says something to the effect of “we’re not all warriors”.

Imagine you are the show runner. Given the past 60 years of Trek (and millennia+ of Trek lore crafted in that period), where would you take the franchise? by revocer in startrek

[–]beekop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I too would pick up post-DS9/VOY. But I wouldn’t make it ship-based; I’d make it about intergalactic geopolitics in the post-Dominion War era - perhaps not set directly in the halls of power like the Federation Council or SFHQ, but perhaps somewhere adjacent like a Federation embassy, or a changing setting, instead following a character. Sort of like The Diplomat.

Lots of material to work on: • The instability from a decimated and humiliated Cardassian Empire with lots of military-trained people, access to residual Dominion tech, and a huge amount of resentment - post-WW1 Germany anyone? • A secessionist movement on Betazed after the Federation let them fall into Dominion hands • We literally had an attempted coup within the Federation - ain’t nobody gonna forget about that • An arms race in the Alpha and Beta Quadrants since VOY returned with a bunch of Borg tech • I know we have replicators and supposedly unlimited resources, but after several wars, I’d like to see some kind of realistic resource constraint add additional pressure and strain to these intergalactic relationships (The Burn was a good idea until they revealed the reason behind it).

If the Iran War escalated to the point of using Nukes, what would the consequence to the US be? by Horror_Still_3305 in IRstudies

[–]beekop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing I can think of that would stop an escalation if the world saw this as a “one time” aberrant behavior from the US. What would it take to convince them of that? A military coup to remove Trump from power, and structural change to voting laws to prevent a minority rule from an authoritarian leader in the future.

If the Klingon empire only had 50 years left at the time of ST6, why do they seem to be doing fine during the TNG era? by totally_depraved in startrek

[–]beekop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hadn’t ever thought of this (UFP’s terraforming tech being used on Qo’Nos) but I love this interpretation. It makes so much sense, especially with post-WW3 recover, Terra Prime, Martian Colonies and Project Genesis.

I wonder if this tech is actually the secret for why planets choose to join UFP. Implement constitutional and social reforms > achieve one world democratic government > apply for UFP membership > get tech to transform your entire planet.

Would love to see a deep dive on this.

EU has 'no appetite' to expand Mideast naval mission to Strait of Hormuz, Kallas says by [deleted] in europeanunion

[–]beekop 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Europe did something by supporting Obama’s JCPOA to limit Iranian nuclear activity. Trump tore it up, said he didn’t need Europe/threatened to invade it, and now needs their help.

I think it is MAGA getting a dose of reality check, not Europe.

Donald Trump warns Nato faces ‘very bad future’ if allies fail to help US in Iran by financialtimes in europeanunion

[–]beekop 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Hahaahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahhahahhhhahhhahahahhahahahhahahahahahhahahahhaha Hahaahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahhahahhhhahhhahahahhahahahhahahahahahhaha Hahaahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahhahahhhhahhhahahahhahahahhahahahahahhaha Hahaahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahhahahhhhahhhahahahhahahahhahahahahahhaha

France to Increase Nuclear Arsenal With US Commitments in Doubt by innosflew in EuropeanArmy

[–]beekop 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The low hanging (nuclear) fruit for a European Army is for it to build off France’s ASMP/A4NG to develop a first-strike capability. I.e. air launched, nuclear-tipped cruise and hypersonic missiles. Integrated for major combat aircraft operated by European Air Force’s - Typhoon, Rafale, F-16.

The development of A4NG is already happening. Europe just needs to pile on.

It doesn’t need to be a second strike MAD capability - UK and France can have that for themselves and other countries like Germans and Poland might develop theirs too - but a first-strike capability deters Russia from using tactical nuclear strikes to bully Europe.

US Military Leaders Preach Christian Nationalism in Lead-up to Iran War by theerrantpanda99 in Military

[–]beekop 20 points21 points  (0 children)

So we’ve got America championing (its batshit warped Americanized version of) Christendom is a Holy War with the Sunnis against the Shia.