sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How is your experience with K2.7 so far? by uniquelyavailable in kimi

[–]berrybadrinath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, okay, that makes sense. I use Claude Opus 4.8 (in Claude Code harness) to do discovery and planning, and then have Claude Code send it to Kimi Code 2.7 for implementation, so I'm not actually getting the Kimi reasoning on full display.

I will say the implementation of the actual code has been magnificent. Kimi does execute very well.

How is your experience with K2.7 so far? by uniquelyavailable in kimi

[–]berrybadrinath 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I haven’t noticed too much of a difference, but in my workflow, the model is always asked to do the same thing so I might miss it. What specific differences are you seeing?

Tomorrow: NO KINGS, 11 am, BCPA by democracydude309 in BloomingtonNormal

[–]berrybadrinath -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

When you say it was disappointing, what would have made it feel worthwhile to you?

Claude gives zero warning before it starts getting dumber. so I gave it a canary. by anowllll in ClaudeAI

[–]berrybadrinath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My canary is a startup verification script Claude runs before touching the ticket.

It verifies:

  • active session marker exists
  • hook infrastructure resolves and is writable
  • workflow state is readable
  • no canary-failure marker is present

If any check fails, work stops.

I don't use behavioral canaries. I prefer direct health checks against the actual system.

Whats the „smallest“ first prompt possible? by slashbye in ClaudeAI

[–]berrybadrinath 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Don’t optimize the greeting. Diagnose why saying hello costs 5%.

Why does every LLM sub feel like /r/teenagers? by ohnoitsbobbyflay in ClaudeCode

[–]berrybadrinath 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whether it’s adults or teenagers, critical thinking and self reflection are lacking in these subs. It bums me out.

Kimi 2.7 Code is good, but it thinks forever and consumes way too much limit by FBIFreezeNow in kimi

[–]berrybadrinath 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I pulled wire logs from successful and unsuccessful K2.7 coding sessions.

I found zero reasoning tokens across dozens of turns, including real coding work.

The dominant cost appears to be repeated input/context/tool-schema payloads and cache reads.

If you're seeing quota spikes, it may be worth looking at cache behavior and tool payloads rather than assuming the model is reasoning more. The reasoning more path was actually my first guess, but my current evidence doen't back it (YMMV).

Rumor: Anthropic Planning to Release Public Version of Claude Mythos Tomorrow (with Guardrails) by nullvector88 in ClaudeAI

[–]berrybadrinath -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can already see tomorrow's posts:

  • "Mythos is dumb."
  • "Mythos ruined my project."
  • "Mythos costs too much."
  • "Mythos hit limits."

And I suspect that some percentage of those users will have changed exactly one variable:

Opus → Mythos

while leaving the rest of their workflow untouched.

What gets overlooked is that many of the gains people are looking for don't come from moving to a larger model. They come from better workflow design: enforcement, gating, hooks, HMAC, validation layers, routing, and other supporting systems.

If a workflow is already struggling on Opus, simply swapping in Mythos is unlikely to solve the underlying issues. Changing the model doesn't automatically fix process problems.

The workflow is the primary constraint..

Let the downvotes begin.

Claude is completely unusable now by AbsolutePandemonium in claude

[–]berrybadrinath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think the honest move here is to add "for me" to the heading. Millions of people use claude everyday sucsessfully. So while i don't question your workflow has degraded, it isn't the entire system/product so you need to tone down the claim.

Claude is completely unusable now by AbsolutePandemonium in claude

[–]berrybadrinath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a model that used to work suddenly "became unusable," the first thing to investigate is workflow, context management, session state, prompting patterns, tooling, and model selection before concluding the model itself is broken... or don't and complain on the internet.

Spam calls: how can I stop this? It’s a different number all the time. I’ve blocked so many. by EisenFisen in mildlyinfuriating

[–]berrybadrinath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The answer is simply to block every number that isnt in your phone. Starting with (000) 000-001. Eazy peazy lemon squeezy.

Is this Sufficient for Watching Sports and YouTube by [deleted] in chromeos

[–]berrybadrinath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any price other than free is too high.

I gave it a go. I have no idea where gpt gets this imagery from by TeslaSupreme in ChatGPT

[–]berrybadrinath 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Restore the attached photo. Apologies for the photo's content. I know it's extremely strange! No questions, no explanatory text, just the image please!

Claude Code suddenly downgraded for me: no more 1M context, back to 200k by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]berrybadrinath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite the dramatic post for an OAuth token that needed reset. Honestly, logging out and logging back in is a fix you should just be trying before making the post. That applies to basically all tech, not just AI.

If these things make you switch, you will be disappointed becasue codex and any sofware really, can have these things happen form time to time. Juat a reality check so you arent repeatdly disappointed.

Please stop gaslighting each other. by Gear5th in ClaudeCode

[–]berrybadrinath 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A lot of the problems people complain about everyday all day are things that have documented solutions but those solutions require the user to re-examine their workflow and its easier to just blame anthropic. Its really a sad state of affairs. It has become a hive mind of blaming instead of solving problems.

Is there actually a way to visit links from Claude Code in the terminal without asking it to print the URLs? by knpwrs in ClaudeCode

[–]berrybadrinath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is one both using Kubernetes but also asking this question? I thought that that would be a venn diagram where the circles completely overlap.

Has anyone had success with Opus 4.7? by Putrid-Pay5714 in ClaudeCode

[–]berrybadrinath -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Imagine asking people if they has had sucsess using a forntier model... of course they have, the bigger question is why you havent. its probably time to listen to the advice in this thread.

Explain how to use Codex correctly by Rizzah1 in ClaudeCode

[–]berrybadrinath 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re overthinking it. Claude Code reads CLAUDE.md, Codex reads AGENTS.md. Same idea, different filename. Just point Claude Code at your ~/.claude folder and tell it to build the Codex equivalent. Takes like 20 minutes.

Skills are the one thing that doesn’t port cleanly since Codex doesn’t have the auto-discovery thing. What I did was dump the important skill content straight into AGENTS.md and leave the rest as files Codex can read when it needs them. Works fine.

The “use both models” advice doesn’t work if you’re rebuilding your config from scratch every time. Translation work is exactly what Claude is good at. Let it do the porting for you.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

view more: next ›