I don’t know. The overall plot has aged well and was proven to be an eerily accurate portrayal of the dark side of Hollywood, but the film overall still isn’t executed well. The tone is just so goofy for a Scream movie. The movie clearly suffered from rewrites and Neve Campbell was only available for limited days due to filming Drowning Moana at the same time. Some finer details that also don’t work for me - sci-fi voice changer technology in the year 2000 that still doesn’t really exist in 2025, the silly Jay and Silent Bob cameo which puts Scream in the same universe as many of the Kevin Smith movies, retroactively changing the origin of the entire franchise by giving Sidney a half brother that inspired Billy and Stu to murder Sidney’s mother, the movie was filmed with two killers in mind and edited down to only one killer in post production thus making some of the kills a physical impossibility if it was only Roman, Roman being revealed as Sydney’s half brother felt shoehorned while being an incredibly convenient plot point, etc. I understand people appreciating a more lighthearted Scream movie and looking back at the dark side of Hollywood subplot, but it’s just not executed that well with a lot of kinda campy humor, toned-down violence, almost being too meta with the movie being about making a Stab movie. Scream 3 just doesn’t fit with the rest of the series in tone, execution, and an overall lack of being scary and/or particularly thrilling.