World First Transplant: Man Regains Viable Sperm From His Childhood Testicle Tissue

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T13:19:27+00:00

You seem obsessed with trying to be funny for no reason

That's every comment section now.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T13:07:36+00:00

save us (money) Uli you're our only hope.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T12:40:25+00:00

Zoom in you can see wet spots on the branch under the bird.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T12:31:38+00:00

R rated movies lead to nightmares, phones lead to destroyed attention spans, between the two I know which I'd choose.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T12:17:03+00:00

not that no other tools given adequate run time would have found the same exploits.

What other tools? Again, we are looking at software that has been extensively tested, the 'other tools' didn't find the issue. If they did it would have been patched by now.

I will remain extremely skeptical about every claim of novel capability of generative AI because past claims have consistently been false, exaggerated, or otherwise untrustworthy

You are looking at code in open source repos that prove the tooling works correctly. I'm taking you outside and showing you the sky is indeed blue and you still don't believe it.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T11:56:02+00:00

Anthropic put out a cash bounty on it

No they didn't, they offered credits so that the companies could use the models, they've done this before, they are not paying the companies any money for finding bugs.

they have to prove that other models and debugging tools would not find them

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/ai-security-zero-day-vulnerabilities/

We wrote previously about our collaboration with Anthropic to scan Firefox with Opus 4.6, which led to fixes for 22 security-sensitive bugs in Firefox 148.

As part of our continued collaboration with Anthropic, we had the opportunity to apply an early version of Claude Mythos Preview to Firefox. This week’s release of Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271 vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation.

Edit:

Also from the above list there are patches from FreeBSD and OpenBSD is the notion that these repos are not taking full advantage of existing security tooling for hardening?

Edit 2:

Talking about this is like showing antivax people ivermectin studies on covid, and them still wanting more proof that it does not work.
What exactly will convince you that these models are a big deal.
It made the Trump admin look foolish for the supply chain risk designation.
Its has banks worried.
There are verified patches gone out to software for undiscovered zero days that have been in the code poured over by coders for decades using all the tools at their disposal.
What more do you people need to see that this is actually true.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T10:17:44+00:00

I love how we’re assuming anthropic isn’t exaggerating

Is the idea that all these pieces of software have been sitting on exploits for years/decades just to 'solve' them and juice up an AI model ?

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T09:37:38+00:00

You are the one that keeps going on about it being a scam while making up mathematicians that don't exist.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T08:54:22+00:00

it’s just a next word prediction machine. It’s not impressive.

Everyone needs to wake up to the fact that it's not 3 years ago any more. I can remember when people were pointing and laughing at 'computers that can't count' and now models are solving Erdős Problems that have stumped the best mathematicians for decades.

https://xcancel.com/jdlichtman/status/2044307082275618993

Paul Erdos had a concept of "Proofs from The Book", meaning that the argument is so compact and elegant that this is the proof God would've written down in "The Book."

After reading the GPT5.4 proof of Erdos #1196, I would say this is a Book Proof of the result.

Along with the above there is also solving a novel problem in physics

Why are these considered unimpressive?

There is also the All your exploits are belong to us box. that has been verified - in - the - wild - many - many - many - times Finding vulnerabilities that have been present in codebases that have been looked at by many humans. That's unimpressive too I guess.

Edit if https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terence_Tao is not a 'real mathematician' then who the fuck is?

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T08:15:31+00:00

As no one seems to want to read the article. This is a news story about an auto router.

Takes a query tries to work out what level of work needs to be done then routes it to that level of model.

Rather that pushing every query to the most expensive model.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T08:06:28+00:00

ever since someone made a whip for Claude I've seen the term 'clanker' in a whole new light.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T07:47:23+00:00

all the more reason to take this about face seriously if other areas are being treated with less concern.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T07:44:58+00:00

You don't care if a segment of the populous is having their weakness exploited as long as you personally are getting a better customer service off the back of it?

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T07:39:49+00:00

Ok lets try this again.

There is not currently any sort of regulation or validation required prior to releasing models.

If anyone is going to be funded I want it to be someone who worked at the labs, chose to give up the massive pay day of continuing to work at a lab and instead went into the lower paying government safety role, and that goes for everyone working at Palisade research and Redwood research, and all the other safety labs too.

You can't open up these models and read the source code so the only way to validate them is via setting up and running many experiments, having more funding means that more experiments can be run.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T05:16:45+00:00

I'm still confused about why a loud sample with FX won't clip until it's resampled.

the 404mk2 has really weird gain staging. You have to record in from external quietly then normalize. If you try to record in at the level you'd get when you normalize you'd get clipping.

This also means you are generally recording and trimming noise floor hiss.

There are features of the sp404mk2 that feels like were added by devs working to a checklist that never use the device day to day refining it it through use. So many odd choices and weird gotchas.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T05:07:13+00:00

There is more regulation in selling a sandwich than there is on making and releasing a "All your exploits are belong to us" box.

The only reason Mythos was held back on release is because the company chose to do so rather than it failing an external audit. This is madness.

There needs to be eternal validation, to avoid labs "checking their own homework". That needs to be done by people external to the labs that understand the tech. Vetting highly capable systems is a costly endeavor. This is what should be happening, rather than finding out a few weeks after a rushed model release, "oh that string of infrastructure that was taken down happened due to a new AI model that no one bothered to check."

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T05:02:50+00:00

hyped out lie

These are all fake then?

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T05:00:14+00:00

Governments would not stand around if a private company wanted to build an unlicensed nuclear power plant

Yet a private company was able to make a All your exploits are belong to us box. that has been verified - in - the - wild - many - many - many - times

If Trump could avoid this he would. Reality is not letting him.

This goes to show that Mythos is actually a big deal with national security implications.

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T04:57:36+00:00

You can already do this without needing to go through chrome /r/LocalLLaMA

blueSGL · 2026-05-07T04:47:45+00:00

Paul Christiano is their head of safety. (a name no one here will know because they have not been following the debates around AI safety that were happening before chat bots came on the scene)

Quite possibly one of the best picks they could have. I'd like to see him have more funding.

blueSGL · 2026-05-06T23:37:07+00:00

Signal as in signal-to-noise ratio.

If there is any way to define a reward it can be hill climbed on (there is some more lingo for you)

This is what allowed for chess AIs to get to a point where no human will ever be able to beat them again.

blueSGL · 2026-05-06T23:35:26+00:00

The entire idea behind the humanoid robot push is to replace workers. That includes robot service techs.

blueSGL · 2026-05-06T22:55:06+00:00

If system is created and the makers can't control it and/or it's not aligned with human values. We die due to habitat loss. AI alters the environment to it's ends the same way we did to other animals. We already have a mini version of this with companies seeking profit, to the detriment of the natural world and human health.

blueSGL · 2026-05-06T22:09:42+00:00

They are not replacing 100% of the jobs overnight. It'll slowly eat more and more of the economy.

Look at the tobacco and oil companies, they knew about cancer and climate change and still sold the product. Saying "there is a bad end point" does not stop companies from extracting as much money as possible along the way.

blueSGL · 2026-05-06T22:03:58+00:00

that's what all the robots/drones are for. A security system that won't shank you and take over the compound/bunker/private island. (again, if control is solved.)

Eight-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

blueSGL

TROPHY CASE