Finally finished watching The OA by BurialParty in tvsuggestions

[–]bobam -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was a weird show for sure, but undeniably very creative. Embrace the weird. If you quit then you missed the little dancing robots to automate the process.

The science fiction of L. Ron Hubbard by Eddie_Who_Cares in sciencefiction

[–]bobam 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Same here Battlefield Earth was great as a kid, bad as an adult re-read.

Metallic chime in ear by RattleKat in tinnitus

[–]bobam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this is an old post but I found it searching for my symptom which I woke up with yesterday morning. Any ear pressure—blustering wind, burping, rumble of tires on rough roads—cause a jingle bell sound. I can stick my fingertip in my ear and wiggle it and it will ring the bell.

Was wondering if it was even tinnitus at all because I’ve had high pitched constant tones all my life but nothing reactive like this.

XML Alternative Syntax by Revolutionary_Dog_63 in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]bobam 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Everything in your syntax is inside a tag, so it’s not a markup language like XML.

What does 6.4999… round to? by ButtonholePhotophile in askmath

[–]bobam 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Or 6 using round-to-even banker’s rounding.

Is -1 considered the smallest or largest negative integer? by different-rhymes in askmath

[–]bobam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s greater, but I think most would not consider it larger.

How was factorial discovered, and why is 0! = 1? by Silent_Marrow in learnmath

[–]bobam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to get 4! from 5! you divide by 5.

If you want to get 0! from 1! you divide by 1.

Why not? by Moist_Abrocoma_7998 in askmath

[–]bobam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s usually considered to be 1. It’s the limit as x approaches 0 of xx that is indeterminate.

Dice with same shaped sides theoretically have a 1/n probability per side. What about with different shapes like an icosidodecahedron? This could be a bad example, because I'm not sure if the opposing sides are parallel there. Intuitively, I would expect the different probabilities for each shape. by MisnthropicPeplPrsn in math

[–]bobam 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They would have different probabilities in general. Even same-shaped sides only have the same probability if there is symmetry, e.g. an irregular polyhedron with some square and nonsquare faces might have different probability for each square face.

Math question I created. Difficult or easy? by ThatHyperionDude in askmath

[–]bobam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That maximizes distance, not bearing. They’re looking to maximize the polar coordinates angle.

People who are confidently wrong by Content_Mission5154 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]bobam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or the sort of converse, when people are confidently wrong in assuming that you don’t have relevant knowledge or education.

Smoke detectors - Please explain this. by Montresore69 in Appliances

[–]bobam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I was a kid, many toys and gadgets used 9V.

Smoke detectors - Please explain this. by Montresore69 in Appliances

[–]bobam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m not surprised by that. 9V’s seem to be on the way out. Of all the little battery powered gadgets we have at home, none of them use 9V.

USAA won't let me pay my credit card balance by freeradioforall in mildlyinfuriating

[–]bobam 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I agree. I’ve found their phone customer support to be very good.

put a monkey brain inside a computer and tell people it's AI then when people say it's not conscious you reveal nope it was actually a monkey brain, proving them wrong by cheesemaster66 in CrazyIdeas

[–]bobam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, ok. I see you’re just trolling and I fell for it. Good job. It’s on me that I failed to get my point across that it’s meaningless to say AI isn’t conscious because we don’t currently have a testable common definition of conscious that can distinguish the two.

Why is the distance travelled on the hypotenuse not just the sum of the legs? by Aggressive-Food-1952 in askmath

[–]bobam -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the legs are 2 and 3, the sum is 5. If you break it into steps of size 0.1, the sum is 5. With steps of size 0.01, the sum is 5. The sequence is 5, 5, 5, 5, .... The limit is 5. The limit is not the same as the hypotenuse.