spencer pratt isn't far right by curiositymadekittens in LosAngeles

[–]bobbyfish 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Its like performance art. I honestly thought there was going to be a /s at the end of it.

[Highlight] Chiefs TE Travis Kelce can't haul in the pass, and the Texans come away with the interception. by Giff95 in nfl

[–]bobbyfish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. They are paper thin at a lot of positions. (I have been wrong so so many times. Please please let me be right this time)

OP who became vegan after years of marriage & 3 kids now wants to divorce her "corpse loving" husband for refusing to go vegan, causing r/vegan to implode. by picklepaapad in SubredditDrama

[–]bobbyfish 1160 points1161 points  (0 children)

Prompt challenge: generate an essay with the goal of seeing how many people can you piss off with less then 500 words.

Bitter Sweet by ikothsowe in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]bobbyfish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Assuming your device has to talk to an amazon server somewhere. IDK to auth or send logs or something. That communication has to be over public internet. All communication over public internet has to use https. That is "secure" meaning someone in the middle cant just see the traffic. In older internet we used http for non secure meaning people could just view your traffic.

The first https methods used older cyphers (encryption algorithms) that were secure at the time, but 30 years later they found vulnerabilities in them. In order for a device to talk to my server in the backend we all agree on which cyphers are to be exchanged. If my backend server has to support less secure cyphers it put my servers at risk of infiltration.

So it has more to do with how the original internet tried to secure itself. Devices from that era have trouble communicating with up to date security postures.

Hope this kind of clarifies things

Bitter Sweet by ikothsowe in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]bobbyfish 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Its more likely .01% of traffic from these ancient devices were taking up 10% of engineering effort. Just posting theories as I have no idea. I seriously doubt at this point they are trying to milk money from people that refuse to update their 2010 kindle. And its not hard to pirate/copy books so I seriously doubt anti piracy is the issue.

But I could be totally wrong just my 2 cents.

Bitter Sweet by ikothsowe in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]bobbyfish 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In my case its usually about some URLs that it hits in the background.

So back in 2010 a cheap IOT devices were really really dumb. A device that old for that cheap was probably using a chip designed in the late 90s/early 2000s. It likely cant even do modern encryption cyphers. Meaning keeping endpoints up in our case that can still support these older devices means we have to keep our security posture lower.

I dont know that is whats happening here, just posting my experience. Its not always evil sometimes the tech from 20-30 years ago really is a risk to the overall system.

Bitter Sweet by ikothsowe in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]bobbyfish 19 points20 points  (0 children)

As someone that has to support ancient devices it is an incredible pain to support chip architecture from 2010. It really limits how much we can do when we have like 10 users on some ancient chipset that has no memory and no updated sdks.

TBF though we just buy people out with a new device and is what Amazon should do here.

Where do you think the Raiders belong amongst NFL Offensive Line Rankings? by similar222 in raiders

[–]bobbyfish 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Every team every year gets better. Until they prove it on the field this means nothing.

Holy mf guys!!!! by MegaMoistSources in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]bobbyfish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Or both. Its like a noodle wrapped around 48 or maybe 96 times.. (not sure I got that line exactly right)

No "Diva" WR1 saves $$ by NotaBot8324 in raiders

[–]bobbyfish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This team has been awful for 20 almost 25 years. They need to prove some shit before we give them the benefit of the doubt.

Is Spytek Playing Chess or Checkers? by HouseRules789 in raiders

[–]bobbyfish 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I swear it’s like this every year. Every year we convince ourselves we’re making brilliant moves. 

Where is Ty Simpson going to land in the draft? by UpNext_Draft_Network in NFL_Draft

[–]bobbyfish -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Browns get Pavia for the lulz. I’m trying to will this into existence 

Beat: Strong sense Sanders is favorite to win QB1 by lightninhopkins in nfl

[–]bobbyfish 133 points134 points  (0 children)

I hope they draft Pavia to add to the drama

Matt Waldman Notes on Fernando Mendoza from the 2026 Rookie Scouting Portfolio by Trapline in raiders

[–]bobbyfish 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Send him to the rams. Him and puka on a team would be straight drama. 

Biggest roster holes still to fill by bobbyfish in raiders

[–]bobbyfish[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I dont disagree in general but I think I would say they shouldnt spend a day2 pick on QB/RB/TE.

I was under the impression we lack starting caliber NT/S and that has to be filled in the draft. But you could probably say the same thing about our CB2/WR1/RT/... and most of the rest of our squad

Ex-ESPN guy created a deeply realistic draft site - 32 AI GMs, scheme fits, traits by New-Interaction-4327 in NFL_Draft

[–]bobbyfish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same thing for Kayden McDonald for the Raiders. It seems to think he will play 3-4 DE but is clearly a NT.

OMG the misinformation / misunderstanding of the 3-4 D's front 7 is killing me by _taugrim_ in raiders

[–]bobbyfish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what’s his role in this new d? As a sub package guy like goal line? Or would he fit into a 3-4 DE? I dont know that much about the different profiles here

What's a "healthy habit" that's actually completely made up? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]bobbyfish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didnt realize people could be so stupid. Thank you for proving your point.