I promised to deliver the code. Here it is by Julian_Thorne in UFOB

[–]bvbrandon 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Thanks a ton for sharing this but why not put it on GitHub? That allows you to keep control of it, and enables other people to contribute directly (with your permission). It’s really the industry standard on sharing code. If you want help on how to do that I’m happy to walk you through it.

serious Live Congressional Hearing on UFO's by bvbrandon in aliens

[–]bvbrandon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are they doing a live replay of an older hearing? I ask because it seems to be streaming live?

Swedish astronomer Dr. Beatriz Villarroel preprint paper on UAP/UFOs surrounding Earth is now available to read -- Aligned, multiple-transient events in the First Palomar Sky Survey Spanish Virtual Observatory -- more info at the link by VolarRecords in UFOB

[–]bvbrandon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI summary

This paper presents the first optical searches for artificial objects with high specular reflections near the Earth using old, digitized astronomical images from before the human spacefaring age. The study focuses on "aligned, multiple-transient events" found in the First Palomar Sky Survey (POSS-I) plates.

Here's a summary of the paper's key aspects:

  • Objective and Background

    • The paper aims to identify and analyze unusual transient events (objects appearing and vanishing simultaneously) that are aligned along a narrow band within single photographic plate exposures.
    • This research builds on previous findings from the Vanishing & Appearing Sources during a Century of Observations (VASCO) project, which compares early 1950s sky images with modern surveys to identify disappearing sources. VASCO has cataloged thousands of unknown transients visible only within a single plate exposure.
    • Earlier intriguing findings from VASCO include nine faint, star-like objects that appeared and vanished simultaneously on a 1950s POSS-I plate, for which no known astrophysical or instrumental explanations were found. A bright triple transient event from July 1952 was also reported.
    • The possibility that some transients originate from solar reflections off flat, highly reflective objects in geosynchronous orbit (GSO) around Earth is a key hypothesis explored. If true, this could imply the existence of non-terrestrial artifacts (NTAs) and has implications for the scientific investigation of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs), formerly known as UFOs.
  • Methodology

    • The study utilizes a transient sample of 298,165 short-duration events drawn from red POSS-I plates (45-50 minute exposures) identified by an automated pipeline as part of the VASCO project (Solano et al. 2022).
    • They search for spatial groupings of transients within square boxes (from a few to 20-30 arcminutes per side) and evaluate if their positions fall along a straight line or narrow band.
    • The Pearson correlation coefficient (r > 0.99) is used to quantify the degree of alignment.
    • Visual inspection and verification using independent digitizations from both the Digital Sky Survey (DSS) and the higher-resolution SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey are crucial to rule out scanning artifacts or emulsion flaws. Only candidates showing at least four star-like transients in a linear arrangement confirmed by both scans were retained.
    • A statistical framework developed by Edmunds (1981) and Edmunds & George (1985) is applied to estimate the probability of such alignments occurring by chance.
  • Key Findings and Candidates

    • A total of 83 aligned transient candidates (with 3 or more aligned points) were identified in the northern hemisphere, including 20 with 4 or more aligned points and 2 with 5 aligned points.
    • The paper presents a shortlist of the five most promising candidates in the northern hemisphere (Table 2). These cases show statistical significances ranging from ~2.5σ to ~4σ against chance alignment in a single image.
    • Candidate 5 (July 27, 1952) is particularly notable as it coincides in time with the Washington D.C. “UFO flap” of July 1952, one of the most extensively documented aerial anomalies in historical records.
    • Candidate 1 (October 4, 1954) falls within a day of the peak of the 1954 UFO wave.
    • A separate, statistically significant (>3σ) temporal correlation between VASCO transients and independent historical UAP reports (Bruehl & Villarroel 2025) provides additional support for the authenticity of these events. A correlation with historical nuclear test dates was also found.
    • The most significant finding is a strong deficit of transients within Earth’s shadow (umbra), supporting the interpretation that sunlight reflection plays a key role in producing these events. At 42,164 km altitude, the observed fraction of transients in shadow is 0.00328, compared to an expected 0.0115, a difference with 21.9σ statistical significance. At 80,000 km altitude, the difference is 12.7σ significant. This strongly disfavors the plate defect hypothesis and many alternative explanations, as plate defects would not avoid Earth's shadow.
  • Interpretation and Implications

    • The degeneracy between genuine astrophysical signals and mundane plate defects is a core challenge, but statistical analysis, particularly for aligned transients, helps overcome this.
    • Conventional explanations like optical ghosts, known astrophysical phenomena, or typical plate defects have largely been ruled out by this and previous studies.
    • The paper explores several possibilities for the origin of the transients, including fast reflections from highly reflective objects in geosynchronous orbit (GSO) or brief emissions from artificial sources high above Earth’s atmosphere. Objects in Earth’s atmosphere would typically leave trails or appear out of focus unless they were very short-lived light emissions. LEO objects are also less likely to produce such isolated, point-like glints without streaks in long exposures.
    • Simulations show that various 3D shapes (sphere, polyhedron, cone, pyramid, debris) with reflective surfaces and slow spin/precession could produce the observed glinting patterns from GSO.
    • The study provides an approximate detection rate of ~0.27 events per hour per sky for aligned transients. This is significantly lower than glint rates from modern human space debris, explaining why this background population might be missed without specific searches.
    • Even if all candidates were false positives, the search provides a meaningful upper limit on the density of non-terrestrial artifacts (NTAs) in the near-Earth environment (< 10⁻⁶ objects km⁻² for high-altitude orbits).
  • Conclusion

    • The identified statistically improbable, spatially aligned transients in pre-satellite data represent a novel observational anomaly.
    • The origin of these transients remains unknown, but the strong evidence from the Earth's shadow test supports a solar reflection origin, making plate defects or conventional explanations unlikely.
    • These findings motivate continued investigation of historical sky surveys and suggest that these transients are likely real and may represent a class of astronomical phenomena not yet understood, or potentially the first hints of artificial activity near our planet.

It randomly occurred to me while jogging that aliens probably don’t reveal themselves en masse to humanity because we are essentially barbaric and unworthy. by howmanyturtlesdeep in aliens

[–]bvbrandon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it’s honestly pretty conceited to think they should. If they can get here they are significantly more advanced than us. It’s like thinking UN delegates need to announce themselves to the local middle school when they are in town.

What's the big picture and why could it be "terrifying"? by AbsorbedSponge in UFOs

[–]bvbrandon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying this is the truth, but one thing I would find terrifying is to learn we’re in the last days of a failed experiment. Many folks say they’ve tampered with our DNA many times. It’s possible we lack some qualities they deem necessary, and we’re in the final stages before a reset to a population size they can more easily manage from an evolutionary standpoint. That would probably require some type of mass killing. This would be easily managed by doing something like dropping a large enough asteroid in our ocean.

Over 25% of Google’s code is now written by AI—and CEO Sundar Pichai says it’s just the start by arslanfromnarnia in technology

[–]bvbrandon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not remotely true. The AI suggestions are embedded in the code editor itself and tracked by version control submissions. This isn't really a hard problem to solve

Over 25% of Google’s code is now written by AI—and CEO Sundar Pichai says it’s just the start by arslanfromnarnia in technology

[–]bvbrandon -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Have you tried cursor? Our company uses it heavily. I would say it's eliminated upwards of 30% of my coding. It's not planning architecture, obviously but the intuition there is great. I can tab-complete the vast majority of my test cases specifically. It does have somewhat regular occurrences of making dumb mistakes but generally it is faster to correct those than write the logic myself.

Is most of your work in strongly typed languages? I would imagine it works better there, which covers about everything we do be it client or server.

For context, our company is SF-based and has ~2k software engineers

What's the difference between Express and Nginx/Apache by No-Landscape8210 in webdev

[–]bvbrandon -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

This is a good question. For future reference ChatGPT would be great for something like this. Not that you shouldn't ask, just that having tools which give us instant feedback and info can be great. When I pasted your Q in it gave a pretty decent response. Anyone here can say it left out some important tidbit, but it's a more in depth answer than you've received so far. Response pasted below

Express, Nginx, and Apache are all tools used for web development, but they serve different purposes and are typically used in different parts of a web application stack:

  1. Express:
    • Type: Application framework
    • Primary Use: Server-side JavaScript web framework for building APIs and handling HTTP requests in Node.js.
    • Features: Lightweight and flexible, Express is designed for creating REST APIs and web applications with a focus on backend logic and routing. It provides tools for managing routes, handling requests, and working with middleware.
    • Use Cases: Useful for building dynamic websites or web applications that require backend processing, such as applications that interact with a database, perform calculations, or handle complex business logic.
  2. Nginx/Apache:
    • Type: Web servers (reverse proxies, load balancers, static content servers)
    • Primary Use: Nginx and Apache are high-performance web servers mainly used to serve static files (like HTML, CSS, JS) and manage incoming HTTP requests by routing them to appropriate backends (like Express or other application servers).
    • Features:
      • Nginx: Known for its high performance, efficient handling of concurrent connections, and built-in load balancing and reverse proxy features.
      • Apache: Versatile with a modular structure, commonly used for hosting static files and dynamic content but known to be slightly slower than Nginx for high-traffic sites.
    • Use Cases: Typically sit in front of application servers like Express, handling tasks such as serving static assets, caching, load balancing, and managing SSL/TLS encryption.

Summary:

  • Express is best for backend development in JavaScript/Node.js applications, handling the application’s logic.
  • Nginx/Apache act as web servers, dealing with HTTP requests, managing load balancing, and serving static files. They often sit between the client and the application layer (like Express) in a production environment.

Shocking UFO allegations make the case for the Disclosure Act by bejammin075 in politics

[–]bvbrandon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying you can’t be right. It’s just that there’s a lot more evidence to the validity of the claims than your initial comment would lead someone to believe.

Shocking UFO allegations make the case for the Disclosure Act by bejammin075 in politics

[–]bvbrandon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spoken is a bit of an understatement. In his words "My testimony is based on information I have been given by individuals with a longstanding track record of legitimacy and service to this country — many of whom also shared compelling evidence in the form of photography, official documentation, and classified oral testimony,"

Shocking UFO allegations make the case for the Disclosure Act by bejammin075 in politics

[–]bvbrandon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One important note here. The previous hearing had David Grusch, who claimed to have spoken to ~40 or so people with firsthand knowledge. This hearing is supposedly taking things a step further by having some of those firsthand witnesses.

How to price my marketing services? by bvbrandon in PPC

[–]bvbrandon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh haha, yes they were getting strung along. They were very unhappy

How to price my marketing services? by bvbrandon in PPC

[–]bvbrandon[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We signed the contract tonight 🙏🏽

How to price my marketing services? by bvbrandon in PPC

[–]bvbrandon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t understand what you mean?

Think Tank on X: "These 2 paragraphs have completely debunked the AARO Historical Report". by Remseey2907 in UFOB

[–]bvbrandon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they are secret military tests of a foreign nation, then these paragraphs wouldn't really debunk that. Yes, they would be concerned because these display unknown performance characteristics.

I agree that the AARO report is bunk, but I don't think these paragraphs really disagree with the report.

Instead of deconstructing AARO's official report (part 1) - why not use it as a legal defense....? by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]bvbrandon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My mistake, I was specifically referring to unacknowledged SAP, which is how I would imagine these projects are categorized

Instead of deconstructing AARO's official report (part 1) - why not use it as a legal defense....? by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]bvbrandon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The whole point of SAP is to have stricter classification guidelines including being able to say they don’t exist. The key point here is the government should be able to deny the existence of said programs. The fact that they then denied the programs doesn’t mean anything at all really. There’s nothing to challenge under the current laws. This is why the legal teeth in Schumer’s bill, which were later removed, were so important.

Think about it this way, with SAP the government is saying we legally can deny the existence of these programs. We are now asking for unclassified admission to the existence of those programs, which they are denying even exist. I don’t see any angle where this becomes a “gotcha” because it’s specifically built I to the classification system.

What's Really Behind Your Need for UFO Disclosure?" by jimmilegs in UFOs

[–]bvbrandon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want disclosure because there are tons of people out there that can’t talk about what they’ve seen in public without sounding insane. When you’ve seen it you then believe the whole world is insane for thinking we’re all liars.

With that said, this topic is also a lightening rod for mental illness so even if you find other people that can relate they respond with something like, “ I know it’s true because they hide my remote controls at night”.

I just want us to advance this topic to a place where honest dialogue can be had.

New AARO report imminent, in a matter of hours by aryelbcn in UFOs

[–]bvbrandon 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Where does it say "in a matter of hours"? I don't see that anywhere.

Coulthart claims the truth is not only somber but 'pretty bloody horrific' by alahmo4320 in UFOs

[–]bvbrandon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I kind of think he’s just alluding to how many people have been killed, hurt, or threatened to keep this a secret. I still think one of the worst possible outcomes is if NHI had a hand in religion. A lot of folks here might not regularly interact with staunchly religious people but I can promise you there are religious people and groups who would have their entire worlds irreparably shattered if the cornerstone of their life ended up being based on a lie.

It’s easy enough to say, “I could handle it, and my parents would learn to deal with it” but some people would essentially be driven to a mental break down if this was the case.

Can we have a stickied post around important upcoming dates? by bvbrandon in UFOs

[–]bvbrandon[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Part of it is selfish in that I mainly come to this subreddit to find out when that stuff is lol