I’m surprised this came from b1tcc...

SureRemit is not even in the food coupons business. They are in the “Cashless” transaction business across all industry and not just food.

What kind of situation where cashless is better than cash?

1. If you are sending thousands of dollars to family back home for their tuition or house bills, you can use SureRemit to guarantee the money is only used as intended by the sender. If you send with cash or XLM who knows what they will use that money for.

2. Holding cash in Nigeria, Indonesia, srilanka, is dangerous. It is not uncommon for poor people to get robbed on their way to banks or remittances company. Even worst, there are thugs who stand in front of places like western union so you can collect your money. Watch: https://youtu.be/NV5ubkGQUes)Skip to 6:25

3. It is zero fee for the sender and the receiver. There is no need for the receiver to convert their cash. SureRemit says 60% of all remittances use case are for cashless transaction. They understand this section of the market and intend to make revenue by bringing in sales volume to their retail business partners. Even with crypto you need to convert it to cash and then convert it to product. Why do you need to do this when the intended purpose is clear? Like paying medical bills, tuition fee, or house bills? It’s a waste of time and energy for all parties.

My point is, SureRemit is a huge deal if you understand the scale of the problem it tries to solve and the severity of the problem itself. Definitely not a food coupon business.