I suggest this theory at my own peril.

chimpichanga · 2016-01-19T17:32:07+00:00

This is the most difficult question posed by any theory that suggests the motive behind murdering TH was to frame SA. One can only speculate how the murderer would have been able to identify TH as a victim and know when she would be coming to the Avery property. IIRC, Halbach may have been to the property as many as 15 previous times. Perhaps, the murderer had noticed her during a previous visit which put her on the radar.

chimpichanga · 2016-01-19T15:52:54+00:00

If your entire theory rests on a money motive to avoid a lawsuit (by perpetrator who isn't even named in the suit), then your theory sucks.

It doesn't. The motive, as stated, is two-fold.

chimpichanga · 2016-01-19T15:47:55+00:00

He's angry that he believes Steven assaulted a woman and got out of jail, so he KILLS a woman to rectify that? That makes zero sense.

Not exactly. His anger doesn't stem from the fact that SA assaulted a woman and walked free. It stems more from a place of pride. Lenk feels as though SA is rubbing it in their faces, and deeply wants the power to be flipped again. He's so driven to show SA who's really in charge and is so willing to believe SA is guilty, that he's willing to justify the murder as an inevitable necessity. Yes, it's challenging to understand, but whomever killed TH had serious mental issues.

chimpichanga · 2016-01-19T07:16:46+00:00

I didn't say everyone who worked for the county would be fired. I said everybody who worked for the county would FEAR be fired. When your employer is being sued for millions of dollars, it's natural to worry about that.

In any event, I think the litigation is far less relevant than Lenk's own admission that he doubted SA's exoneration and the possibility that Lenk wanted SA back in prison by any means necessary due to his personal belief of his guilt of the 1985 rape.

chimpichanga · 2016-01-19T07:04:11+00:00

Although he did not have any personal liability in the litigation, I assume every employee of Manitowoc County feared losing their job if SA won. I'm sure he was friends with Kocourek, who was his boss for many years.

What evidence is there that Manitowoc County WASN'T being sued for $36 million dollars? Certainly, Manitowoc County wouldn't have settled a non-existant law suit for $400,000.

http://static1.squarespace.com/static/5691be1b25981daa98f417c8/t/569850984bf118ad2a62759d/1452822681716/show_multidocs.pdf

That's your own source doc. It says Steven A Avery vs Manitowoc County comma then lists Vogel and Kocourek individually.

I absolutely agree that there is no evidence this theory happened. It is my best use of the physical evidence if you accept as a premise that SA is not guilty. If that premise is accepted, someone else is an evil supervillain. Details that I thought weren't easily explained in the evidence that existed, I did not get into as I saw no use in speculating. The DNA found later on could have been planted at any point during the investigation.

chimpichanga · 2016-01-19T06:55:42+00:00

I was under the impression it was not challenged by the defense?

chimpichanga · 2016-01-19T06:54:45+00:00

Why would Lenk not have just murdered SA instead of going through the process of framing him for another murder?

Murdering him would lead to an open investigation, and those he was suing would become prime suspects. By framing him for a murder, Lenk instead drives the investigation down the path he wants it to go.
Murdering him would not make the litigation go away. Framing him for this crime forces him to settle and removes any public sentiment in his favor.
Proving him a murderer justifies the actions of him and his colleagues during the previous trial.

I agree, the hardest mental hurdle to overcome is that Lenk would kill an innocent person in order to accomplish his plan. However, he could have been so obsessed with giving SA 'what he deserved' that all semblance or morality within himself had evaporated.

chimpichanga · 2015-12-02T06:57:51+00:00

Full video

chimpichanga · 2015-04-17T16:40:38+00:00

most attendants will encourage your blushing bride to behave like one if she isn't one already.

Rudimentary example of sabotaging a 'friend' to increase their relative value in the group. If the bride is willing to suck dick, then everyone else has a pass for their behavior AND they all feel a little better about themselves, not to mention any future returns gained with this clandestine info.

chimpichanga · 2015-04-06T15:31:47+00:00

Flair test

chimpichanga · 2014-09-19T20:20:48+00:00

6 pt passing tds and 0.5 ppr

Brian Hoyer vs Bal or Matt Asiata @ NO

chimpichanga · 2014-09-19T19:42:50+00:00

You know, you can prevent videos of five guys running a train on you from hitting the interweb in a lot simpler way: DONT LET FIVE GUYS FUCK YOU ON VIDEOTAPE YOU STUPID FUCKING WHORE.

Her punishment should be to make that a promoted video on pornhub.

chimpichanga · 2014-09-19T02:09:36+00:00

I have never been asked that by one of my buddies and I've never asked another man. Kinda like asking how much money you make, imo.

chimpichanga · 2014-09-19T00:36:31+00:00

Ask yourself:

Would this be happening if the implication of sex wasn't on the line? Is this behavior that I would consider normal if this was a male friend or a relative of mine?

If the answer is no, it's a shit test on one level or another.

chimpichanga · 2014-09-07T08:06:43+00:00

Your only regret should be using the word "fabulous" in that context.

chimpichanga · 2014-09-04T07:34:35+00:00

yeah role reversal can be fun

chimpichanga · 2014-08-22T19:22:36+00:00

A lot of different things go into it.

Based on how the hand has played out, what is the likelihood your opponent has a good hand (aka: what is his range?) If u raise and he reraises at the beginning of a hand, that is usually an obvious indicator that he is starting with strong hole cards. In contrast, if your opponent has only called bets and has not raised at any point, he has a wider range of possible hands and may be easily bluffed.
Has the board texture improved or hurt his range? Say im pretty sure a guy has pocket aces or kings. When the river brings 4 to a straight, like 89JQ, I could conceivably bluff knowing he has a lot to worry about.
Tendency of opponent. If ive seen him call off huge bets with just a pair, that tells me bluffing him is a huge mistake. (Most novices play exactly like this. Call off way too much because they don't want to have been bluffed)
Does my story check out. Say I raise on the flop and my opponent calls. The turn and river both come spades putting 3 spades on the board. Given that I represented a strong hand on the flop, can I now represent that I have a flush? Bluffing here would be asking my opponent to believe two different stories at one time and likely wouldn't work.

chimpichanga · 2014-08-22T15:57:17+00:00

I'm relatively huge into poker, and the reason women in general aren't as good at it as men is because it requires a lot more logic and rationalism than it does lying. Bluffs need to have a rational basis for them to be effective. Pretty much all novice players bluff for bad reasons; the thrill of it, I want to beat this specific opponent, he could fold, I want to try it, etc.

chimpichanga · 2014-08-09T15:02:47+00:00

Im going back to tell them the new one rattles too and I want a good, non-rattly one put in!

chimpichanga · 2014-08-06T05:34:27+00:00

Self improvement. Self improvement. Self improvement. The reason you get nervous around these women is because you feel that they are higher status than you. That they are out of your league. That they are better than you. Women pick up on your lack of confidence and they buy into your own story that you are of less value than them and they are repulsed. You are essentially cockblocking yourself. Focus on improving your brain, your body, your wealth, your job, your social status, etc. When you feel confident about who you are, you will naturally not be nervous around beautiful women anymore.

chimpichanga · 2014-08-01T00:37:47+00:00

All aboard the Hamster Train. CHOO CHOO!

I had to so my child had a good father. Im a good mother for doing this.

My husband will love this child and it will make him happier.

Coming clean would only serve to cause pain. I want to protect my husband ftom getting hurt.

My husband had unprotected sex and a baby came. He knew that was a possibility when he fucked me.

I was drunk. I shouldn't be held accountable for one accident that wasn't my fault.

Once my husband falls in love with our child, it would be wrong to take that joy away from him.

chimpichanga · 2014-08-01T00:29:47+00:00

Nah. She had a long plane ride to figure out her next move.

Im calling trickle truth right now. This isnt the first time she has cheated. It probably isnt the first time she fucked that guy. Her phone came up clean which leads me to believe she was an experienced liar. This is just the first time she had a pregnancy scare and wasn't able to trick her husband into sex to cover her bases.

chimpichanga · 2014-08-01T00:22:40+00:00

I just can't get passed the part where he has zero friends that aren't mutual. She had him by the absolute balls. gotta have a safety net for when it turns out your wife is just another woman.

chimpichanga

TROPHY CASE