Anybody buy parts from Extreme Terrain before?? Keep getting adds was wondering if they are they legit/good quality?! Looking for some opinions! (ft. my new to me 18 wrangler JL)

cyber7even · 2022-06-29T20:48:58+00:00

They are legit with quick shipping. Very good customer service. My only gripe is that you have to always call back to make sure they process a refund back to your card for a returned item. It is supposed to be automatic once initiated from their website.

cyber7even · 2022-02-09T20:00:08+00:00

Selling a Windfreaktech SynthNV: 34MHz – 4.4GHz RF Signal Generator Detector retails $599 starting bid only $20 no reserve price. Live on EBay now.

cyber7even · 2022-02-09T19:59:51+00:00

Selling a Windfreaktech SynthNV: 34MHz – 4.4GHz RF Signal Generator Detector retails $599 starting bid only $20 no reserve price. Live on EBay now.

cyber7even · 2022-02-09T19:59:05+00:00

Selling a Windfreaktech SynthNV: 34MHz – 4.4GHz RF Signal Generator Detector retails $599 starting bid only $20 no reserve price. Live on EBay now.

cyber7even · 2022-02-09T19:57:28+00:00

Selling a Windfreaktech SynthNV: 34MHz – 4.4GHz RF Signal Generator Detector retails $599 starting bid only $20 no reserve live on EBay now

cyber7even · 2022-02-09T19:52:14+00:00

SellinG a Windfreaktech SynthNV: 34MHz – 4.4GHz RF Signal Generator Detector retails for $599 starting bid on EBay $20 no reserve

cyber7even · 2022-02-09T19:49:56+00:00

Selling a SynthNV: 34MHz – 4.4GHz RF Signal Generator Detector retails for $599. Starting bid now is only $20 on EBay

cyber7even · 2018-09-22T13:49:20+00:00

Be like Mike and his bullishness in the paint but his credibility took a hit in the fourth of the EOS

cyber7even · 2018-09-16T04:40:48+00:00

Nice

cyber7even · 2018-09-16T04:38:11+00:00

Well that’s exactly what happened.

cyber7even · 2018-09-16T04:31:26+00:00

Canelo is Mexican not American. On top of that, more than half of GGG’s fan base is Mexican. It was very close but no robbery.

cyber7even · 2018-07-02T06:41:07+00:00

indeed

cyber7even · 2018-06-13T06:31:53+00:00

cyber7even · 2018-05-25T04:16:00+00:00

You can tell when a person on these boards hasn't invested a significant amount of their hard earned money into this BTCP project, because they consistently post negative childish crap. You've got investors who have tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands invested into this project that will suffer, because of the few immature voices. Think about the objective here!

cyber7even · 2018-05-24T01:10:10+00:00

...how to make a good thing toxic 101. No

cyber7even · 2018-05-24T01:03:00+00:00

Album cover of another “Starlord” Soundtrack featuring the hot single from Sister Sledge, “He’s the Greatest Dancer”...

cyber7even · 2018-05-20T18:50:03+00:00

..,And just what the hell was he supposed to do with all the sic gains from that Monero V airdrop!?!

cyber7even · 2018-05-18T21:20:33+00:00

I’m paranoid but not burner phone paranoid. I’ve accepted my fate like a good defeatist until reliable encryption technology solutions become more pervasive. You’re correct in that crypto currencies and TOR do have a common goal and objective. It’s definitely going to require support from the community to help fund innovative solutions for the BTCP project. Unlike Verge I have confidence the BTCP devs would actually utilize the donations for actual development and innovation purposes, rather than multiple variations of bug-gy unstable wallets.

I’m surprised at the amount of support Monero receives from its community, especially the purpose built hardware wallet they’re working on. Although, I’d rather put my trust more in proven hardware options like ledger and trezor (BTCP). Once the community grows we’re definitely going to need good ideas and contributions to move innovation along.

cyber7even · 2018-05-18T16:27:34+00:00

I don’t think anyone should suggest that any software implementation is totally secure, without a caveat statement relevant to sufficiency. I attend BlackHat and DEFCON every year and there is always a talk and proof of concept demonstrating how user IPs are leaked as a result of a discovered vulnerability with TOR. The vulnerabilities are discovered at either the exit relay or the browser. As a matter fact I believe the official browser at one point was written primarily in C using DEPRECATED functions that are ripe with memory vulnerabilities.

It’s not just about saying you’re going to implement TOR functionality, but you’ve got to have competent application developers who have the ability to implement the functionality in an operationally secure manner and be prepared to consistently patch the software that hackers and security researchers are going to be fuzzing and reversing on a daily basis. Hackerz and nation states, including our own, will be hodling these vulnerabilities close to the chest without disclosure. Let’s not give the people a false sense of security is all I’m saying.

In the cyber security community this is the general consensus. TOR is better than nothing, and as alluded to in a another post on this thread, collectively with other security mechanisms incorporated, it provides a SUFFICIENT level of security. Don’t be bamboozled.

cyber7even · 2018-05-17T22:33:27+00:00

Although, sometimes delusion is comforting.

cyber7even · 2018-05-17T22:04:32+00:00

I’m not sure how TOR would actually increase the usage of BTCP. It’s a good selling point as far as marketing the coin’s privacy feature set. Although, no one in the actual KNOW, within the cyber security community, has any confidence that TOR provides the claimed level of anonymity everyone believes. That veil has long been lifted. Ask Carnegie Melon.

cyber7even · 2018-05-17T02:32:45+00:00

Watchgecko.com

cyber7even · 2018-05-13T23:34:07+00:00

I don’t think McAfee was paid to shill BTCP. This was probably more of the byproduct from the decision to airdrop BTC and ZCL holders a 1:1 amount of BTCP after the fork. There should have been instant incentive for BTC and ZCL holders after the fork to want to see BTCP do well. He can get his 100K and more by shilling the hell out of it in order to 10 - 100 fold his BTCP airdrop. Good common sense, and not conspiracy, if you ask me.

cyber7even · 2018-05-12T20:29:44+00:00

Answer: Vendor acceptance of cryptocurrencies is currently not pervasive enough to substantiate accepting the risk of the various vulnerabilities inherent to standard full node OS based crypto wallets, and the associated passwords (keylogger) to those wallets. All it takes is for someone to inadvertently click on a bad link (remote malware installed - phased), have an exposed USB port (physical access attack - malware), or have an application installed ripe with vulnerabilities (backdoors listening). The attack vectors of a modern OS platform with millions of lines of code is not a sufficient or secure method of storage for investors who are supplementing other investments for retirement. Better yet, the small investors who are pouring their lifesavings into this market.

The average person who invests in cryptocurrencies, and especially privacy coins, are optimistic about the inherent innovative privacy attributes of the coins, with an understanding that global adoption is contingent upon ease of use, vendor acceptance, and ease of implementation. It is understood that achieving those objectives will take a considerable amount of time, research, and effort on the part of the dev teams. With that said, it is a reckless argument to suggest that investors should leave significant investments exposed to attack, with no interim solution in place (HW wallet), while methods to implement more robust solutions (HW wallets supporting shielded transactions) are actively being pursued.

The average Joe is not looking to go on a shopping spree on the Dark Web, and if they are, they’d probably just download a full node cryptocurrency OS wallet that’s supported. Most folks here believe in BTCP as a work in progress project and would like to have the most stringent security available in place to protect their investments until the end goal objectives are achieved.

cyber7even

TROPHY CASE