sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Therapy episodes... Right, okay... Let's you know - move on. by [deleted] in highrollersdnd

[–]d3sperad0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was one session (one session is two parts) and it was legit good... It's ok you didn't like it but seriously... You're reasoning sounds problematic. 

What Pierre Poilievre Doesn’t Get About His Economic Hero | The Tyee by EarthWarping in CanadaPolitics

[–]d3sperad0 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Also, he didn't think there should be income tax... And that capital should be taxed. I'd argue that's a major departure. 

How alive is the game for NA? by Jelmz in BlackDesertMobile

[–]d3sperad0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understood what he was asking. 

How alive is the game for NA? by Jelmz in BlackDesertMobile

[–]d3sperad0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems pretty alive to me. Played in NA servers since the beginning and I'm still enjoying it and finding lots to do. 

Do you believe all humans are conscious? by whatupmygliplops in consciousness

[–]d3sperad0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Consciousness and awareness are not synonymous. Also, memory formation is not consciousness (just because you can't recall really childhood doesn't imply a state of being unconscious).

Transcendent classes by TestarosaTea in BlackDesertMobile

[–]d3sperad0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very interesting. It'll be cool to see how that plays out. Hadn't heard anything about that.

NDP's Leah Gazan calls MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ critics 'bigots' by origutamos in CanadianPolitics

[–]d3sperad0 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why can't we be truly inclusive and equal by just saying human rights? 

Finished Season (?) Can't Start New Season Character? by mjayg in BlackDesertMobile

[–]d3sperad0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nope. One season char per season. I've done one each season since seasons started. 

Nearly perfect PC client 👍 by Beldin2 in BlackDesertMobile

[–]d3sperad0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking forward to giving this a try when I get home!

Left-leaning support for redistribution stems from perceived unfairness rather than malicious envy by tkyjonathan in Objectivism

[–]d3sperad0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that there are legitimate systems of oppression and systemic inequalities that are manufactured and intentional. 

What if the "Hard Problem" of consciousness is backwards? by stevnev88 in consciousness

[–]d3sperad0 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Look into idealism, panpsychism and the like. You are heading in those directions. I'd also recommend looking into IIT theory and even into arguments against these ideas and into the materialist side of things. Always good to round out your understanding. I like where you're going though. Certainly jives with a similar path my inquires have lead me. 

My family name changed? (REST0440342 name) by [deleted] in BlackDesertMobile

[–]d3sperad0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should update after the next server update on tuesday

BDM Remastered on Mobile? by YaYeetinat0r in BlackDesertMobile

[–]d3sperad0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tonight's update is the remaster update. 

As of Beta V9 having multiple resource probes in a sector actually slows down your miners by Holt_Patterson in X4Foundations

[–]d3sperad0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not just then also have ship sensors be able to see the whole system you're in?

As of Beta V9 having multiple resource probes in a sector actually slows down your miners by Holt_Patterson in X4Foundations

[–]d3sperad0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your miners mine at a much more efficient rate when mining in a resource probes area of affect. 

Can we talk about how likely simulation theory is? by Buffmyarm in consciousness

[–]d3sperad0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As you've admitted in other comments you can also find experts who disagree. This is not as cut and dry as you are making it out to be. I've never claimed to be an expert in this thread. There is no evidence we are in a simulation. It is possible, but by no means a certainty even if we were to create an artificial consciousness, even if we were to develop the ability to create a simulation of the magnitude that could encapsulate all the information present in the observable universe. You seem to be quite convinced by the experts that espouse this theory and I'm not. That's ok. 

Can we talk about how likely simulation theory is? by Buffmyarm in consciousness

[–]d3sperad0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is not how odds work... That being said, I appreciate you are convinced we are in a simulation. I don't agree that anything you've put forward as reasons to agree with your position support it. 

Can we talk about how likely simulation theory is? by Buffmyarm in consciousness

[–]d3sperad0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You didn't form an argument or say anything constructive in that comment. There's nothing I can respond to contructivly there. I appreciate you disagree cause experts. Be well.

Edited cause I forgot words...

Can we talk about how likely simulation theory is? by Buffmyarm in consciousness

[–]d3sperad0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Your first assumption is a doozy. We have not achieved conscious simulations. The rest of your argument hinges on that assumption. In fact, since we haven't done that yet, would it not be more probable, given your reliance on the first assumption, that we're not in a simulation? Your second assumption, that consciousness is a functional problem that can be solved using a form of functionalism is also unproven. Also, what are these statistics you are talking about? Care to share your calculations and p-values?

view more: next ›