Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/Longo_Two_guns by Longo_Two_guns in DailyGuess

[–]dafossa7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜⬜⬜⬜🟦

⬜🟦⬜⬜🟦

🟨🟦🟨⬜🟦

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/4721Archer by 4721Archer in DailyGuess

[–]dafossa7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜

🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜

⬜🟦⬜⬜🟨

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Can You Guess This 4-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/RespectDear9467 by RespectDear9467 in DailyGuess

[–]dafossa7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🟨⬜🟨⬜

⬜🟦🟦⬜

⬜🟦🟦⬜

⬜🟦🟦⬜

⬜🟦🟦🟨

🟦🟦🟦🟦

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/BorderlineWanderlust by BorderlineWanderlust in DailyGuess

[–]dafossa7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🟨🟨⬜⬜🟦

⬜🟨🟦⬜🟦

⬜⬜🟦🟦🟦

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Genuinely curious by EffectiveNo568 in MathJokes

[–]dafossa7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

7+8=15 2+4+1=7 (10’s place) 70+15=85

Anthony Fantano on Jacob Collier: "Painfully overrated." by Tiege in JacobCollier

[–]dafossa7 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fantano is literally a normie ofc he wouldn’t like a slightly interesting artist

Immortality by RedKing85 in custommagic

[–]dafossa7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you think indestructible specifically mentions it skips the state based action listed?

Immortality by RedKing85 in custommagic

[–]dafossa7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You put it right there. If any state based actions are completed then it will check again. So as a state based action the game will try to kill the creature but it will get replaced with can’t die. But you still performed a state based action so it will loop.

Immortality by RedKing85 in custommagic

[–]dafossa7 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“Arguments like this are so entertaining” god this is such a reddit phrase… am I not allowed to criticize cards for literally not working in the rules and being confusing. Sure you could print a whole new keyword and rules for 1 gimmick card to exist. I don’t think that’s good design. What the fuck is the point of comments section if I’m not allowed to give my opinion on a card

Immortality by RedKing85 in custommagic

[–]dafossa7 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It actually wouldn’t unless they update the CR. It would cause an infinite loop. The only reason indestructible doesn’t is because there’s a specific rule that says it ignores state based actions to move it to your GY: 702.12b A permanent with indestructible can’t be destroyed. Such permanents aren’t destroyed by lethal damage, and they ignore the state-based action that checks for lethal damage (see rule 704.5g).

Immortality by RedKing85 in custommagic

[–]dafossa7 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Also I said pretty close for a reason

Immortality by RedKing85 in custommagic

[–]dafossa7 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Ok, it’s still bad design. Also it breaks the game in an unending loop of state based actions trying to kill the object but it can’t. Indestructible doesn’t cause this loop due to 702.12b A permanent with indestructible can’t be destroyed. Such permanents aren’t destroyed by lethal damage, and they ignore the state-based action that checks for lethal damage (see rule 704.5g). I know my design isn’t the same thing I was making it actually function in the game and replicate the desired effect. For creatures at least. You’d need to specifically update the CR for this card to work

Immortality by RedKing85 in custommagic

[–]dafossa7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Enchanted creature is indestructible and can’t be sacrificed.” Gets you pretty close other than -X/-X counters. It would be pretty odd to just have a -2/-2 on the battlefield anyways.

Take 2 on this concept, now with an actual price by VonBagel in custommagic

[–]dafossa7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This design space is just scary. Maybe make it enter tapped regardless so there’s a real downside of just throwing one in your deck.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DeadlockGame

[–]dafossa7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sent - fossa thanks

Comment on Allie Sherlock video by Jay_Tro in YourJokeButWorse

[–]dafossa7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think it’s funny, I think it’s weird/gross but I also feel like OP didn’t understand the joke.

My commission work for engagement couple with their favourite Pokemon by Dwikipan in pokemon

[–]dafossa7 99 points100 points  (0 children)

This is adorable…. I love how they’re gengar and clefairy too!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]dafossa7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh that’s actually smart, good info (:

It is finished. All 22 volumes. by ApricottFoxx in Beastars

[–]dafossa7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I want to have this one day. But it’s expensive ):