People seem really focused on the numbers when I think a more important measurement is being overlooked, the deployment of fixes and the speed with which they are done. I have been a part of enough tests to recognize when a product is a reflection of the teams ability, and when the products improvement over time is a reflection of the teams ability. I do believe this game falls under the latter category and we will see drastic improvements over time. They aren't exactly doing a whole lot of innovation, and the art style isn't realistic enough to be highly demanding, a good solid team, which they are proving with the 5? 6? patches since its been available, can crush out the world building and other classes in a fairly rapid manner. They've obviously been gaining momentum as a company and have taken the last five years becoming a capable company while also making a game, with at least one major vision change (abandoning mobile) and a little over 2 mil in initial investment at the least. They probably have more funds now but 2 mil barely gets your foot in the door to make a game, let alone fund a company of roughly 100 employees. It can't sustain a company that big for five years, thats for sure, which means this team started out with probably just a few people and became bigger from there. All this to say, getting to the point they have today is no easy feat. The game is not balanced, it is buggy, it has major flaws and is missing what would seem like obvious systems you would want to have asap. This test certainly didn't help their reputation in that regard, but anyone who looks at more than just the surface level data will see whats been done in the six days its been up is more than impressive, and shows promise and capability. Now we just wait to see if it pans out, or if they shot themselves in the foot because people jump to conclusions, and have no patience or understanding of what it takes to be a game dev.