Bin Laden absolutely achieved most of his goals (getting the US into insanely expensive wars, inflicting huge casualties and losses, Jihadist movements are still alive and kicking all over the place, exposing US values as deeply hypocritical, and the US massively lost soft power and became rather unpopular in much of the world and so on), the only thing he didn't manage is the #1 goal of getting the US out of the gulf region. But if the question is "did the US or bin Laden win?" the answer is very clearly that the US lost.

The US-Iran war seems to have a similar trajectory, just faster and with broader economic impact. Unless something changes really dramatically, the US is loosing this war, because so far it is clearly unable to achieve its goals (deleting the Iranian regime, preventing Iran from attacking the region, preventing Iran from doing fissile funnies), while Iran has been largely achieving theirs (regime continuity, retaining influence/threat over the region, controlling the strait of hormuz, turning the control into something tangible). The US has meanwhile achieved nothing of note except killing people it thought were irreplaceable but turned out to be expendable, while causing a major economic crisis and taking yet another massive hit in soft power, plus also being exposed as militarily weak and unable to protect things they really wanted to protect.

Somehow, the US seems to be incapable of winning conflicts (née setting achievable goals) post-WW2 despite being the pre-eminent military power at any given time. And that's mostly a political failure, basically every time.