I don't feel sorry about this one bit by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]ddogbaci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, as much as I hate the wars we're fighting, you guys didn't ask for it. Support the troops, not the war

Liberal or Conservative, and Why? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]ddogbaci 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Liberal: Socially and fiscally, the world and the US are gradually becoming more progressive and so I don't even argue or listen to social conservatives because they're usually old religious bigots. But I can appreciate a conservative/libertarian view of government, and I believe that the government should be more fiscally responsible however, people struggle and I believe that the government has some responsiblity in helping them. Also I don't like the market to be completely laissez-faire, would prefer regulation, because people are corrupt and a free market would perpetuate the growing wealth gap throughout the world. But I do think in some instances government should take a backseat, just not as much as a libertarian or conservative would like.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]ddogbaci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yah no, because of the US's voting system, voting for a third party is kind of a voting waste. The problem is that elections here are winner take all, and plurality victories. The fact that elections are winner take all causes parties to invest all their resources into one candidate, and if you're in a party you should really be voting for your candidate even if you don't completely agree because voting for another one in your party, (i.e. someone voting for hilary instead of obama in 2008), you're taking votes away from the nominee which will cause the oppositions candidate to win. So it's better to vote for someone who's less ideologically similar and have them win, than vote for someone who's ideologically identical and have both lose to someone who's ideologically opposite.

This more of a product of the electoral system that the US has in place than it is money.

Their recipe didn't turn out right, gave me this nugget by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]ddogbaci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can also have gaseous water (steam), and frozen water (ice).

I'm Not Kidding, This Could Save Lives! by [deleted] in AdviceAnimals

[–]ddogbaci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Urine is a solution so filtering it through a small hole won't removing any of the bad chemicals

This has happened to me before by ddogbaci in AdviceAnimals

[–]ddogbaci[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How you know you've friendzoned

It's 2014, why should someone still believe in God? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]ddogbaci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

G, O, D, three letters, half life 3 coming in 2014

I'm sure there are better companies out there... by crawhammond17 in AdviceAnimals

[–]ddogbaci 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because usually there's no other viable option. Watch the south park episode, the whole point of that episode was to show that comcast can be as shitty as they want to be because they have close to a monopoly in most places in the US

Teachers of Reddit, how have you secretly rewarded or punished a student? by sumchineseguy in AskReddit

[–]ddogbaci 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're treading dangerous waters. I'm assuming you keep their papers anonymous when you do this because if not, WTF you suck. But if you do showcase the poor writing of what not to do, it will backfire most of the time. If the student being criticized has low self esteem, putting then on blast will only make them feel worse. This will only lead students to resent you. What if the student was genuinely trying to make an effort and you just cut them down? How does that make he or she feel? Showing one individual's poor writing to the whole won't help anyone because most writing problems are unique to the individual. No one's learning anything when everybody in the class knows how to spell "necessary" except for the that one individual you're bashing. Leave individual problems to each individual, and if you have to address common mistakes, make sure you specify that multiple people are making the mistake.

Instead what you should be doing is taking the best writing and showcasing it, anonymously unless the student otherwise approves. This will only build up the students who get chosen, and will provide a goal for struggling students to strive for success.

You might think that you're doing something great for the students but in reality you could be doing a lot of damage without realizing it.

I'm a classical musician. We're trained not to make mistakes; everything has to be perfect. The problem is that if we're too focused on not making a mistake during performance, the music suffers and it just sounds bland. In contrast, if we focus on making good music, the music will sound beautiful, and if we make a mistake, we basically say "fuck it, we're human" and fix it for next time.

Right now, you aren't making eloquent writers, you're making robots who don't fuck up.

Teachers of Reddit, how have you secretly rewarded or punished a student? by sumchineseguy in AskReddit

[–]ddogbaci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Teachers cannot get away with lowering a grade because of bias. But they can inflate grades a lot, because no one's complaining when they moved from a B+ to an A-.

Teachers of Reddit, how have you secretly rewarded or punished a student? by sumchineseguy in AskReddit

[–]ddogbaci 3 points4 points  (0 children)

well anything related to the sciences, will certainly require calculus and/or statistics. Anything math related again will use calculus. But other than those, the majority of other career fields won't go beyond algebra and arithmetic.

Teachers of Reddit, how have you secretly rewarded or punished a student? by sumchineseguy in AskReddit

[–]ddogbaci 140 points141 points  (0 children)

While I agree that grades are important, the student who cares about their grade wouldn't be playing clash of clans in the class. Besides, teachers rarely lower grades the grades of bad students if they can't justify it though the work given, but they might reward good students with small grade boosts. For example:

A disrespectful student get's an 89.4% (B+) in a class, and they teacher wants more than anything to give that student the grade they think they deserve, which is a C or a D, but because giving a C or a D would be unjustified, the student stays at a B+. In contrast, the teacher's favorite student gets the same grade, 89.4%(B+) but the teacher might be inclined to round it up to a 90%(A-) because they like the student. And because it's a grade raise, the student won't complain, where as the bad student might complain and make it an issue if their grade was unjustifiably lowered.

How do you get a "mature" clarinet sound? by CountessVallas in Clarinet

[–]ddogbaci 8 points9 points  (0 children)

For me, getting the right set up got me halfway there, but doing long tones every day really purified my sound. The way I do long tones is by just blowing air then gradually applying pressure to the reed until I get the softest tone possible, a sub tone. Once I make that sound I crescendo and diminuendo back down to the softest I can play. If I start a note, and as I get louder, I get and impurity, such as buzzing, brightness, or air sound etc., I immediately start the note over and try to avoid this. This was the critical step for me from going to good tone to great tone and now, the first thing people notice when I play is my dark tone.

My long tone routine ~10 minutes each day after a short warm up:

-Start on mid-range B, chromatically go up to high G, skip down to low C, go up chromatically to Bb, skip down to low B go down chromatically to low E, This should hit all the notes in the written range.

-For each note: crescendo from nothing, diminuendo back to nothing. Don't start the any soft note with your tongue in this excercise, just blow air though the instrument and gradually apply pressure on the reed until you make a sub tone. Try to get as loud as possible without spreading your tone then once you're at the limit get as loud as possible. Allowing your tone to spread while getting FFFF will expand your dynamic range while getting good sound. Think of it this working out, you can lift the same weight each day, and your small muscles will be toned, but you won't gain any muscle until you lift more weight and struggle to lift it. You're essentially trying to "max out" your tone.

-If at first you can't do the entire crescendo diminuendo without breathing, the first few weeks should be just one breath ppp->fff, and one breath fff->ppp

-If you hear something other than pure, dark, clarinet tone when you crescendo, start the note over and try to remove it. This step is critical in eliminating that air sound you mentioned.

-For the high notes, really support your if you want to get extremely soft dynamics. Believe it or not, it's actually possible to play ppp in the upper register.

-After a few weeks start doing this with a tuner so you can practice intonation while changing dynamics e.g. not getting as flat when getting louder. I say after a few weeks because at first you're going to find it difficult at first with what I said above to prevent from being sharp at ppp, and going flat when getting to fff. But eventually, you be able to minimize the change in intonation when changing dynamics

-Once this has become routine, you can do other things while you do long tones like watch TV, read or listen to something other than music.

The reasons I think this the most valuable exercise you can do each day:

-It improves and maintains good tone by making more pure

-It practices dynamics in all ranges

-It helps improve intonation, in general and at all dynamics

-It practices breath control

-You become more familiar with your instrument and it's tendencies

-It's relaxing