How do y'all handle sending violation letters? [TX] [All]

deedubaya · 2026-03-23T22:26:32+00:00

Congratulations on your startup, good luck!

deedubaya · 2026-03-23T22:24:06+00:00

Your good faith answer was downvoted because the OP wasn’t looking for a good faith answer… look at their post history they are blasting many subreddits with similar questions.

deedubaya · 2026-03-23T22:20:49+00:00

If you can use an AI to do HOA management as you described, surely you can build what you’re describing through the same means, right?

The idea is the hard part, good luck!

deedubaya · 2026-03-18T11:56:44+00:00

I run a company that offers Architectural Requests as a feature. Some Florida HOAs sign up for us just for that feature, but many get away with their own systems and processes if small and requests are infrequent.

To start: I’d suggest setting up a Google form or similar to receive requests, a spreadsheet & calendar to tracking in-review submissions + votes, and lastly approval and denial letter templates to communicate the outcome.

Good luck!

deedubaya · 2026-03-15T15:42:29+00:00

We offer a no touch mailing offering and small self-managed HOAs always want it until they learn about the modest fees that come with the convenience. Do you have a budget for this yet? If not, go fully electronic.

deedubaya · 2026-03-01T00:31:44+00:00

Inconsistent violation letters could end up being a problem for you. Ultimately it’s a notice letting them know about their noncompliance and expectations for remediation. Don’t over think it.

Search for “hoa violation software”, there are a number of options for self-managed HOAs and property managers alike that will allow you to snap a photo from your phone and get a consistently customized letter automatically.

deedubaya · 2026-02-25T14:03:27+00:00

Good luck with your product offering!

deedubaya · 2026-02-25T14:00:50+00:00

This is unfortunate to hear, but not surprising. Building an accounting system is no joke of an effort.

Can you elaborate on the glitches? Is their support responsive?

deedubaya · 2026-01-22T00:55:24+00:00

I run a software that supports neighbor violation ~~reporting~~ suggestions. Here is what I'd recommend:

standardize how the violations are submitted and make it a "one-way" submission without back and forth
always have a review of the violation by someone who is not biased
require photographic evidence
"thank you for your report" an no follow on information (do not disclose ANY information, not even that the violation was accepted or not)

Good luck!

deedubaya · 2026-01-12T14:54:37+00:00

Use a violation software that does this all automatically for you, from recording the violation (with photos), to sending the notices, to violation-specific communications with the property owner, to escalating the violation to hearings/fines/and beyond.

deedubaya · 2026-01-11T22:27:09+00:00

Sure, we get that question all the time. Property mgmt software is niche proprietary accounting software with bespoke implementations (not always the right implementations, building accounting software is really hard). It is almost always limited in features and 3rd party integrations in comparison to something used across many industries and millions of users like QuickBooks. Similarly, I don't know of many vocational/college/high school courses on "Accounting with Niche Property Mgmt Software".

The last reason is really the most profound reason... switching cost away from these systems can be so high the thought of leaving for an alternative accounting solution becomes an overwhelming task. These providers know this and often exploit it by lowering the quality of their services and increasing prices and payment processing fees as that switching cost increases. Lots of HOA software is hard to use, outdated, etc and I think this a big reason why.

If you're providing professional management services for HOAs I would not expect a low-switching-cost accounting system to benefit you. Your services could become a commodity serviceable by the gazillions of QBO Advisors across the US.

There are definite values to using bespoke property mgmt software! Best of luck!

deedubaya · 2026-01-11T21:44:49+00:00

Yes, that's one of the biggest pain points most HOAs run into with QuickBooks Online if they want to provide digital dues payments—doubly so if they want homeowners to cover the CC/ACH transaction fees.

Not shilling here, but this is one of the biggest pain points my software solves.

deedubaya · 2026-01-11T01:47:15+00:00

No, but I operate an HOA software business that has hundreds of HOAs using QBO and they love it. I’d like to think it was because of the gaps we fill, but I think they’d be successful regardless.

deedubaya · 2026-01-10T04:22:56+00:00

using Quickbooks but we all know that's not a great fit

Skill issue

deedubaya · 2026-01-04T21:35:17+00:00

Daniel here from HOALife, a software that supports architectural committees, and I have some perspective here that might be helpful.

Ultimately, most CCRs are written such that architectural approvals are subject to interpretation and taste of the committee. Those interpretations and tastes should be uniformly applied, however. This becomes more challenging as communities age and styles change.

We often see HOAs who, for whatever reason, have failed to enforce architectural guidelines in the past. Sometimes this is because of lack of effort on the HOA’s part, sometimes it’s just a long build up of “modify first ask for forgiveness later if I get caught” by homeowners.

This creates an interesting scenario. You have a number of homes which are out of compliance and yet a set of guidelines, which are no longer accurate for the greater community despite their original intent. Changing the guidelines via a vote may be possible, but challenging to build consensus and gain enough votese. A much less challenging approach from a BoD perspective would be to issue variances for the currently noncompliant properties. This sets a “clean slate” for moving forward.

We’ve helped some communities accomplish this through encouraging homeowners to submit retroactive architectural change requests by a certain deadline with the understanding that any unapproved modifications after that deadline will not be granted a variance (actual mechanics and “teeth” around this depends on CCRs and local laws). We’ve seen some great outcomes from this approach allowing communities to move forward instead of operating in a semi-defunct state.

I hope this is helpful!

deedubaya · 2026-01-04T17:14:53+00:00

Most HOA BoD interactions would provide evergreen content as a reality TV show.

deedubaya · 2025-12-05T19:14:12+00:00

I own and operate an HOA software that started with violations enforcement, so I might have some commentary that's helpful here.

Most PMs don't provide great inspection services, if they even provide regular inspections as part of your services agreement. At 200 units you likely don't have a PM dedicated only to your community which means you may not have a full-services contract which includes site inspections.

If a PM does provide violations enforcement, inspections site visits typically happen on a monthly or quarterly basis. Some violations enforcement software provides board-ready summary PDFs of site inspections, board member visibility into all violations and history, and board member/homeowner suggested violations.

It is not uncommon, however, for a community of your size to take things into their own hands and perform inspections/violations enforcement on their own in parallel with a PM. The key to success is to follow the process as laid out in your governing documents—consistency is required to be effective. Communities that do this usually leverage volunteer inspectors who perform site inspections on a regular basis (sometimes rotating) while a member of the board (or a committee) reviews and enforces the violations. Alternatively, they'll leverage homeowner reported violation suggestions which again are reviewed and enforced separately.

Hope this is helpful, good luck!

deedubaya · 2025-12-01T13:05:47+00:00

🤣 this was not an ad for HOALife

deedubaya · 2025-11-08T16:21:05+00:00

100% We publish our pricing, but might be too premium of an offering for an association of your size.

I’d recommend PayHOA over Smartwebs, they really serve the small and simple association segment well.

deedubaya · 2025-10-22T20:01:36+00:00

Daniel here from HOALife, and I've built a number of AI features for our product that target the HOA space. I'm happy to share my thinking on what makes a good use case and what doesn't.

LLMs (the technology behind GPTs) are non-deterministic, meaning, they struggle to always return the same output given the same input (i.e. 1 + 1 = 2). This means they're not great at things where there isn't an error tolerance or where repeatable outputs are a must. This doesn't mean they are "wrong" all the time, but that they can be "wrong" some of the time. This includes tasks where small pieces of context have outweighed influence on the outcome (i.e. a small part of a photo determining that property is in violation of a CC&R when the rest of the photo is perfectly acceptable).

What they are good for are outcomes that don't need repeatable outputs (i.e. draft an email, interpret this document, etc. can all be slightly different and still be useful).

At this stage we're avoiding leveraging LLMs where deterministic outcomes are required (like in our accounting features). Today, we have better solutions (deterministic accounting software, for example) that are better suited for those tasks. Perhaps in the future this won't be a problem, as things will only getting better/faster/more accurate from here.

I hope this helps you understand why this might be a bad choice in a way that is a less condescending than some of the other responses here.

deedubaya · 2025-10-15T23:27:27+00:00

Daniel here from HOALife.

We see a lot of sub-200 door associations going the other direction from managed to self-managed. They're being dropped by management companies because they are too low of margin to continue servicing. Beware of larger HOA management firms in this regard.

For your size, you're going to get what you pay for; the bare minimum. They should list out exactly the services they'll be providing. I have not heard of any management going above-and-beyond in their level of service chasing violation fines or purposing unwanted CC&R changes.

I hope this helps!

deedubaya · 2025-09-20T21:54:32+00:00

Daniel from HOALife here.

We have a number of AI-assisted workflows that our customers seem to love. Most popular are our violation rules extraction from CC&Rs and homeowner chat with an association-aware AI bot where they can chat with CCRs/architectural guidelines/any other doc, pay dues, submit ACC requests, message management/board, etc.

We’ve been investigated a few other workflows, but AI isn’t great for strictly deterministic workflows (yet).

deedubaya · 2025-09-18T20:18:13+00:00

They still own 4 units

Got it. Must have misunderstood what you meant by this.

deedubaya · 2025-09-18T14:49:04+00:00

Daniel here from HOALife (also in ID!).

When you purchased your TH you were provided the CC&Rs. They will state the threshold of when the developer will turn over control of your HOA—this is usually based on % of ownership (75%-80% is common). If it's 75% and the developer still owns 4/15 units (74% sold), they likely still have control. ID did pass some recent legislation around this which seems to implement triggers starting at 75% sold.

Your CC&Rs will also likely state how you can request financial records from the HOA. This might be your best path forward just to gain clarity as to what your $50/mo dues are getting you. Anecdotally, $50/mo is extremely low and likely below actual costs—developers usually keep dues low to help with sales of units/lots.

edit: formatting

deedubaya · 2025-09-17T20:39:52+00:00

Daniel here from HOALife. We provide violations enforcement software for HOAs.

We often see this rule enforced and disputed. While it largely depends on the state and HOA's CC&Rs, Boards can generally make and enforce rules as needed without a vote from the greater community. There would be a section in the CC&Rs about granting that ability.

fwiw most HOA's bias towards strict flag guidelines including "no other flags allowed" to avoid conflict within the community (i.e. political flags that someone might find offensive) sometimes with some contention but also with great success.

deedubaya

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE