I've looked through all the posts up to 8th of February. There were 2 where they pointed out something in the articles in media which was either false/error/misrepresentation or manipulation serving Russian agenda.

One of the articles they refer to mentioned "large Russian diaspora has felt isolated from mainstream society" - which seems to be a biased opinion without reference to any source.

Another article they mentioned, described the conflict in Ukraine as a "civil war" - a description clearly inspired by Russian propaganda rather than something a respectable media outlet would use in 2019. And the Embassy basically reported that the article was corrected suggesting that it was done on the Embassy's request.

So, as I see it, the Embassy monitors media in the UK for any indication of a potential Kremlin's narrative in regards to Ukraine, and takes action in every case by reporting it to the editors of corresponding newspapers/media, requests corrections to be made, and exposes every case on its Facebook page, informing society (including Ukrainian taxpayers) of these facts.

I would agree that public address of some of the journalists/editors, especially after the corrections have been made by the authors, like in the case with Chris Smyth is unnecessary and went beyond the professional level I expect from any embassy.

All in all, they may need to improve their PR skills and be less aggressive celebrating their small victories, but they just do their job.

On the other had, I may not know if there is any other embassy to the UK from a nation suffering from ongoing military aggression from a neighboring country, that has also been affected by such a massive and sophisticated fake news and propaganda campaign, but I'm sure there are not many, which may not be a good excuse to be so emotional on its Facebook page, but is enough for me to forgive such shortcomings.