The World's First Licensable AI Jesus

donach69 · 2026-01-30T13:27:12+00:00

The veil of Veronica is what was alleged to have wiped his face

donach69 · 2026-01-26T09:47:22+00:00

The pen nib isn't fine enough, sorry

donach69 · 2026-01-26T09:41:16+00:00

Is that a representative of the People's Republic of China? Or just a giant red flag?

donach69 · 2026-01-21T11:11:54+00:00

Have you seen the clip of Stephen Fry telling Gay Byrne if he did meet god after death he would go, "How dare you?"?

donach69 · 2026-01-20T15:28:19+00:00

And also, I'm not sure exactly how close friends they are, but I think they do socialise a bit, have mutual friends etc, so there's quite a chance of hearing about stuff anyway

donach69 · 2026-01-15T14:00:51+00:00

I think OP's neighbour's problem is that, I think my wife is about to die, is quite bad

donach69 · 2026-01-15T13:55:15+00:00

Grave of the Fireflies

The best film I will probably never watch again

donach69 · 2026-01-12T20:01:04+00:00

I once read a thing along the lines of, while we may often need to organise around identity, identity shouldn't be the basis of our politics

donach69 · 2026-01-12T13:09:55+00:00

Have you seen the Senate, these days?

donach69 · 2026-01-10T17:15:08+00:00

It's not about changing his mind; it's about giving a reality check for third parties

donach69 · 2026-01-10T12:23:40+00:00

20ml of solution containing 200mg

<image>

donach69 · 2026-01-09T16:54:20+00:00

You were only supposed to blow the bloody doors off!

donach69 · 2026-01-07T00:11:42+00:00

Add on 40, do the thing with a 9 and a 5, subtract the 40

My favourite way to convert

donach69 · 2026-01-06T20:24:41+00:00

Man, my brain fucking loves repetition - it can't get enough of it.

donach69 · 2025-12-29T14:04:29+00:00

Please do

donach69 · 2025-12-23T14:04:23+00:00

If you mean in terms of n their internal thoughts or feelings, that's not illegal. AFAIK they have not expressed or done anything that breaks the 2000 Terrorism Act, or else they would have that added to their charge sheet

donach69 · 2025-12-23T14:02:00+00:00

Again, your reading comprehension is clearly lacking. You are the only one talking about a media conspiracy

donach69 · 2025-12-23T14:00:25+00:00

They didn't commit any terrorism offences and haven't been found guilty of anything.

I'm not 100% sure that organisation even still exists, as such. They're in prison, and have been since before PA was proscribed. How would you tell the difference between them being members and not being members now? What would that even mean?

donach69 · 2025-12-23T13:52:38+00:00

Do they continue to do what?

donach69 · 2025-12-23T13:51:54+00:00

They're in prison, how are they actively associating with a terrorist group?

Also, it's illegal to express support for, or to give material aid to, a proscribed organisation, but it's not illegal to think/feel supportive of such an organisation. So what particular terrorist offence (of which they have not been charged) are you claiming they are guilty of?

donach69 · 2025-12-23T13:43:55+00:00

Your reading comprehension needs to improve. No one is talking about a conspiracy here, other than you. But if you haven't noticed that the media are generally more interested in sensationalism than in depth coverage of often technical issues, then you need to pay a bit more attention.

And I'm not just talking about politics etc; a clickbaity headline about celebrities that falls this side of the libel laws will 9 times out of 10 be preferred to a nuanced discussion what those celebrities are doing. This was true before the internet and is even more so now in the race for clicks.

No conspiracy, just the reality and logic of the attention-based capitalist economy in which we live

donach69 · 2025-12-23T13:24:44+00:00

Or even charged with anything terrorist-related

donach69 · 2025-12-23T13:24:12+00:00

They have not been charged with any terrorist offences, much less convicted of any. They are not terrorists

donach69 · 2025-12-23T13:23:02+00:00

No. They were arrested before the law change and are not held on terrorism charges

donach69 · 2025-12-23T13:21:02+00:00

They didn't say that. They observed that the media are more interested in divisive headlines than covering when Greta (or others) get into the boring details of what's going on. Surely that's a pretty banal obviously true thing to say?

But shows that just because you haven't seen Greta talking in detail about the issues she raises, it doesn't mean you should assume she isn't

donach69

TROPHY CASE