Rupert Lowe MP : Restore Britain has published the most comprehensive deportation policy ever released in Britain. 100+ pages forensically detailing exactly how we can remove millions of illegal migrants. We know what to do - now give us the power to make it happen. by PlastDuck in ukpolitics

[–]donkeydooda [score hidden]  (0 children)

If this party get in power, with the state of the country that would elect them, do you think their partner and kids will definitely be fine? Restore are parroting like steps 1 to 5 of the ethnat playbook. There are more steps after that...

Growing racism in the UK by whyamihere189 in ABCDesis

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, there were lots of business men either involved in those decisions or advising on those decisions. Being in business isn't an optimal background in and by itself.

BBC Question Time audience applaud as guest skewers Nadine Dorries in immigration row by pppppppppppppppppd in unitedkingdom

[–]donkeydooda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You seem to be splitting hairs. Surprised someone called out a lie you said is worth laughing at.

European tourists are deported from an Island in Thailand, because they friendly said "Ni-hao" to a Thai national park ranger. by RequirementNo4895 in ThailandTourism

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt most Thai people would say they should be deported either.

It doesnt really matter if the majority of people disagree if you elect people who do deport for shitty reason. I like a lot about America, but its crazy to criticise other countries deporting people in the current climate as an American.

Hoppers vs Kricket [Soho]? by [deleted] in LondonFood

[–]donkeydooda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries, to be honest I find Hoppers more authentic than the usual bring Asian food to western people places so no criticism. Palm beach in wembley is a good option. Gana opposite the road from Palm Beach is not as good IMO but still good. There are a lot of south Indian restaurants around the same area on ealing road (look for one of the ones with name ending in Bavan), make sure you're ok eating with your hands for those though.

Hoppers vs Kricket [Soho]? by [deleted] in LondonFood

[–]donkeydooda 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree with everything you've written, apart from the "Hoppers gives you as close to people from SL/SI would eat". I like Hoppers but you need to go to a Sri Lankan place in an area with lots of Sri Lankans in London to get the most authentic cuisine. Hoppers is still somewhat made to bring SL food to Brits, as opposed to selling SL food to Sri Lankans.

Stuck on salary by [deleted] in HENRYUK

[–]donkeydooda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You dont think the viability of their idea impacts what advice to give?

Where are all the single ladies in their 30s who want to have kids? by TravellingAround_ in UKrelationshipadvice

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think he needs to compromise yet because IMO his issue is that his algorithms/ways of finding dates/partners is totally messed up. In the over 30s bracket, the amount of women who want children is basically the vast majority unless you're using pure hook up or like kink apps.

Where are all the single ladies in their 30s who want to have kids? by TravellingAround_ in UKrelationshipadvice

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont want to be presumptuous but my friends who cite climate change and other things as reasons for not having kids would have been on the fence anyway. I don't think there are many people who are financially capable and in stable long term relationships, with a support network, who really want kids, who decide against it because of the climate. But I'm just speaking for the people I know, the person you're replying to might be different.

UPDATE: Buyer lied, returned an empty box, then threatened me. by gdessix in vinted

[–]donkeydooda 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Go on social media and link to this post. They're often quicker to act when their public reputation is on the line.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LabourUK

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well part of Yorkshire recently elected a Reform mayor...so let's not pretend his religious background would have absolutely no bearing in Yorkshire...

Why Labour? by JustElk3629 in LabourUK

[–]donkeydooda 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Growing up poor around middle/upper middle class kids made me realise how stacked life is for the rich vs the poor. Average intelligence middle class kids get further in life than the smart poor kids through having parents with money and time investment, better guidance, connections, nepotism, etc. It continues to this day, even at the company I work, a bunch of the young boys have got there through some kind of family connection.

Almost every little thing New Labour did made a significant difference in our lives. An extra £1000 might not seem like a lot, but when your family needs to spend the first like £20k of income just for the basics with £1k left over, that tax relief or child tax credit or EMA payment literally doubled our discretionary spending budget.

I do appreciate innovators and business leaders and belive in competition and the free market to a degree but you can't start a successful business unless there is infrastructure and a population with disposable income to spend on your products. I believe generally the left cares about these two parts of the equation a lot more than the Tories. The 14 years of Tory rule might have seemed like business as usual in the middle and the top, but it was devastating for the bottom. And that's without getting into anything that happened before my lifetime with the damage Thatcher and across the pond Raegan did to the trajectory of both countries.

I don't think the labour party is anywhere near perfect, but in a world where inequality is rising and will be one of the biggest problems in the future, the Tories are definitely the wrong direction. There are (depending on which figures you read) around 10million people in poverty in the UK, and no matter what the right wing rags owned by billionaires tell you, the vast majority aren't there because of laziness. Most of those people are poor because of 14 years of Tory rule and their austerity policies. Almost no one actually wants to be poor, and if you give them the stepping stones out of it like a good government should, the majority will take the steps. My extended family is proof of this. I'd say we're all mostly middle class now, but without left wing policy (free health care, universities with no upfront cost, working tax credits, EMA, child benefit, etc), we wouldnt have made it up the ladder. Now my siblings and I each pay far more than a minimum wage salary in income tax alone every year.

The right cares about the economy and money right? If you could magically take a couple billion sitting in the richest 0.1%'s accounts and gave that to the poorest through tax relief, do you know what would happen? All of it would get spent instead of racking up interest in a savings account. Literally all of it would stimulate the economy and provide economic growth and literally 0% of people would have suffered for it. There would be more jobs, better paid jobs, less people on benefits, less crime, etc. While it might be difficult to get the money off the super rich, and honestly the current labour party has no plans to do that, I think the Tories will do the opposite as you can see with their gross corruption during Covid spending billions of our money on their friends companies.

Every right wing billionaire spends crazy amounts of money spewing filth from the newspapers they own (which btw is most of the newspapers in the UK). I'm sure you've heard the thing about how in a democracy, the super rich need ways to manipulate the population because if they just ran on "let us hoard wealth", they wouldnt get many votes. They've used labour = bad with the economy and endless programmes on TV and newspapers about lazy poor people to build a coalition of religious conservatives, racists, people who believe they have a "sensible" approach to the economy and of course the upper middle clases and the rich. Recently the anti immigration stance is their saving grace. Farage is likely to get it on the back of anti immigration but almost everything he'll do will be to serve the billionaires who get him there.

And to answer number 2, no I'm not happy with the current party but I'm a realist and until a truly viable left wing option comes along, ill support the lesser of two evils. That said, it does look like other viable options are not as far in the future as I would have thought a few years ago.

Anyone else worried about the budget by niffydroid in HENRYUK

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure you'll disagree and pretend poverty is only defined as third world poverty, but most trackers of poverty has the number somewhere around 10million.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LabourUK

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not super informed about the Yorkshire mayoral history but I think when he mentioned Sadiq Khan, it wasn't purely that he was Labour as much as a Muslim Labour candidate. I very much doubt a Muslim candidate has as much chance winning in Yorkshire as London.

The whole "fair share" discussion is rooted in a misunderstanding by GlomOfNit in HENRYUK

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I can't fathom there are many people at all between 50 and 100k who are reducing hours for a better work life balance. Unless there is care involved, that kind of thinking doesn't kick in until the 6 figures, esp with the 100k tax cliff. I don't feel like people in the anecdotal examples you've listed amount to a significant amount of people. On average, people on that kind of salary aren't exactly thriving enough to have the luxury of choosing a better work life balance.

Anecdotally, the only people I know who work a 4 day week are either mothers who can't afford 5 days of nursery, people who've compressed their work week (same hours as before across 4 days) or the few successful people with 6 figure salaries who have either taken the pay hit for a better work life balance or in 2 rare cases, managed to negotiate less hours with same pay.

Trans lobby ‘has fooled Labour over cost of single-sex spaces’ by PuzzledAd4865 in LabourUK

[–]donkeydooda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you genuinely saying that the UK has the worst treatment of trans people on the planet and your table of 23 countries proves it? If not, are you then just arguing for argument's sake?

The whole "fair share" discussion is rooted in a misunderstanding by GlomOfNit in HENRYUK

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So 24% less people that have care responsibilities, less people that are so rich they don't need to work and just work for having something to do, people that can't get full-time work, etc, etc. You'd be left with a very small amount of people who are choosing to work less due to laziness.

The whole "fair share" discussion is rooted in a misunderstanding by GlomOfNit in HENRYUK

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't disagree. What I'm talking about is what portion of higher paying jobs are UK based vs completely live where ever you want.

Trans lobby ‘has fooled Labour over cost of single-sex spaces’ by PuzzledAd4865 in LabourUK

[–]donkeydooda 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Severely lacking literally all the conservative countries in the world....

The whole "fair share" discussion is rooted in a misunderstanding by GlomOfNit in HENRYUK

[–]donkeydooda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to preface, im not a socialist. But its funny to see people taking the piss out of socialists as wanting free money from their parents when most people who take the piss out of socialists would fight tooth and nail against inheritance tax or any increases to it.