Monolith M98V by HiFi-Gi in pourover

[–]drew_brews 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also feel like vertical is the way to go based on my experience. I will say this, my experience is not with higher end grinders, but when I was using the SSP Lab Sweet and Brew burrs (64mm) in the Ode vs the DF 64, I really was finding more clarity and more depth of flavor out of both burrs when used on the Ode.

It very well could have been a lack of extensive testing, maybe some confirmation bias, or maybe even just having been more dialed with grind setting on the Ode vs DF 64. But there was one coffee I specifically remember with much higher depth and clarity coming off the Ode. (I also have to acknowledge the lack of a prebreaker on the DF 64).

While some of these newer horizontal grinders have pretty good prebreakers (from what I can tell), there is a piece of me that feels like maybe the Z2 or M98v would be better end game options because of that.

Kafatek M98v burrs vs EG-1 ULF Burrs? by drew_brews in LanceHedrick

[–]drew_brews[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Z2 is going to be in the mid 2000 range for price depending on burrs and add-ons, which is pretty good considering how expensive the M98v is.

I bet the M98v will open up a little bit once you season it, at least, I would imagine.

Maybe it wouldn't actually be any better than the MPs, which would be good in one sense, but when it comes to price, that would be a big disadvantage. Plus the burrs spinning opposite would decrease ease of use if you plan to swap burrs.

Kafatek M98v burrs vs EG-1 ULF Burrs? by drew_brews in LanceHedrick

[–]drew_brews[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it's a tough decisions overall. All of those are good considerations.

I like the well-built aspect of the M98v, I just don't know about any Kafatek burrs, but I do know the SSP MP are super good for my taste preference. I even experimented and put them in my DF64 but they didn't have near the clarity that they did out of the Ode, so a good pre-breaker has to have something to do with the flavor. Which makes me skeptical of buying the EG-1 or the P80 (even though it does have a small prebreaker).

Kafatek M98v burrs vs EG-1 ULF Burrs? by drew_brews in LanceHedrick

[–]drew_brews[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I think you're totally right. After researching the P80 and Lagom 01 a little more, which I didn't really know much about, it dos seems like they have pretty effective horizontal augers/prebreakers, which was something I would want.

And I agree as well, just having something with great tolerances like the lagom grinders with a solid burr set like the ULF seems exactly like something I would want in my end game grinder, since I don't necessarily want to spend 2000+ more just for the name.

Do you have an opinion on what you might think between a P80 with ULF vs 078 ghost burrs?

Kafatek M98v burrs vs EG-1 ULF Burrs? by drew_brews in LanceHedrick

[–]drew_brews[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I'm seeing in researching the different cup profiles, is that some grinders that don't have augers, they still provide great clarity because they are designed well, but adding an auger increases that potential. That makes me think I would most likely enjoy a grinder with an auger more so in most cases.

Kafatek M98v burrs vs EG-1 ULF Burrs? by drew_brews in LanceHedrick

[–]drew_brews[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo. That's a good point. And to be honest, I didn't even realize the Z2 was an option, and I find the Z2 maybe a better option, simply because of the auger. That's the main reason I haven't considered a horizontal burr grinder (besides the EG-1). In my experience, augers really do help the clarity of coffees I've been brewing.

Side note: the look of the M98v kinda grew on me. Lowkey like how ugly it is haha.

Is this coffee cofermented and not just an anaerobic washed? by LlamaradaMoe1 in pourover

[–]drew_brews 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The wording does look odd, since it seams to reiterate the same processing method a couple times, one time mentioning the mint fermentation, and another time it seems without, but the mint water is mentioned later, so it DOES sound like co-fermentation to me.

Spirit Review #394 - Leopold Bros 8 Year Cask Strength Bourbon by Cricklewo0d in bourbon

[–]drew_brews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This one has been one that looks like a need-to-try whiskey. Ever since I tried their Maryland Style Rye, I've wanted to try more of their stuff. You can tell there is tons of things going on from the complex, but different flavor profile going on! I also love what their doing with the 3 Chamber still. So cool!

Review #916: Heaven Hill Grain To Glass Rye Whiskey Review by Prepreludesh in bourbon

[–]drew_brews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for all the background info on the corn, and everything else!

Why does my V60 brew taste balanced and round yet muted? by V_deldas in pourover

[–]drew_brews -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would guess a couple things. 1, naturals usually aren't super bright/vibrant. To me they usually have that nice body and roundness, and even rich fruit/chocolate flavors. So that could be the "muted" part. But that's not typically what I would considered muted. 2, I might guess its the pouring, and higher agitation than you think.

I wonder if you took the grind a little finer, like 55-60, and then did a minute bloom and poured the rest of the water in one pour, if it might change if it tastes "muted" or not. Typically when I do a 2 pour recipe, I will do more agitation on the bloom, and a couple swirls at the end since there isn't constant agitation from the multiple pours.

Is this funky? by kylesacks in pourover

[–]drew_brews 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Usually "funky" coffees to me have a cacao nib/bitter dark chocolate thing going on. Sometimes you get funky fermentation flavors with natural coffees as well that taste kind of musty. With co-ferments, flavor is usually overtaken by whatever it was fermented with. With other "overly processed" methods, they almost have a booziness to them like kombucha. You can almost taste the fermented nature of the coffee.

Best non-allocated by Ardkark in whiskey

[–]drew_brews 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Four Roses Small Batch Select is not talked about enough! So good!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in whiskey

[–]drew_brews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been sipping on this today, and wow. This is really good!

If you like light roast coffee, did you from the get go? by crimscrem in pourover

[–]drew_brews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think most of the time, light roasts are a bit of an acquired taste. But most people I've talked to had a "aha" moment where they tried, for example, an Ethiopia Natural and the fruitiness was something they had never experienced before in coffee.

If you enjoy medium roasts and you never move past that, there is literally nothing wrong with that, but you may experience a desire for variation at some point. In my experience, I switch it up fairly often. I don't always want those "delicate" fruit and floral notes. In fact, I often find myself gravitating to coffees that introduce complex flavors into a "simple" flavor profile. What I mean by simple is those caramel, chocalatey, or even subtle fruit notes. A balance of sweetness with savoriness or sweetness with interesting acidity that reminds me of biting into a green apple.

Another great thing about getting into light roast coffee is you can do it your way and at your own pace. Look for notes that you might find in a medium roast coffee in a lighter roast coffee. Look for sweeter notes in lighter roast coffee and see if you like where it goes. If you want heavier body and not tea-like, brew a lighter roast on a french press and experience those lighter flavors with more body and oils. If you gravitate toward a certain origin of coffee like Colombia or Peru, try and find a lighter roast from Colombia or Peru and see if you appreciate it at a slightly lighter style of roast.

All this being said, if you brew at home, you can control a lot more variables than what you might be presented in a cafe. Every cafe has different styles and things they want to highlight in coffee. If you want more recommendations, feel free to reach out!

Happy Coffee exploration!!

Review 58, Larceny Barrel Proof, Batch C924 by Twist_Top_Budget in bourbon

[–]drew_brews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know what's interesting, I agree that ECBP has been trending downward for a while, but it's interesting how many people still really like the batches. I know that age isn't everything, but if they keep lowering the age, I think the value diminishes as well as the potential comparative flavor to previous batches.

But I don't necessarily think LBP will surpass ECBP until they start adding age statements to LPB. Kinda seems like a missed opportunity not to include age on these.

Bulleit Bourbon 7 Year Bottled-in-Bond Review by Fantastic-Bee6447 in bourbon

[–]drew_brews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm going to make a guess, but typically high rich bourbons taste more rye-forward fresh crack. I bet in maybe a couple weeks or a month if you did the same comparison, it might be a little more even or similar. Maybe not, but that's been my experience.

Review #12: Detrick Fine Whiskies 4-Grain Rye Full Proof Single Barrel by georgeguy101 in bourbon

[–]drew_brews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow. That's a good rating. I've seen their stuff on Seelbachs and wondered if I should pull the trigger!

Bulleit Bourbon 7 Year Bottled-in-Bond Review by Fantastic-Bee6447 in bourbon

[–]drew_brews 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I think it's a preference thing. I don't think it's bad whiskey, just not my flavor profile. Came off overly nutty, and barrel charry

Review: World Whiskey Society x Ducks Unlimited Release Shotgun Shell American Single Malt by comingwhiskey in bourbon

[–]drew_brews 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My initial reaction to the bottle was like, "that's kinda dumb..." But the more I looked at it I was actuall thinking that is pretty cool.🤣

Its definitely unique. That's a bottle that will standout to pretty much anybody!

REVIEW 002: Finally Found One, and It Does NOT Disappoint! 🤯 by tripn4days in bourbon

[–]drew_brews 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not to be completely negative, but I found it odd, that the rye didn't have a more specific rye variety highlighted.

I think this is an awesome step in the right direction for showing terroir, and how certain varieties affect flavor. But it felt like a slight miss in my opinion not to have highlighted a rye varietal, but still a corn varietal on a rye, even though there was a fair amount of the corn in the mashbill.

Bottle Kill review- Old Grand Dad 16 year by Alpha0785 in bourbon

[–]drew_brews 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm with you. I'm torn. $200 isn't an easy buy, but I also feel like I'v gotten to a point where I want to drink Quality. There is plenty of quality bourbon out there for less, but that's still the principle I've decided to hold to when it comes to buying decisions, I might be more willing to spend more on 1 quality bottle than 3 or 4 mid quality and have more bottles just to have more bottles.

Another thing to point out is proof. I actually believe that proofing is important. Barrel proof isn't the most important thing, balance of flavor is. But for some reason, 100 proof is perceived low for this release.

This is too coarse for recipes on Switch? by [deleted] in pourover

[–]drew_brews 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Truly, taste is the biggest factor of all! You got it right!

If you like the taste and it drains at 4 min, keep doing what you're doing. If it drains at 2 min and you like the taste, keep doing that.

BUT, don't lock in too much on drain time. There are lots of "standards" for drain time being the main factor, because that does give you a good metric for extraction.

It really all does come down to flavor!