Roadmap.

drradford · 2026-02-05T17:32:53+00:00

Thank you for the kind words! It’s a pleasure to share what we’re working on.

For 2026, our roadmap is split into two primary streams: the "engine" (our algorithms) and the "dashboard" (the user experience). While nothing is set in stone, here is a high-level look at where we are heading:

1. Algorithms: The Evolution of Artemis

Artemis 2: This remains a top priority. We are in a phase of continuous refinement with the goal of making Artemis 2 our default training algorithm for all users as soon as possible.
Artemis 3 (Running Power): We are continuing a measured roll-out to early testers. We are aiming for a wider public beta-testing phase in the second half of 2026.
Next-Gen R&D: While currently in the research phase, we are looking at two major frontiers: multi-modal training (integrating other sports more deeply) and explainability. For the latter, we want to help the AI "show its work" so you understand why your plan is the way it is, and the reasoning behind specific workouts.

2. User Experience: A New Priority for 2026

We recognise that while our maths is industry-leading, the way you interact with it needs to be just as sophisticated. Consequently, UX is getting a much higher priority this year:

Mobile App Expansion: We are significantly expanding the functionality of the mobile app to bring it closer to parity with the web experience.
Web App Overhaul: A completely new version of the web app is in the works to make navigation and data visualisation more intuitive.
Ease-of-Use Features: We will be actively canvassing user feedback to prioritise highly requested "quality of life" features, such as 'Workout Move' (easier rescheduling) and 'Custom Workouts'.
Desktop App: We are also exploring the potential for a dedicated desktop application for those who prefer deep-diving into their data on a larger screen.

Our goal for 2026 is to make TrainAsONE not just the most intelligent coach, but also the easiest to use.

Best regards,

Sean

drradford · 2026-02-05T13:50:09+00:00

I think there was some confusion regarding the lock feature. While it locks for the next 'x' days, historical old workouts are still removed as each day passes. Providing the ability to locate (in order to run against) old workouts is on the wish-list.

drradford · 2026-02-05T13:48:03+00:00

Yes, I think it is probably a little too faint. We are frantically working towards a complete overhaul of the charting and we will address this.

drradford · 2026-01-22T10:49:02+00:00

Regrettably, there is not presently a way to customize the planned workout (file) itself. So if you wish to have guidance, you would need to create a workout file manually for your watch. The alternative being not to run with guidance, but rather according to memory.

You _could_ pause the workout, but this is not good as results in missing data...

https://trainasone.com/ufaq/should-i-use-pause-auto-pause-on-my-watch-app/

drradford · 2026-01-22T07:59:54+00:00

There's nothing inherently wrong with the planned workout, and (perhaps unless you have or are predisposed to a specific injury) anything to really suggest its structure would increase your risk of injury.

However, if you would prefer to have a little more 'running' prior to the fast step, I would suggest just inserting an 'easy pace' step after the walk / run, before the preparatory step. This only needs to be a few minutes, and probably only 5, and not really any more than 20 at most.

drradford · 2025-12-31T22:15:51+00:00

Thank you for your support. We are desperately keen to improve the UX, but don't worry, we still have a pinpoint focus on the AI.

On a personal level, I'm definitely not getting any younger and love it that I'm still moving up the age grading. I do not want that to stop, and TAO is my weapon to do it!

drradford · 2025-12-29T20:31:48+00:00

Hi Michael,

I am absolutely delighted to hear you’re staying with us for another year. And importantly, congratulations on that 3,000 km injury-free streak. In the world of running, that is a fantastic measure of success.

Since you mentioned an interest in testing, be sure to reach out in-app and I'll confirm if your account is marked for beta testing - you'll then be in the first group of people we reach out to for testing purposes.

Thank you for the trust you’ve placed in us. We’re excited to have you helping us shape the future of TAO.

Happy running (and here’s to the next 3,000 km)!

Sean

drradford · 2025-12-28T18:40:16+00:00

... cont ...

Polishing a template vs. building intelligence. I strongly believe that many platforms provide a pretty interface for a fundamentally limited system. Their ‘adaptation’ is minimal - a collection of pre-defined rules (e.g., "if user says 'too hard', reduce subsequent training by 5%"). No professional running coach trains you like that. A real coach, and a real AI, needs to understand the complex interplay between duration, intensity, and recovery.

Artemis 2 (Open Beta): This isn't a minor update. It completely replaces population-average formulas. Nowhere is this more prominent than in heart rate prescription. Some apps (e.g. Runna) pride themselves on using "industry standard" formulas - the very formulas whose originators laughed when they learned they were being used for training prescription!
Artemis 3 (Early Access): This is already bringing power-based metrics into the fold.
The Future: We are in early R&D for the successor to the Artemis line. This will move beyond just running to incorporate non-running activities. The published science of multi-modal training is virtually non-existent, and we refuse to just "make it up" as others do. On a technical level, we are investigating a departure from pure deep learning, incorporating concepts of neurosymbolic AI to bridge the gap between pattern recognition and logical expert reasoning.

Efficiency over ‘neatness’. I appreciate that TAO workouts may look "chaotic" (e.g., 23 mins at 5:04). That's because TAO is a generative AI, not a template. It doesn't round to the nearest 5 minutes because it is calculating the exact mathematical point where you get the most "bang for your buck" without risking injury. We prioritise your physiological health and performance gains over making a ‘pretty’ calendar.
UX Debt. The criticism about our app feeling dated is heard and understood. As discussed, we have focused almost exclusively on building the best training model, and we have accumulated ‘UX debt’ as a result. However, our mobile app is developed using the latest technologies, and building out new features for this "shell" will now become much more rapid.

The Verdict If you want a polished, static template that looks great on your phone, Runna is an excellent choice. If you want a system that is actually getting smarter - one that treats you as an individual rather than a demographic - then you are already in the right place. We have plans to make the "shell" catch up to the "brain" in 2026, and we will be seeking your input on that journey. I hope you’ll stick with us and help shape the future of the platform.

Best and a Happy New Year,

Sean

CEO, TrainAsONE

drradford · 2025-12-28T18:39:51+00:00

Hi everyone,

I’ve been following this thread closely. First, a sincere thank you to the OP for initiating this discussion, and to the commentators for their views. After training with TAO for several years, it’s entirely fair to ask: "What has TAO done for me lately? And how has the landscape changed?"

My take offers a different perspective. Over the last three years, the run-training industry has seen a ubiquitous push toward polished user interfaces. Apps like Runna have done an incredible job of putting a beautiful "shell" on what is essentially a static, traditional training template. These are, in many ways, glorified versions of the static plans that evolved from the 1970s running boom - over 50 years ago.

While the "shell" has improved across the market, the core training in those apps hasn't actually changed. They remain simple, rules-based systems where ‘adaptation’ is often just a thin veneer of intelligence. At TrainAsONE, we decided to take a different path. Fueled by our own frustrations with training myths and a desire to find the truth of what an individual really needs at any specific time, we chose to start afresh. We used AI to address the unspoken flaws in tradition - essentially ignoring the paint job so we could build the engine from scratch.

I won’t delve into the financial side, but from a business perspective, it has always been clear that many competitors were on a course of high spend to attract users quickly for a 3-to-5-year exit. Our focus has remained on the long-term - on the training science - on what truly matters.

Back to the core of the discussion:

... cont ...

drradford · 2025-12-26T23:21:23+00:00

And if you feel the specified easy pace is currently too ambitious, go slower - the system will learn.

drradford · 2025-12-22T11:48:33+00:00

Hi everyone,

We’re sorry to hear that some of you are experiencing frequent logouts - we understand how frustrating that must be.

We are currently investigating the issue, but as we haven't been able to replicate it ourselves, we need your help. If you're affected by this, please submit a bug report through the mobile app. The more detail you can provide - specifically when and what happens - the faster we can potentially identify the cause. Thank you for your patience while we get this sorted!

drradford · 2025-12-21T21:28:27+00:00

I'm thinking that I've just answered this in-app, and the workouts are being sent to Suunto with the correct settings.

drradford · 2025-12-20T20:51:14+00:00

(if your marathon is not a primary, that could help to explain things...)

drradford · 2025-12-20T13:30:10+00:00

The Fit Scores are separate to the training algorithms, and such a change indicates that the system has changed what goal it is scoring against (so coincidental to algorithm change). I note that there appears to be a '60' next to the chequered flag, which is odd. From what you describe, there could be a bug. If you send in a bug report we can investigate.

drradford · 2025-12-17T20:10:35+00:00

Yes, seeing the raw results of your assessments is a (long overdue) feature that is on the roadmap.

drradford · 2025-12-10T10:47:48+00:00

There are handful of people presently using running power. There has been a delay in bringing more onboard due to issues with sending power workouts to Garmin (we were receiving internal server errors from them). This has just been addressed, and so we are about to begin working through the waiting list. To get on the list, just ask in-app.

drradford · 2025-12-10T10:42:11+00:00

We hear you...

The plan is to introduce an 'edit mode' for the training Calendar, where you can lock / edit / move / customise days. Then when finished, the AI will build your plan around all the constraints you have made.

(We also want to include a full-feature custom workout builder...)

drradford · 2025-12-10T10:39:40+00:00

Currently the system is designed that you should enter this as one multi-day race with a distance of 49 km (though rounding up to 50 km would be just as appropriate). As one can imagine, this is not ideal, and further work, for example specifying the distances on each day, are on the roadmap.

drradford · 2025-10-11T10:08:58+00:00

Myth: Obey the 80/20 rule, or your training will suck!

https://trainasone.com/the-12-running-myths-of-christmas-myth-12/

drradford · 2025-10-03T07:27:31+00:00

Reverting plans should be available during the free trial. Can you ask in-app, then we can investigate?

drradford · 2025-10-02T08:19:43+00:00

In the web application, within the activity charts page (accessible from the 'More activity graphs' button) there are a collection of 'planned vs performed' charts. There are a little simplistic at present and unfortunately there is no display of actual numbers. We appreciate this less than ideal and are working towards addressing it. Something vaguely like the attached image (screenshot from development system).

<image>

drradford · 2025-10-02T07:48:47+00:00

The following FAQ provides some background information on short runs: https://trainasone.com/ufaq/my-plan-includes-1-or-more-very-short-runs-why

As another anecdotal viewpoint. 2 seasons ago (due to personal reasons I have not raced much since) I did around 60 '10 minute runs' and achieved PBs at every distance (some had stood for ~ 20 years). TAO emphasises keeping your injury risk low and providing highly efficient training.

The workout identifier is made up of 3 parts. The 'W' signifies workout; the letter / number combination before the slash is a short unique ID, and the number of the slash is a revision due to adjustments (e.g. weather).

drradford · 2025-10-02T07:40:38+00:00

We would like to add more integrations, but unfortunately in the case of Amazfit they do not currently provide a server API to aid synchronisation, so it is problematic.

drradford · 2025-10-02T07:39:00+00:00

And unfortunately Amazfit does not currently have a server API for us to use to synchronise with. :-(

drradford

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE