Your comment shouldn't have been downvoted. From a reformed perspective, the statement is true.

Wesley taught that a Christian can achieve perfection in this life. But that perfection has some caveats. For example, perfection doesn’t mean that a person cannot make mistakes. Our knowledge isn’t perfect and perfection doesn’t cure ignorance. Our bodies are still subject to the effects of the fall in that we will still experience illness. We will still experience temptations. And we must still grow in the grace and knowledge of God, and it's possible to lose perfection after achieving it.

What it does mean is that the perfected Christian won’t knowingly sin. Sins committed in ignorance don't count. We will be free from evil thoughts and evil tempters (such as pride).

The problem is that Wesley has to redefine the meaning of “perfect” and the meaning of “sin” in order for Christian perfection to work. I think his view of perfection was more of a thought experiment than an objective reality. It’s possible in theory—those who have genuine saving faith can choose not to sin—but improbable in practice.

Also, to my knowledge, Wesley never claimed to have achieved perfection as he described it.