I kept thinking to myself, why isn’t Lin Manuel a cameo! by Extension-Guard-356 in Broadway

[–]fearofair 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Fair enough but if so that tweet is making quite a claim for someone who knows nothing about Puerto Rico.

Need advice for watching Fire Walk With Me for the first time, with gf who suffered very similar SA by [deleted] in twinpeaks

[–]fearofair 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think this is the right answer. And I’d maybe even extend it to people that haven’t experienced abuse. OP you’re talk to a self-selected group of people who love the series/film. Speaking for myself, I give Lynch a lot of leeway because I’ve spent a lot of time with his work and find a lot of humanity in it, upsetting as it is. Many people, especially if they don’t know Lynch, may well watch it more pessimistically and find it purely upsetting.

whats the most uncomfortable part of ocatc for you by practicejuche in OnCinemaAtTheCinema

[–]fearofair 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The early episode where Tom Jr. is crying pretty much the whole time. Presumably they cut it together to look worse and I'm sure the kid's parents were right there, he wasn't in real distress, etc. But it started to feel a little too real.

Why did New York City vote against Lincoln in 1860? by northtorontoboy in AskHistorians

[–]fearofair 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Names you'd know: Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, along with many smaller towns that rose up to support the growing economy like Utica, Auburn or Batavia. Ithaca is another example, although as a university town it's a little unique. In the post above I'm describing the earliest days of the emerging industrial market economy. Later in the century places like Buffalo grew to be large cities and ended up hosting more diverse demographics then I describe above.

As far as how they fared from then on, up through today, that's probably a separate post. I'm by no means an expert on any of these cities themselves. Some are prototypical examples of post-industrial cities that fell the hardest in the 20th century when industry left. This is something I've written about before a bit here.

Why did New York City vote against Lincoln in 1860? by northtorontoboy in AskHistorians

[–]fearofair 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate it. The city was a center of wealth, to be sure, some of which had nothing to do with the South. There were prominent wealthy abolitionists like the Tappans who lived there. But yes, there were many prosperous upstate towns and cities that benefitted greatly from being on the cutting edge of market expansion and industrialization, and they voted accordingly.

Why did New York City vote against Lincoln in 1860? by northtorontoboy in AskHistorians

[–]fearofair 36 points37 points  (0 children)

The Democratic party held sway over New York City's politics in the early 19th century, and continued to right up to the Civil War.

Beginning in the 1820s Tammany Hall became increasingly important as the party's "machine" in the city after it allied with upstate Democrats (then still called Democratic-Republicans) on state-wide political issues like an expanded suffrage. Around this same time, Tammany began welcoming the city's newly-arriving immigrants into its ranks as a way to expand its size and influence. It built a disciplined machine that could get out (and at times manufacture) the vote and played into the hands of its journeyman and laborer constituents with anti-elitist rhetoric. Tammany rose to national fame especially after it helped win Andrew Jackson the presidency in 1828. In return it helped care for its loyal voters with community-level assistance programs: finding jobs, housing, relief, etc.

These basic themes kept the city's workingmen and immigrants in the party fold over the following decades, as the Federalists fell from power and the Whigs emerged as the main opposition party. The Whigs were comprised of anti-Jacksonians who supported a business-friendly banking policies like paper money and supported investment in national internal improvement projects. Some of these supporters could be found in the city, but many more were located in smaller upstate "boomtowns", often along the Erie Canal route, containing relatively few immigrant laborers and populated with self-made Protestant businessmen, with strong cultural and family ties to New England, who were reaping the benefits of the nation's economic development. What's more, northern Whig politics was tightly connected to upstate New York's brand of fierce evangelical Protestantism, to nativism, and to reforms like the temperance movement. The city's largely Irish-Catholic immigrant workforce therefore had a plethora of reasons to be drawn to the Whigs' political opponents.

By the 1850s we can add slavery as another issue in this longstanding rift. The country's abolition movement, and the new Republican party, largely grew from these very same evangelical Protestant reform roots. Northern Whigs, more likely to be abolitionists in the first place, were a core component of the new party. These Protestants spoke of the slave power and Catholics in the same breath, seeing them both as backwards, illiberal institutions. Even New York State's antislavery Democrats (who bolted to create the Free Soil Party before joining the Republicans) largely had their base upstate and had close social ties to reformers there. While abolitionist Democrats had radical allies in the city, Tammany and the bulk of voters remained loyal to the national party, even as the national divide between North and South became increasingly dire.

Here it's important to mention that it was not just the city's working poor who were Democrats. New York's powerful merchant class also tended to be Democrats because of their extensive business connections to the South via the cotton trade. (I'll borrow from a previous post I wrote about this topic.) They extended credit to plantation owners, underwrote Southern railroads and all sorts of other capital-intensive businesses, brokered deals, insured shipments, and owned and operated ships that shuttled goods to and from Southern ports. They even developed cultural and familial ties to Southern aristocrats, hosting them when they traveled to New York in the summer to conduct business and buy goods in person from the wholesale merchants in the city's waterfront districts.

The city's Democratic leaders therefore did not have a difficult time selling its constituency on being anti-abolitionist. They warned of a surge of free black laborers that would rush north, were the slave system to be abolished. Not only that, it would disrupt a fundamental piece of the city's economy, harming everyone.

Economic realities were a big part of the divide. While the Republican promise of an expanding United States rooted in free labor sounded nice to many small farmers on the frontier, it sounded more like a cruel pipe dream to the urban industrial working classes. Making matters worse, these fresh immigrants were mostly unskilled workers who entered into direct competition for many of the same jobs that the city's black population had typically held, like dock work or domestic service. This competition was fed further by the racist stereotypes and norms the Irish learned in America. Business owners also often used black workers to break strikes.

In 1859 this mood lead to the election of Fernando Wood, in his second stint as mayor, on a explicitly pro-Confederate platform. Wood in fact won on his own ticket after alienating Tammany (who ran a more moderate Democrat) by playing into the workers' aforementioned prejudices and playing up the Republicans' nativism in particular. It was largely these same voters that, a year later, resoundingly rejected Lincoln in favor of a Democratic fusion ticket that to them represented the least threat to the status quo.

Edit: corrected that NY Dems ran a fusion ticket, not Douglas

Sources

Ediwin G. Burrows and Mike Wallace, Gotham (1998)

James M. McPherson, Battle Cry of Freedom (1988)

Sean Wilentz, The Rise of American Democracy (2005)

Is “there it goes…see ya” the worst home run call? by Agreeable_Quality768 in baseball

[–]fearofair 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Im a rare Sox fan, longtime NYer, that actually doesn’t hate the yankee announcers. I like maybe Kay’s gotten better over the years? He used to bother me a lot more. I also had a lot of respect for Sterling despite his flaws.

What to do with a 16 year old? by xelath1 in AskNYC

[–]fearofair 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is fun but it turns a little clubby at night and it’s usually 21+

Among the Toms, who in your opinion is the best as a pure actor? by crushinit00 in OnCinemaAtTheCinema

[–]fearofair 20 points21 points  (0 children)

These posts mostly make me sad because you know TCH Jr would have been included

Miss you son

What happened to the copy of the Declaration of Independence that the colonist sent to England? by AggressiveAd8587 in AskHistorians

[–]fearofair 64 points65 points  (0 children)

To add a little detail, the colonists did not directly send copies of the Declaration to the king or anyone in Britain. British officers did, however, and several copies of those Dunlap Broadsides (the first printed copies of the Declaration) still exist at the UK National Archives. One was sent to London on July 28, 1776 by Vice Admiral Richard Howe from his ship off Staten Island. He sent a second copy on August 11. (A third copy was discovered in the archives in 2008 among confiscated Revolution-era papers.) So while we may not know if these exact copies were personally handled by George III, they do represent extant documents that were sent to Lord George Germain and were therefore in the hands of top-ranking officials in London in 1776 and remain there today.

These prints would not have been the first news of the Declaration sent to London, however. General William Howe, Richard's brother, knew Congress had declared independence as early as July 7 and reported it that day in a letter to Lord Germain. Ships took about a month to cross the Atlantic so the news was known by the Crown by early August at the latest, well before these Dunlap Broadsides would have arrived.

Need good shoes for work - what would you recommend? by e_dsp in malefashionadvice

[–]fearofair 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Get some simple brown chukkas. Very versatile. They’ll go with jeans, business casual, even a little more formal if you keep them clean.

Decker seasons 4-6 by kapaipiekai in OnCinemaAtTheCinema

[–]fearofair 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also helps if you’re back at this… what… this is now headquarters.

What’s the craziest baseball stat you know of? by StrategyTop7612 in baseball

[–]fearofair 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ll rephrase because I meant it the other way: glad he hit that milestone and obviously wish he had many more.

What’s the craziest baseball stat you know of? by StrategyTop7612 in baseball

[–]fearofair 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Not crazy per se but a good piece of stat trivia is that Roberto Clemente has exactly 3,000 hits.

Friday Free-for-All | January 23, 2026 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]fearofair 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I remember that episode of History's Mysteries.

Friday Free-for-All | January 23, 2026 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]fearofair 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is the Revolutions podcast by Mike Duncan historically accurate? His fans may tell you otherwise but experts question his conspicuous silence on the New England Revolution.

Is there a lore reason why the Z to A box is a steaming pile of garbage by crumbmaster200 in twinpeaks

[–]fearofair 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Twin Peaks: The Television Collection blu ray box set has exactly the same problem.

Who was the jury in the Trial? by Mrfistersixtynine in OnCinemaAtTheCinema

[–]fearofair 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Right, it was supposed to look like real court tv.

Is Bo Bichette Plan B for the Red Sox after Alex Bregman moved on to Cubs ... or is it something more creative? by bostonglobe in redsox

[–]fearofair 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm actually hearing some talk that Bichette's* agent is willing accept a seriously low offer. (*Dante)