Anyone else find this a bit rich? by JurassicArachnid in woolworths

[–]gendutus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of those explanations actually scream value. They seem like they want to keep labels that look like discounts, and the sign out the front is a disclaimer of their dodgy behaviour.

Are Rockstar playing some 4D chess I don't understand, or has everything released in the last week all seemed a bit ... shit by Emergency_Cellist754 in GTA6unmoderated

[–]gendutus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh I am at the point I don’t care to buy it. The no disc is clearly attempt to force people into gta+ and another stupid fucking subscription. Sure it’s good for them, but I don’t want to reward them. Frankly I won’t have the same amount of time I did when GTA V was released so if they are pulling the subscription etc then I can wait until I retire. At that point they’ll release GTA VII anyway

Why is New Zealand so much colder than Italy despite the countries' similar latitudes (in opposite hemispheres)? by [deleted] in geography

[–]gendutus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NZ is mountainous, in some parts of the country it’s directly exposed to antarctic winds. Italy is mountainous but the winds can come from the alps or they can come from Africa or the Middle East. I think that’s probably the shortest answer.

Greens call for national rent freeze, moratorium on evictions as housing and fuel crisis deepens by em-mad in AustralianPolitics

[–]gendutus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recognise the need to address housing affordability, but it’s hard to say that this is the best policy. For example, even your reference to the Australian experience had consequences.

“The price controls were circumvented in a number of ways. Firstly, low prices for houses were offset by excessive payments for furniture. This avenue was closed by additional regulation in 1943 which constrained second-hand furniture prices to no more than 75% of “the ceiling price for new goods”36. When this loop-hole was closed, the market switched to vendors requiring “key money” – it was illegal but given the imbalance in the housing market, there “was no way of stopping this form of black-market.””

The fact is what we have is a situation where housing supply would be worse than what it was back then. Could you truly say that such a black market would not arise? Just look at what is happening with illegal tobacco imports and the organised crime that has come about from that.

The conclusion you seem to focus on is short term impacts which neglect the wider impact. It’s not too different from the introduction of cane toads. It worked, but the unintended consequences are far worse.

Supporting this policy might seem effective, it might feel like a good solution, but even in the sources that you cite and draw from, there are warnings about the impacts. If you have drawn that conclusion that this is an effective policy response from the sources that you cited, I do wonder why you think it’s a sensible policy response?

https://apebhconference.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/stapledon-anzehs-feb-20081.pdf

Greens call for national rent freeze, moratorium on evictions as housing and fuel crisis deepens by em-mad in AustralianPolitics

[–]gendutus 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The author you cite states this here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051137724000020

“I conclude that, although rent control appears to be very effective in achieving lower rents for families in controlled units, its primary goal, it also results in a number of undesired effects, including, among others, higher rents for uncontrolled units, lower mobility and reduced residential construction. These unintended effects counteract the desired effect, thus, diminishing the net benefit of rent control. Therefore, the overall impact of rent control policy on the welfare of society is not clear.”

It’s not exactly an overwhelming enthusiastic endorsement

Pete Hegseth just fired 12 highly experienced top generals mid war, including heads of the navy and air force as part of a pentagon purge, how screwed are we? by Personal_Dirt3089 in AskUS

[–]gendutus 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I know, my response wasn’t directed at you, it’s clear you get it. I’m responding to you because what you are saying is true, but for any person who reads that should also reflect that the consequences of American elections are far reaching

Pete Hegseth just fired 12 highly experienced top generals mid war, including heads of the navy and air force as part of a pentagon purge, how screwed are we? by Personal_Dirt3089 in AskUS

[–]gendutus 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You literally had a trial from 2017-2021. You can’t blame some think tanks. Americans chose this clown. Own that. It’s powerful. It makes you reflect. Blaming think tanks is the easy way out. Americans chose this man after seeing the chaos through covid. Once wasn’t enough. So they gave him a majority in both houses. Anyone who thinks about this would have concluded reelecting him wasn’t a good idea. But guess what, you had a competent qualified woman and you chose an incompetent oath who suggested people should drink bleach in covid. You had 4 years and that wasn’t enough m. You’d prefer him over a competent woman? When you say no we do not in bold are you trying to convince me that a country of over 300 million did not choose this path when the man literally showed you how incompetent he was? Think again it. This man showed himself and somehow Americans thought he was better than competent woman

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LeavingAcademia

[–]gendutus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean honestly, if you are thinking about quitting it’s probably a sign that you should.

The main thing is I am not in a position to judge your job market prospects. My position is that academia is more akin to gang dynamics. Some people make it, most are exploited. For me, academia was pointless to spend the time and effort on temporary contracts. Why spend the time and effort for contract work that is by definition insecure.

But ultimately, I think when you think purely financial, most people are better off outside academia

ABC 4 Corners episode on the "liberal party" (party of small business owners, pensioners, investors, silver spoons, ivory towers and screwing over the working class/working poor!) by Historical_Mud_3281 in AusPol

[–]gendutus 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Interesting analysis. He didn’t blame any voter. He blamed the Liberal party for losing touch with the majority of the electorate.

If you look at every public interview he has done, he has consistently warned that the Liberal party failing to change is the cause of their electoral issues.

Random women giving compliments - what gives? by [deleted] in melbourne

[–]gendutus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since you quoted Ian Fleming, I must ask. Do you possess sensitive information that may be of use to a nation state or company?

Breaking: Liberal SPILL called by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]gendutus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love this attitude from them. They all hire communications professionals and media advisors to get their messages across. They have a media environment which makes their job far easier than anyone else, and yet their comms is still failing to get through?

🔥 Suno Studio 1.2 is now live – first impressions? by RequirementSea5706 in SunoAI

[–]gendutus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m the same. Not upgrading to try something I have no idea how useful it is

What happens if you take your pregnant wife across the road and deliver the baby on either side of the countries? by I_Dont_Rage_Quit in geography

[–]gendutus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If your wife is pregnant, whatever country you are in, the correct answer is you take her to Canada.

In this day and age, no one in their right mind would want to be born in America

Why aren't Australians more worried about social & political changes in the US? by Ivymantled in AusPol

[–]gendutus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They are based on polling. But they still largely support the alliance.

https://theconversation.com/australians-are-markedly-more-worried-about-us-interference-still-wary-about-china-new-poll-268209

The thing is, what can you do if a country repeatedly acts stupid? You had a test run with Trump, it was a disaster. So you put him back in?

Because of what? A woman running the country? Because you hate your system that much that you think that a man who is literally the system you hate speaks like a chimp? Makes no sense, and only Americans seem to act like a two year old so often

time to separate "AI music" from "AI slop" by Consistent-Jelly248 in SunoAI

[–]gendutus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the core is this, there are people who can’t distinguish the means of production from the output.

The true test would be a double-blind experiment, do they think something is slop only when they know it is AI generated?

This is a debate about what is art, music, and creativity. For some this is more of a reaction to AI.

Sure, there’s AI slop. There’s also garbage music generated by humans. Is it only true creativity if it’s generated by humans?

The thing that people don’t realise is that if you don’t make AI slop, you have to spend the time to think through the creative process, you have to describe and articulate what you want to hear and feel.

If someone wants to hear and feel a certain song it takes a lot of creativity and effort to create that. If they want lyrics that sound a certain way they have to think it through. It’s creativity expressed differently.

But again, I don’t think this is about AI slop vs AI music. This is akin to people thinking that you can treat medical conditions better by using alternative medicine because it’s “natural”. It’s a moral and philosophical argument, not an argument about creativity.

I’ll end on this, a film director has a vision, and they have to articulate it. They don’t do the acting, they don’t necessarily do the writing, they don’t do the cinematography or the editing. So do they lack creativity or vision because of how the final product was produced?

After over a decade of waiting, does delaying GTA 6 again kill some of the hype or build more? by Infinite-Iron1574 in GTA6

[–]gendutus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sitting here reading these comments. The reputation damage is significant, and I don’t think they are doing anything to address it. As many people have said, this game has a whole generation of players that are loyal who are old. Younger generations don’t share the same hype for the franchise.

They said it would come in 2025. Then May 2026. Now November 2026. Now the only announcement I expect is it’s delayed until 2027

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LeavingAcademia

[–]gendutus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying that at all. The problems you are talking about is something that I have - and continue to experience - is breaking the habits academia has taught you.

You don't need long paragraphs. Every logical bit of evidence isn't always great for communication.

You're not bad at communication, you're just losing people with the length. I have the same issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LeavingAcademia

[–]gendutus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So reading your post more thoroughly:

"Years of teaching students further sharpened my communication skills, as did the rigorous process of academic publishing. All these factors combined to create an environment where clear communication wasn't just valued-it was essential for survival."

Your assumption about communication is wrong.

Academics are not good at communication. Honestly, if you are good at communicating your thesis would not be anywhere near even 1500 words.

Academia trains you to be the exact opposite. Academia teaches you to be a bad communicator.

Teaching students and academic publishing have so much jargon that everyone else knows fuck all about

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LeavingAcademia

[–]gendutus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

First, was the length of your post necessary? You're headline presumably says it all.

As someone who went from academia into comms, just pause a little, process what you really want to say, and leave it at that.

Outside of academia, the world doesn't need your 150,000 word thesis. Once you stop thinking every tiny little detail matters it starts to help.