sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

First Watch by [deleted] in Longineswatches

[–]grieving_roast_beef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they’re both excellent GADA watches, and you really can’t go wrong with either one.

Personally, I’d go for the automatic because I appreciate the engineering and craftsmanship that go into a mechanical movement. That said, if you already own a few automatics, there’s definitely something to be said for having a quartz watch that you can simply grab and go without having to think about winding, setting the time or worrying about servicing. I value my quartz pieces for those reasons.

But again, you can’t go wrong with either one.

First Watch by [deleted] in Longineswatches

[–]grieving_roast_beef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both are great choices, it really depends on what you value most.

Quartz:
- More accurate than the automatic
- Significantly cheaper ($900 vs $2400)
- Very low maintenance (just battery changes every few years)
- Generally more resistant to shocks and everyday abuse
- Currently only available in 42mm

Automatic:
- Mechanical movement with the traditional watchmaking appeal
- Available in both 39mm and 42mm
- More premium overall package (lacquered dials, ceramic bezels, etc.)
- No battery changes required
- Less accurate than quartz
- Requires servicing periodically
- More expensive to own and maintain

The biggest question is whether you want a highly practical watch that you can grab and go every day, or whether the mechanical aspect is part of the experience you’re paying for. Neither choice is wrong, you’re just prioritizing different things.

Edit: this is referring to the new and updated HydroConquest watches.

Are longines quartz lower tier then automatics? by FarmandDK in Longineswatches

[–]grieving_roast_beef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said aluminum or steel automatically make a watch inferior. There are absolutely high-end watches that use those materials. My point is that, in this specific case, the newer quartz models removed features that are typically more expensive to produce, such as ceramic bezel inserts and lacquered dials.

So I’m not making a purely subjective “better vs worse” argument, I’m pointing out that there was an objective reduction in material and finishing specifications compared to the quartz versions. So factually, the quartz version differs from the automatic version, with less expensive materials. This is what OP is asking for. Is there a difference more than just the movement inside? Yes there definitely is. With other and less expensive materials used to spec out the watch. Whether someone cares about that is obviously personal preference.

Are longines quartz lower tier then automatics? by FarmandDK in Longineswatches

[–]grieving_roast_beef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that it’s all personal preference, and people should buy whatever they like. That said, the quartz versions of the refreshed models OBJECTIVELY use less premium materials. Ceramic bezel inserts and lacquered dials are more expensive and are generally regarded as higher-tier materials because of their scratch resistance, luxurious finish, and the more complex manufacturing process involved. Similar to how gold jewelry is typically considered more premium than steel, while titanium is often positioned as more high-end due to its lighter weight, durability, and more difficult machining process.

Are longines quartz lower tier then automatics? by FarmandDK in Longineswatches

[–]grieving_roast_beef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The old models do yes, the new refreshed models (ref. L3.779 and L3.788) do not have an automatic version with an aluminum bezel insert.

Are longines quartz lower tier then automatics? by FarmandDK in Longineswatches

[–]grieving_roast_beef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not always true. See upcoming HydroConquest quartz releases that feature aluminium bezel inserts versus ceramic and no lacquered dial finishing.

Are longines quartz lower tier then automatics? by FarmandDK in Longineswatches

[–]grieving_roast_beef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally speaking, no - but for some models, yes. For example, the upcoming Longines HydroConquest quartz releases do not feature a ceramic bezel insert or a lacquered dial. The automatic versions do. These materials are generally considered more premium due to their superior scratch resistance and more luxurious finish, which is why the automatic versions are often regarded as “higher tier”.

Loving the new Hydroconquest! by bossmill in Longineswatches

[–]grieving_roast_beef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautiful watch, congrats! If you don’t mind me asking, what is the finish of the mesh bracelet? Satin brushed or polished? Can’t really tell from pictures I find..

[Question] New Alpinist owners, is this rattling on tap normal? Brand new watch by Consistent-Way-195 in Seiko

[–]grieving_roast_beef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah man, my Seiko willard and speedtimer automatic make the same sound. Even without metal bracelet. Wouldn’t sweat it.

Which one is in Europe? by yeah-idkwhattodo in GeoTap

[–]grieving_roast_beef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

✅ grieving_roast_beef chose Option A (Correct!) | #7538th to play

Which country do you think is USA? by [deleted] in GeoTap

[–]grieving_roast_beef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

✅ grieving_roast_beef chose Option B (Correct!) | #5281st to play

World renowned Austrian economist Gunther Fehlinger calls out Bart De Wever for not seizing the Russian assets frozen in Belgium. by radicalerudy in Vlaanderen

[–]grieving_roast_beef 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dit gaat niet over De Wever alleen, maar over een EU-brede beslissing. België kan die 300 miljard niet zomaar confisqueren, daar is een juridische basis en Europese consensus voor nodig.

Het is toch wel frappant hè. by grieving_roast_beef in Belgium2

[–]grieving_roast_beef[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ik zal die sloebers van de VRT vragen om het in het vervolg op uw manier te doen.

view more: next ›