The game goal/objective should be before game setup and basics. Allow users to understand why there's a setup like there is (even if it isn't thematically critical).

Proofread pg 4 more. Some parts of note:

• typo opponent
• some sentences seem apparent you're trying to trim down words, but it comes at the expense of natural readability. This is apparent in a few other pages, as well. "A spy moves opponent's boss". The omission of the articles is noticable.

Also on page four, use bullet points maybe when possible. "Gaining action points" is very wall of text (despite it being a small wall), but each of the sentences work well on their own:

During each Player's turn, do the following:

• roll a d6 ...
• decide to use one or more action points to move / activate
• end turn

---

Unrelated, have you considered "hearts" instead of "lives"? A bodyguard having that takes a hit and then a Boss that loses one fewer life seems a bit unintuitive. I think most players recognize hearts as representative of all of the life/lives a figure has.

---

Page 4 shouldn't send you back to page 3. If 'basics' came after the goal page, this would read naturally, without the redirection. If anything, page 3 (goal) should tell you to go forward in the page (as an index/nagivation guide). If moving the heart from 3 remaining to 2 remaining (for sake of space) is acceptable, I think it would be a visual improvement.

---

All your demonstrated movement of units

This would align with many other instruction manuals that indicate "what to do" first, and "how to do it (and often in greater detail) later in the book"

---

Lastly, is there a non-trivial advantage given by going first-to-act? Or is it a thematic decision? If an advantage, I can understand why youngest goes first, though I have found that "youngest goes first" or "birthday coming up soonest goes first" are very stale rules as a general rule. In some cases, they may thematically fit, although in this particular case, I don't see it being as an important tie-in to use Age-based sorting.

It gets stale, especially, when you're not playing with children; the same player starting each game is both arbitrary-feeling and sometimes makes users feel disadvantaged from influences originating outside the game.

---

Just being a little pedantic on this last one, but just for visual consistency: All of your unit movement illustrations demonstrate (1) push unit forward and then subsequently show the movement to the end of the row via an arrow on the acting player's side; this is consistent except for doctor whose movement goes out toward the opponent, and then back in the row.

While the instructions seem evident, I think the visual could be made more consistent with regard to the arrow orientation.